Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading

The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philipp Messer-Hannemann, Mariam Samadi, Henrik Böttcher, Sebastian Duy, Daniela Duy, Niclas Albrecht, Falk Schwendicke, Susanne Effenberger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440
_version_ 1797413221074731008
author Philipp Messer-Hannemann
Mariam Samadi
Henrik Böttcher
Sebastian Duy
Daniela Duy
Niclas Albrecht
Falk Schwendicke
Susanne Effenberger
author_facet Philipp Messer-Hannemann
Mariam Samadi
Henrik Böttcher
Sebastian Duy
Daniela Duy
Niclas Albrecht
Falk Schwendicke
Susanne Effenberger
author_sort Philipp Messer-Hannemann
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (<i>p</i> = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:14:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e90b274e3bd2409f860e52f12db17fd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-1944
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:14:30Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Materials
spelling doaj.art-e90b274e3bd2409f860e52f12db17fd72023-12-03T12:46:48ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442022-08-011515544010.3390/ma15155440Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic LoadingPhilipp Messer-Hannemann0Mariam Samadi1Henrik Böttcher2Sebastian Duy3Daniela Duy4Niclas Albrecht5Falk Schwendicke6Susanne Effenberger7DMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanySD Mechatronik GmbH, 83620 Feldkirchen-Westerham, GermanyDepartment of Oral Diagnostics, Digital Health and Health Services Research, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 14197 Berlin, GermanyDMG Dental-Material Gesellschaft mbH, 22547 Hamburg, GermanyThe aim of this study was the development of a test regime to determine the wear resistance and predict the clinical performance of conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations in Class I tooth cavities. Cavities were prepared in excised human teeth and restored using three conventional glass ionomer restorative materials: DeltaFil, Fuji IX GP and Ketac Universal. The restored teeth were mechanically and thermally stressed using a chewing simulator with a maximum number of 1,200,000 load cycles. Besides determining the number of cycles achieved, the abrasion volume after termination of the chewing simulation was calculated using µCT images. All teeth restored with DeltaFil reached 1,200,000 cycles without any restoration failure. Only 37.5% of the restorations each with Ketac Universal and Fuji IX GP were able to achieve the maximum cycle number. A significant lower abrasion volume for restorations with DeltaFil compared to Ketac Universal (<i>p</i> = 0.0099) and Fuji IX GP (<i>p</i> = 0.0005) was found. Laboratory chewing simulations are a useful tool to study basic wear mechanisms in a controlled setting with in-vivo related parameters. DeltaFil shows an improved wear resistance compared to other conventional GICs, indicating the high potential of this material for long-lasting Class I restorations.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440glass ionomerdental restorative materialchewing simulationClass I restorationwear resistance
spellingShingle Philipp Messer-Hannemann
Mariam Samadi
Henrik Böttcher
Sebastian Duy
Daniela Duy
Niclas Albrecht
Falk Schwendicke
Susanne Effenberger
Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
Materials
glass ionomer
dental restorative material
chewing simulation
Class I restoration
wear resistance
title Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_full Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_fullStr Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_short Evaluation of a Method to Determine Wear Resistance of Class I Tooth Restorations during Cyclic Loading
title_sort evaluation of a method to determine wear resistance of class i tooth restorations during cyclic loading
topic glass ionomer
dental restorative material
chewing simulation
Class I restoration
wear resistance
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/15/15/5440
work_keys_str_mv AT philippmesserhannemann evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT mariamsamadi evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT henrikbottcher evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT sebastianduy evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT danieladuy evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT niclasalbrecht evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT falkschwendicke evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading
AT susanneeffenberger evaluationofamethodtodeterminewearresistanceofclassitoothrestorationsduringcyclicloading