Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature

This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Afnan M. Saber, Azza A. El-Housseiny, Najlaa M. Alamoudi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-03-01
Series:Dentistry Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28
_version_ 1798038609543036928
author Afnan M. Saber
Azza A. El-Housseiny
Najlaa M. Alamoudi
author_facet Afnan M. Saber
Azza A. El-Housseiny
Najlaa M. Alamoudi
author_sort Afnan M. Saber
collection DOAJ
description This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:42:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8d7df1b90bc49fa85e50f8d8e081324
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2304-6767
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:42:32Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Dentistry Journal
spelling doaj.art-e8d7df1b90bc49fa85e50f8d8e0813242022-12-22T04:01:33ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672019-03-01712810.3390/dj7010028dj7010028Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the LiteratureAfnan M. Saber0Azza A. El-Housseiny1Najlaa M. Alamoudi2Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaThis review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28atraumatic restorative treatmentinterim therapeutic restorationglass ionomer cementhigh-viscosity glass ionomer
spellingShingle Afnan M. Saber
Azza A. El-Housseiny
Najlaa M. Alamoudi
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
Dentistry Journal
atraumatic restorative treatment
interim therapeutic restoration
glass ionomer cement
high-viscosity glass ionomer
title Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
title_full Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
title_short Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
title_sort atraumatic restorative treatment and interim therapeutic restoration a review of the literature
topic atraumatic restorative treatment
interim therapeutic restoration
glass ionomer cement
high-viscosity glass ionomer
url http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28
work_keys_str_mv AT afnanmsaber atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature
AT azzaaelhousseiny atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature
AT najlaamalamoudi atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature