The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies

ABSTRACTPurpose Many medical school curricula include Scholarly Concentrations (SC) programs. While studies have examined how these programs affect students’ future research involvement, the association of SC programs with students’ specialty choices is uncertain. This study examines the SC program...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hosam H. Alkhatib, Mary Catherine Beach, Kelly A. Gebo, Eric B. Bass, Jenny R. Park, Meredith A. Atkinson, Sapna R. Kudchadkar, Stephen M. Sozio
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2023-12-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2234651
_version_ 1797450066210848768
author Hosam H. Alkhatib
Mary Catherine Beach
Kelly A. Gebo
Eric B. Bass
Jenny R. Park
Meredith A. Atkinson
Sapna R. Kudchadkar
Stephen M. Sozio
author_facet Hosam H. Alkhatib
Mary Catherine Beach
Kelly A. Gebo
Eric B. Bass
Jenny R. Park
Meredith A. Atkinson
Sapna R. Kudchadkar
Stephen M. Sozio
author_sort Hosam H. Alkhatib
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACTPurpose Many medical school curricula include Scholarly Concentrations (SC) programs. While studies have examined how these programs affect students’ future research involvement, the association of SC programs with students’ specialty choices is uncertain. This study examines the SC program factors associated with congruence between the specialty focus of students’ SC projects and the clinical specialty they matched into for residency.Methods The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all students participating in the SC program at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine for graduating classes 2013–2020. They used data from program questionnaires to categorize students’ specialty interests (baseline) and SC program experiences (post-program). The authors categorized each student’s project into specialties according to their faculty mentors’ primary appointments, abstracted student publications from SCOPUS, and abstracted residency program rankings from Doximity Residency Navigator. The authors used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for specialty-congruent matching (same specialty as SC project) and for matching into a Doximity-ranked top 20 or top 10 program.Results Overall, 35.3% of the 771 students matched into the same specialty as their SC projects. Increased odds of specialty-congruent matching occurred with ‘definite’ interest in the specialty at baseline [aOR (95% CI): 1.76 (0.98–3.15)] (P = 0.06) and with increasing publications with SC mentors [aOR (95% CI): 1.16 (1.03–1.30)] (P = 0.01). Congruence between SC specialty focus and matched specialty conferred no significant difference in odds of matching to a Doximity-ranked top 20 or top 10 program.Conclusions Baseline certainty of specialty interest and research productivity were associated with specialty congruence. However, as completing an SC project in a given specialty was not associated with increased odds of matching into that specialty nor into a higher Doximity-ranked program, SC program directors should advise students to pursue SC projects in any topic of personal interest.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:34:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8a872fa947c4dd19a3801c84df94b88
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1087-2981
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:34:11Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Medical Education Online
spelling doaj.art-e8a872fa947c4dd19a3801c84df94b882023-11-27T16:01:58ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812023-12-0128110.1080/10872981.2023.2234651The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residenciesHosam H. Alkhatib0Mary Catherine Beach1Kelly A. Gebo2Eric B. Bass3Jenny R. Park4Meredith A. Atkinson5Sapna R. Kudchadkar6Stephen M. Sozio7Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics, and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USADepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USAABSTRACTPurpose Many medical school curricula include Scholarly Concentrations (SC) programs. While studies have examined how these programs affect students’ future research involvement, the association of SC programs with students’ specialty choices is uncertain. This study examines the SC program factors associated with congruence between the specialty focus of students’ SC projects and the clinical specialty they matched into for residency.Methods The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all students participating in the SC program at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine for graduating classes 2013–2020. They used data from program questionnaires to categorize students’ specialty interests (baseline) and SC program experiences (post-program). The authors categorized each student’s project into specialties according to their faculty mentors’ primary appointments, abstracted student publications from SCOPUS, and abstracted residency program rankings from Doximity Residency Navigator. The authors used multivariable logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) for specialty-congruent matching (same specialty as SC project) and for matching into a Doximity-ranked top 20 or top 10 program.Results Overall, 35.3% of the 771 students matched into the same specialty as their SC projects. Increased odds of specialty-congruent matching occurred with ‘definite’ interest in the specialty at baseline [aOR (95% CI): 1.76 (0.98–3.15)] (P = 0.06) and with increasing publications with SC mentors [aOR (95% CI): 1.16 (1.03–1.30)] (P = 0.01). Congruence between SC specialty focus and matched specialty conferred no significant difference in odds of matching to a Doximity-ranked top 20 or top 10 program.Conclusions Baseline certainty of specialty interest and research productivity were associated with specialty congruence. However, as completing an SC project in a given specialty was not associated with increased odds of matching into that specialty nor into a higher Doximity-ranked program, SC program directors should advise students to pursue SC projects in any topic of personal interest.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2234651Scholarly concentrationsmedical student researchspecialty choicecareer choicecurricular design
spellingShingle Hosam H. Alkhatib
Mary Catherine Beach
Kelly A. Gebo
Eric B. Bass
Jenny R. Park
Meredith A. Atkinson
Sapna R. Kudchadkar
Stephen M. Sozio
The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
Medical Education Online
Scholarly concentrations
medical student research
specialty choice
career choice
curricular design
title The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
title_full The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
title_fullStr The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
title_full_unstemmed The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
title_short The association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students’ matched residencies
title_sort association of a scholarly concentrations program with medical students matched residencies
topic Scholarly concentrations
medical student research
specialty choice
career choice
curricular design
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/10872981.2023.2234651
work_keys_str_mv AT hosamhalkhatib theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT marycatherinebeach theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT kellyagebo theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT ericbbass theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT jennyrpark theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT meredithaatkinson theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT sapnarkudchadkar theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT stephenmsozio theassociationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT hosamhalkhatib associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT marycatherinebeach associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT kellyagebo associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT ericbbass associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT jennyrpark associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT meredithaatkinson associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT sapnarkudchadkar associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies
AT stephenmsozio associationofascholarlyconcentrationsprogramwithmedicalstudentsmatchedresidencies