Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature
This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of t...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-03-01
|
Series: | Dentistry Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28 |
_version_ | 1798038609543036928 |
---|---|
author | Afnan M. Saber Azza A. El-Housseiny Najlaa M. Alamoudi |
author_facet | Afnan M. Saber Azza A. El-Housseiny Najlaa M. Alamoudi |
author_sort | Afnan M. Saber |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:42:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e8d7df1b90bc49fa85e50f8d8e081324 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2304-6767 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:42:32Z |
publishDate | 2019-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Dentistry Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-e8d7df1b90bc49fa85e50f8d8e0813242022-12-22T04:01:33ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672019-03-01712810.3390/dj7010028dj7010028Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the LiteratureAfnan M. Saber0Azza A. El-Housseiny1Najlaa M. Alamoudi2Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaPediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, 21589 Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaThis review discusses the techniques and uses of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and interim therapeutic restoration (ITR) and states the differences between these two approaches. ART and ITR are similar approaches and are performed using the same material, but they differ in the purpose of their use. ART is used in cases when there are obstacles to reaching dental care units and has been proven to have high success rates in primary and permanent dentitions. ITR is used as a temporary restoration that will be replaced with a more definitive one. ITR is used in cases when the ideal dental treatment cannot be performed. Conventional glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) restorative cement (GIC) is the material of choice that has been used for ART and ITR. This is because of its fluoride release properties, including its ability to bond to enamel and dentine, its pulpal biocompatibility, and its ease of manipulation. High-viscosity glass ionomer performed better than low and medium-viscosity glass ionomer in ART. Combining GIC with conditioner, as well as the use of a chemo-mechanical approach, improved the success rate of ART. Both ATR and ITR are acceptable strategies, with success rates comparable to the traditional treatment methods.http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28atraumatic restorative treatmentinterim therapeutic restorationglass ionomer cementhigh-viscosity glass ionomer |
spellingShingle | Afnan M. Saber Azza A. El-Housseiny Najlaa M. Alamoudi Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature Dentistry Journal atraumatic restorative treatment interim therapeutic restoration glass ionomer cement high-viscosity glass ionomer |
title | Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature |
title_full | Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature |
title_fullStr | Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature |
title_short | Atraumatic Restorative Treatment and Interim Therapeutic Restoration: A Review of the Literature |
title_sort | atraumatic restorative treatment and interim therapeutic restoration a review of the literature |
topic | atraumatic restorative treatment interim therapeutic restoration glass ionomer cement high-viscosity glass ionomer |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/7/1/28 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT afnanmsaber atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature AT azzaaelhousseiny atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature AT najlaamalamoudi atraumaticrestorativetreatmentandinterimtherapeuticrestorationareviewoftheliterature |