Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study

Background: Resource cuts to primary and community care in combination with a decline of those working in community settings is compromising quality of care and patient safety in the UK. It is reported that the negative consequences of understaffing and underfunding have worsened due to the COVID-19...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michaela Senek, Steven Robertson, Bethany Taylor, Emily Wood, Rachel King, Tony Ryan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X22000145
_version_ 1818288847897755648
author Michaela Senek
Steven Robertson
Bethany Taylor
Emily Wood
Rachel King
Tony Ryan
author_facet Michaela Senek
Steven Robertson
Bethany Taylor
Emily Wood
Rachel King
Tony Ryan
author_sort Michaela Senek
collection DOAJ
description Background: Resource cuts to primary and community care in combination with a decline of those working in community settings is compromising quality of care and patient safety in the UK. It is reported that the negative consequences of understaffing and underfunding have worsened due to the COVID-19 pandemic.Objective: This is a cross-sectional study that aimed to examine short and long-term District and Community nursing working conditions. The objectives were to assess the prevalence of understaffing and missed care and the relationship between individual and organisational factors and their association with missed care outcome. We further explored the relationship between additional caseload, staffing levels and missed care.Methods: We developed a questionnaire based on the validated MISSCARE survey. Outcome measures were, number of vacancies per team, staffing levels, reported incidence of missed care, type of missed care, length of shift and overtime.Results: Only 23% of teams reported having no vacancies. The mean staffing ratio was reported at 60%, including agency/bank staff (0.59±1.5). Prevalence of missed care was relatively high (60%≈). The distribution of types of missed care was spread evenly across all types of nursing care. A backward stepwise regression analysis showed that the Proportion of Permanent staff capacity OR=7.9 (95% CI 0.09-0.65), Active Caseload Size OR= 5.5 (95% CI: 1.0 – 1.003), Number of RNs on the team (OR 4.8 (95% CI:1.003-1.058) and Amount of Overtime worked (OR= 3.9 (95% CI:0.98-1.0) variable are statistically significant predictors of missed care. The analysis showed an increase in additional allocated cases per RN as the permanent staff proportion decreased to 70%, at which point the likelihood of reported Missed Care outcome peaks.Conclusion: The compromised quality of care related to human resources and organisational aspects of the nursing process. Where RNs worked longer hours to make up for the backlog of cases, the prevalence of missed care was more likely. Longer working hours in the community increased the risk of compromised care and sub-optimal patient care. The aspects of the nursing process identified as ‘missed’ related to The World Health Organisation's three main pillars of community nursing (health promotion, patient education and screening). As such, significant components of the two first pillars are, according to these data, being undermined.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T02:02:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e8e76eeeb0a94febbeaedaf509682e69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-142X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T02:02:54Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
spelling doaj.art-e8e76eeeb0a94febbeaedaf509682e692022-12-22T00:03:13ZengElsevierInternational Journal of Nursing Studies Advances2666-142X2022-12-014100075Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional studyMichaela Senek0Steven Robertson1Bethany Taylor2Emily Wood3Rachel King4Tony Ryan5Corresponding author at: The University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ United Kingdom, Telephone: +447788661390; The University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomThe University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomThe University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomThe University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomThe University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomThe University of Sheffield, Health Sciences School, 387 Glossop Road, Sheffield S10 2HQ, United KingdomBackground: Resource cuts to primary and community care in combination with a decline of those working in community settings is compromising quality of care and patient safety in the UK. It is reported that the negative consequences of understaffing and underfunding have worsened due to the COVID-19 pandemic.Objective: This is a cross-sectional study that aimed to examine short and long-term District and Community nursing working conditions. The objectives were to assess the prevalence of understaffing and missed care and the relationship between individual and organisational factors and their association with missed care outcome. We further explored the relationship between additional caseload, staffing levels and missed care.Methods: We developed a questionnaire based on the validated MISSCARE survey. Outcome measures were, number of vacancies per team, staffing levels, reported incidence of missed care, type of missed care, length of shift and overtime.Results: Only 23% of teams reported having no vacancies. The mean staffing ratio was reported at 60%, including agency/bank staff (0.59±1.5). Prevalence of missed care was relatively high (60%≈). The distribution of types of missed care was spread evenly across all types of nursing care. A backward stepwise regression analysis showed that the Proportion of Permanent staff capacity OR=7.9 (95% CI 0.09-0.65), Active Caseload Size OR= 5.5 (95% CI: 1.0 – 1.003), Number of RNs on the team (OR 4.8 (95% CI:1.003-1.058) and Amount of Overtime worked (OR= 3.9 (95% CI:0.98-1.0) variable are statistically significant predictors of missed care. The analysis showed an increase in additional allocated cases per RN as the permanent staff proportion decreased to 70%, at which point the likelihood of reported Missed Care outcome peaks.Conclusion: The compromised quality of care related to human resources and organisational aspects of the nursing process. Where RNs worked longer hours to make up for the backlog of cases, the prevalence of missed care was more likely. Longer working hours in the community increased the risk of compromised care and sub-optimal patient care. The aspects of the nursing process identified as ‘missed’ related to The World Health Organisation's three main pillars of community nursing (health promotion, patient education and screening). As such, significant components of the two first pillars are, according to these data, being undermined.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X22000145Community nursingUnderstaffingMissed careUnfinished nursing care
spellingShingle Michaela Senek
Steven Robertson
Bethany Taylor
Emily Wood
Rachel King
Tony Ryan
Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Community nursing
Understaffing
Missed care
Unfinished nursing care
title Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
title_full Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
title_short Consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care- a cross-sectional study
title_sort consequences of understaffing on type of missed community care a cross sectional study
topic Community nursing
Understaffing
Missed care
Unfinished nursing care
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666142X22000145
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelasenek consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT stevenrobertson consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT bethanytaylor consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT emilywood consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT rachelking consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy
AT tonyryan consequencesofunderstaffingontypeofmissedcommunitycareacrosssectionalstudy