Post-trial follow-up methodology in large randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
Abstract Background Randomised controlled clinical trials typically have a relatively brief in-trial follow-up period which can underestimate safety signals and fail to detect long-term hazards, which may take years to appear. Extended follow-up after the scheduled closure of the trial allows detect...
Main Authors: | Rebecca Llewellyn-Bennett, Danielle Edwards, Nia Roberts, Atticus H. Hainsworth, Richard Bulbulia, Louise Bowman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-018-2653-0 |
Similar Items
-
Trial Forge Guidance 3: randomised trials and how to recruit and retain individuals from ethnic minority groups—practical guidance to support better practice
by: Shoba Dawson, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01) -
Using re-randomisation designs to increase the efficiency and applicability of retention studies within trials: a case study
by: Beatriz Goulao, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01) -
Randomised study within a trial (SWAT) to evaluate personalised versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to postal questionnaires (PROMPTS)
by: Lucy Cureton, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
How much is the lack of retention evidence costing trial teams in Ireland and the UK?
by: Ellen Murphy, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
Non-randomised evaluations of strategies to increase participant retention in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review
by: Adel Elfeky, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)