Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions

We consider Russian coordinative constructions with paired conjunctions, such as i…i ‘both…and’, ili…ili ‘either…or’, ni…ni ‘neither…nor’, ne tol'ko…no i ‘not only…but also’, ne…a ‘not…but’, etc. The paper presents a class of syntactic constructions, so-called asymmetric constructions,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boguslavskij I.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade 2013-01-01
Series:Južnoslovenski Filolog
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2013/0350-185X1369115B.pdf
_version_ 1818047763686883328
author Boguslavskij I.M.
author_facet Boguslavskij I.M.
author_sort Boguslavskij I.M.
collection DOAJ
description We consider Russian coordinative constructions with paired conjunctions, such as i…i ‘both…and’, ili…ili ‘either…or’, ni…ni ‘neither…nor’, ne tol'ko…no i ‘not only…but also’, ne…a ‘not…but’, etc. The paper presents a class of syntactic constructions, so-called asymmetric constructions, which are interesting in several respects. They are closely related to coordinative constructions, although they do not share their principal property - the identity of syntactic functions of coordinated elements. They take up an intermediate position between standard syntax and ungrammaticality. On the one hand, the sentence is within the grammatical norm. On the other hand, its structure underwent a deformation that left a trace. We propose a description that accounts for their closeness to and difference from standard - symmetric - constructions. Symmetric constructions with paired conjunctions are convenient to describe as a result of two transformations occurring in the semantic structure: Deletion and Transfer. Asymmetric constructions are obtained when only one of these transformations is applied. Accordingly, two subclasses of asymmetric constructions can be distinguished - “Deletion-Without-Transfer” constructions and “Transfer-Without-Deletion” constructions. The latter class has a strong pragmatic marking. The core of this class are “failed” symmetric constructions. The speaker begins to build a symmetric construction but faces an obstacle of syntactic nature, which prevents him from completing this plan. “Transfer-Without-Deletion” constructions constitute a legalized way of overcoming syntactic conflicts.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T10:10:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8dc4696851e446b9f583ab2246765c4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0350-185X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T10:10:58Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, Belgrade
record_format Article
series Južnoslovenski Filolog
spelling doaj.art-e8dc4696851e446b9f583ab2246765c42022-12-22T01:53:08ZengSerbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute for the Serbian Language, BelgradeJužnoslovenski Filolog0350-185X2013-01-0120136911513510.2298/JFI1369115B0350-185X1369115BGrammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructionsBoguslavskij I.M.0Institut problem peredači informacii im. A.A. Harkeviča RAN, Moskva, RussiaWe consider Russian coordinative constructions with paired conjunctions, such as i…i ‘both…and’, ili…ili ‘either…or’, ni…ni ‘neither…nor’, ne tol'ko…no i ‘not only…but also’, ne…a ‘not…but’, etc. The paper presents a class of syntactic constructions, so-called asymmetric constructions, which are interesting in several respects. They are closely related to coordinative constructions, although they do not share their principal property - the identity of syntactic functions of coordinated elements. They take up an intermediate position between standard syntax and ungrammaticality. On the one hand, the sentence is within the grammatical norm. On the other hand, its structure underwent a deformation that left a trace. We propose a description that accounts for their closeness to and difference from standard - symmetric - constructions. Symmetric constructions with paired conjunctions are convenient to describe as a result of two transformations occurring in the semantic structure: Deletion and Transfer. Asymmetric constructions are obtained when only one of these transformations is applied. Accordingly, two subclasses of asymmetric constructions can be distinguished - “Deletion-Without-Transfer” constructions and “Transfer-Without-Deletion” constructions. The latter class has a strong pragmatic marking. The core of this class are “failed” symmetric constructions. The speaker begins to build a symmetric construction but faces an obstacle of syntactic nature, which prevents him from completing this plan. “Transfer-Without-Deletion” constructions constitute a legalized way of overcoming syntactic conflicts.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2013/0350-185X1369115B.pdfsyntactic conflictpragmaticssyntaxcoordinationpaired conjunctions
spellingShingle Boguslavskij I.M.
Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
Južnoslovenski Filolog
syntactic conflict
pragmatics
syntax
coordination
paired conjunctions
title Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
title_full Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
title_fullStr Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
title_full_unstemmed Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
title_short Grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution: Asymmetric constructions
title_sort grammaticalization of syntactic conflict resolution asymmetric constructions
topic syntactic conflict
pragmatics
syntax
coordination
paired conjunctions
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0350-185X/2013/0350-185X1369115B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT boguslavskijim grammaticalizationofsyntacticconflictresolutionasymmetricconstructions