A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers

Abstract Background The Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine is characterized by indiscriminate attacks on civilian infrastructure, including hospitals and clinics that have devastated the Ukrainian health system putting trauma care at risk. International healthcare providers responded to the ne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lynn Lieberman Lawry, Jessica Korona-Bailey, Luke Juman, Miranda Janvrin, Valentina Donici, Iurii Kychyn, John Maddox, Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-01-01
Series:Conflict and Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00570-z
_version_ 1797276508902916096
author Lynn Lieberman Lawry
Jessica Korona-Bailey
Luke Juman
Miranda Janvrin
Valentina Donici
Iurii Kychyn
John Maddox
Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
author_facet Lynn Lieberman Lawry
Jessica Korona-Bailey
Luke Juman
Miranda Janvrin
Valentina Donici
Iurii Kychyn
John Maddox
Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
author_sort Lynn Lieberman Lawry
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine is characterized by indiscriminate attacks on civilian infrastructure, including hospitals and clinics that have devastated the Ukrainian health system putting trauma care at risk. International healthcare providers responded to the need for help with the increasing numbers of trauma patients. We aimed to describe their experiences during the conflict to explore the gaps in systems and care for trauma patients to refine the Global Trauma System Evaluation Tool (G-TSET) tool. Methods We conducted qualitative key informant interviews of healthcare providers and business and logistics experts who volunteered since February 2022. Respondents were recruited using purposive snow-ball sampling. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted virtually from January-March 2023 using a modified version of the G-TSET as an interview guide. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and deductive thematic content analysis was conducted using NVivo. Findings We interviewed a total of 26 returned volunteers. Ukraine’s trauma system is outdated for both administrative and trauma response practices. Communication between levels of the patient evacuation process was a recurrent concern which relied on handwritten notes. Patient care was impacted by limited equipment resources, such as ventilators, and improper infection control procedures. Prehospital care was described as highly variable in terms of quality, while others witnessed limited or no prehospital care. The inability to adequately move patients to higher levels of care affected the quality of care. Infection control was a key issue at the hospital level where handwashing was not common. Structured guidelines for trauma response were lacking and lead to a lack of standardization of care and for trauma. Although training was desired, patient loads from the conflict prohibited the ability to participate. Rehabilitation care was stated to be limited. Conclusion Standardizing the trauma care system to include guidelines, better training, improved prehospital care and transportation, and supply of equipment will address the most critical gaps in the trauma system. Rehabilitation services will be necessary as the conflict continues into its second year.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:30:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8e433799f9e4fc1b432b2b6f22ae0ff
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1752-1505
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:30:11Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Conflict and Health
spelling doaj.art-e8e433799f9e4fc1b432b2b6f22ae0ff2024-03-05T16:31:36ZengBMCConflict and Health1752-15052024-01-011811810.1186/s13031-024-00570-zA qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providersLynn Lieberman Lawry0Jessica Korona-Bailey1Luke Juman2Miranda Janvrin3Valentina Donici4Iurii Kychyn5John Maddox6Tracey Perez Koehlmoos7Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services UniversityHenry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc.Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc.Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc.Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services UniversityBogomolets National Medical UniversityPreventive Medicine and Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services UniversityPreventive Medicine and Biostatistics Department, Uniformed Services UniversityAbstract Background The Russian Federation’s invasion of Ukraine is characterized by indiscriminate attacks on civilian infrastructure, including hospitals and clinics that have devastated the Ukrainian health system putting trauma care at risk. International healthcare providers responded to the need for help with the increasing numbers of trauma patients. We aimed to describe their experiences during the conflict to explore the gaps in systems and care for trauma patients to refine the Global Trauma System Evaluation Tool (G-TSET) tool. Methods We conducted qualitative key informant interviews of healthcare providers and business and logistics experts who volunteered since February 2022. Respondents were recruited using purposive snow-ball sampling. Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted virtually from January-March 2023 using a modified version of the G-TSET as an interview guide. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and deductive thematic content analysis was conducted using NVivo. Findings We interviewed a total of 26 returned volunteers. Ukraine’s trauma system is outdated for both administrative and trauma response practices. Communication between levels of the patient evacuation process was a recurrent concern which relied on handwritten notes. Patient care was impacted by limited equipment resources, such as ventilators, and improper infection control procedures. Prehospital care was described as highly variable in terms of quality, while others witnessed limited or no prehospital care. The inability to adequately move patients to higher levels of care affected the quality of care. Infection control was a key issue at the hospital level where handwashing was not common. Structured guidelines for trauma response were lacking and lead to a lack of standardization of care and for trauma. Although training was desired, patient loads from the conflict prohibited the ability to participate. Rehabilitation care was stated to be limited. Conclusion Standardizing the trauma care system to include guidelines, better training, improved prehospital care and transportation, and supply of equipment will address the most critical gaps in the trauma system. Rehabilitation services will be necessary as the conflict continues into its second year.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00570-zUkraineTrauma systemsEmergency medical systemsConflict health
spellingShingle Lynn Lieberman Lawry
Jessica Korona-Bailey
Luke Juman
Miranda Janvrin
Valentina Donici
Iurii Kychyn
John Maddox
Tracey Perez Koehlmoos
A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
Conflict and Health
Ukraine
Trauma systems
Emergency medical systems
Conflict health
title A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
title_full A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
title_fullStr A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
title_full_unstemmed A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
title_short A qualitative assessment of Ukraine’s trauma system during the Russian conflict: experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
title_sort qualitative assessment of ukraine s trauma system during the russian conflict experiences of volunteer healthcare providers
topic Ukraine
Trauma systems
Emergency medical systems
Conflict health
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-024-00570-z
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnliebermanlawry aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT jessicakoronabailey aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT lukejuman aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT mirandajanvrin aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT valentinadonici aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT iuriikychyn aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT johnmaddox aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT traceyperezkoehlmoos aqualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT lynnliebermanlawry qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT jessicakoronabailey qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT lukejuman qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT mirandajanvrin qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT valentinadonici qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT iuriikychyn qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT johnmaddox qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders
AT traceyperezkoehlmoos qualitativeassessmentofukrainestraumasystemduringtherussianconflictexperiencesofvolunteerhealthcareproviders