Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glas...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Materials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440 |
_version_ | 1797413221074731008 |
---|---|
author | Philipp Messer-Hannemann Mariam Samadi Henrik Böttcher Sebastian Duy Daniela Duy Niclas Albrecht Falk Schwendicke Susanne Effenberger |
author_facet | Philipp Messer-Hannemann Mariam Samadi Henrik Böttcher Sebastian Duy Daniela Duy Niclas Albrecht Falk Schwendicke Susanne Effenberger |
author_sort | Philipp Messer-Hannemann |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (<i>p</i> = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T05:14:30Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e90b274e3bd2409f860e52f12db17fd7 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1996-1944 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T05:14:30Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Materials |
spelling | doaj.art-e90b274e3bd2409f860e52f12db17fd72023-12-03T12:46:48ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-08-011515544010.3390/ma15155440Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic LoadingPhilipp Messer-Hannemann0Mariam Samadi1Henrik Böttcher2Sebastian Duy3Daniela Duy4Niclas Albrecht5Falk Schwendicke6Susanne Effenberger7DMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanyDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyThe aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (<i>p</i> = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440glass ionomerdental restorative materialchewing simulationClass I restorationwear resistance |
spellingShingle | Philipp Messer-Hannemann Mariam Samadi Henrik Böttcher Sebastian Duy Daniela Duy Niclas Albrecht Falk Schwendicke Susanne Effenberger Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading Materials glass ionomer dental restorative material chewing simulation Class I restoration wear resistance |
title | Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading |
title_full | Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading |
title_short | Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading |
title_sort | evaluation of a method to determine wear resistance of class i tooth restorations during cyclic loading |
topic | glass ionomer dental restorative material chewing simulation Class I restoration wear resistance |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philippmesserhannemann evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT mariamsamadi evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT henrikbottcher evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT sebastianduy evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT danieladuy evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT niclasalbrecht evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT falkschwendicke evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading AT susanneeffenberger evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading |