Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis

Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (CS) regarding the use of volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixation (EF) in distal radius fractures was to determine whether there was any evidence that one treatment was superior to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jie Wang, Yandong Lu, Yujie Cui, Xuelei Wei, Jie Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AVES 2018-09-01
Series:Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1017995X1830066X
_version_ 1797919814740606976
author Jie Wang
Yandong Lu
Yujie Cui
Xuelei Wei
Jie Sun
author_facet Jie Wang
Yandong Lu
Yujie Cui
Xuelei Wei
Jie Sun
author_sort Jie Wang
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (CS) regarding the use of volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixation (EF) in distal radius fractures was to determine whether there was any evidence that one treatment was superior to the other. Methods: The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electrical databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library) were retrieved to find RCTs and CSs met the eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality, and performed data analysis with RevMan 5.1. The publication bias was test by Stata 14.0. The Begg's and Egger's test were performed by Stata 14.0. The quality of evidence was graded according to the criteria of GRADE. We ultimately included ten RCTs and eleven CSs. Results: A total of 1590 subjects were reported. Publication bias was detected by funnel plot in RCTs. VLP could provide better results such as DASH scores (RCT: MD = −6.12, 95%CI = −12.07–0.17; CS: MD = −6.43, 95%CI = −12.53–0.3), ulnar variance (RCT: MD = −0.81, 95%CI = −1.25–0.37) and infection rate (RCT: RR = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.10–0.65; CS: RR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.06–0.40). There were no significant differences for G-W scores, VAS and grip strength between the VLP group and EF group. There was significantly greater loss of volar tilt (P = 0.01) and radial inclination (P = 0.02) in patients receiving EF, basing on the CSs. Conclusions: VLP could provide better results, such as DASH scores, ulnar variance, volar tilt, radial inclination and infection rate. The use of VLP appear to be associated with better results of ROM (flexion, pronation, supination and radial deviation), radiographic parameters (volar tilt and radial inclination) and lower total complication rate and CRPS rate in CSs. Level of evidence: Level 1, Therapeutic study. Keywords: Distal radial fractures, Volar locking plate, External fixation, Meta-analysis, GRADE analysis
first_indexed 2024-04-10T13:52:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8d976068a6b418ab85433535f661cd9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1017-995X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T13:52:36Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher AVES
record_format Article
series Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
spelling doaj.art-e8d976068a6b418ab85433535f661cd92023-02-15T16:10:39ZengAVESActa Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica1017-995X2018-09-01525334342Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysisJie Wang0Yandong Lu1Yujie Cui2Xuelei Wei3Jie Sun4Department of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaDepartment of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaCorresponding author. Tel.: +86 60911000.; Department of Orthopaedic Traumatology, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, ChinaObjective: The aim of this meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) and retrospective cohort studies (CS) regarding the use of volar locking plate (VLP) and external fixation (EF) in distal radius fractures was to determine whether there was any evidence that one treatment was superior to the other. Methods: The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Electrical databases (PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library) were retrieved to find RCTs and CSs met the eligibility criteria. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and evaluated the methodological quality, and performed data analysis with RevMan 5.1. The publication bias was test by Stata 14.0. The Begg's and Egger's test were performed by Stata 14.0. The quality of evidence was graded according to the criteria of GRADE. We ultimately included ten RCTs and eleven CSs. Results: A total of 1590 subjects were reported. Publication bias was detected by funnel plot in RCTs. VLP could provide better results such as DASH scores (RCT: MD = −6.12, 95%CI = −12.07–0.17; CS: MD = −6.43, 95%CI = −12.53–0.3), ulnar variance (RCT: MD = −0.81, 95%CI = −1.25–0.37) and infection rate (RCT: RR = 0.25, 95%CI = 0.10–0.65; CS: RR = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.06–0.40). There were no significant differences for G-W scores, VAS and grip strength between the VLP group and EF group. There was significantly greater loss of volar tilt (P = 0.01) and radial inclination (P = 0.02) in patients receiving EF, basing on the CSs. Conclusions: VLP could provide better results, such as DASH scores, ulnar variance, volar tilt, radial inclination and infection rate. The use of VLP appear to be associated with better results of ROM (flexion, pronation, supination and radial deviation), radiographic parameters (volar tilt and radial inclination) and lower total complication rate and CRPS rate in CSs. Level of evidence: Level 1, Therapeutic study. Keywords: Distal radial fractures, Volar locking plate, External fixation, Meta-analysis, GRADE analysishttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1017995X1830066X
spellingShingle Jie Wang
Yandong Lu
Yujie Cui
Xuelei Wei
Jie Sun
Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
title Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
title_full Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
title_fullStr Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
title_short Is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures? A comprehensive meta-analysis
title_sort is volar locking plate superior to external fixation for distal radius fractures a comprehensive meta analysis
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1017995X1830066X
work_keys_str_mv AT jiewang isvolarlockingplatesuperiortoexternalfixationfordistalradiusfracturesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT yandonglu isvolarlockingplatesuperiortoexternalfixationfordistalradiusfracturesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT yujiecui isvolarlockingplatesuperiortoexternalfixationfordistalradiusfracturesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT xueleiwei isvolarlockingplatesuperiortoexternalfixationfordistalradiusfracturesacomprehensivemetaanalysis
AT jiesun isvolarlockingplatesuperiortoexternalfixationfordistalradiusfracturesacomprehensivemetaanalysis