Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?

Objective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares, Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros, Giselle Valério Teixeira da Silva, Lucas Pereira Carlini, Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich, Rafael Nobre Orsi, Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda, Pedro Augusto Santos Orona Silva, Carlos Eduardo Thomaz, Ruth Guinsburg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-07-01
Series:Jornal de Pediatria
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755721001613
_version_ 1811193003003346944
author Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares
Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros
Giselle Valério Teixeira da Silva
Lucas Pereira Carlini
Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich
Rafael Nobre Orsi
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Pedro Augusto Santos Orona Silva
Carlos Eduardo Thomaz
Ruth Guinsburg
author_facet Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares
Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros
Giselle Valério Teixeira da Silva
Lucas Pereira Carlini
Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich
Rafael Nobre Orsi
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Pedro Augusto Santos Orona Silva
Carlos Eduardo Thomaz
Ruth Guinsburg
author_sort Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares
collection DOAJ
description Objective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, who evaluated two images of 10 neonates, one at rest and the other during a painful procedure. Each image was shown for 7 seconds on a computer screen, while eye movements were tracked by the Tobii TX300 EyeTracker. After evaluating each image, participants gave a score from 0 (absent pain) to 10 (maximum pain), according to their perception of neonatal pain. For each image, the number and total time of gaze fixations in the forehead, eyes, nasolabial furrow, and mouth were studied. Comparisons between both groups of adults were made by an intraclass correlation coefficient, Student's t-test, and Bland Altman graphic. Results: Health professionals (93% female; 34 ± 9 years old), compared to non-health professionals (64% female; 35 ± 11 years old), gave lower scores for images at rest (0.81 ± 0.50 vs. 1.59 ± 0.76; p = 0.010), with no difference for those obtained during the painful procedure (6.98 ± 1.08 vs. 6.73 ± 0.82). There was a strong or almost perfect correlation for the number of fixations in the mouth, eyes, forehead, and for the total fixation time in the eyes and forehead. Conclusions: Adults, irrespective of their profession, showed a homogeneous gaze pattern when evaluating pictures of neonates at rest or during a painful procedures.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T00:00:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e92e4cc45b7f4d38a6e5f6fe7cfc9049
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0021-7557
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T00:00:02Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Jornal de Pediatria
spelling doaj.art-e92e4cc45b7f4d38a6e5f6fe7cfc90492022-12-22T03:56:15ZengElsevierJornal de Pediatria0021-75572022-07-01984406412Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares0Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros1Giselle Valério Teixeira da Silva2Lucas Pereira Carlini3Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich4Rafael Nobre Orsi5Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda6Pedro Augusto Santos Orona Silva7Carlos Eduardo Thomaz8Ruth Guinsburg9Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Corresponding author.Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, BrazilCentro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, BrazilCentro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, BrazilCentro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, BrazilCentro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, BrazilCentro Universitario FEI, Department of Electrical Engineering, Image Processing Laboratory, São Bernardo do Campo, SP, BrazilUniversidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatal Medicine, São Paulo, SP, BrazilObjective: To analyze the regions that trigger the attention of adults’ gaze when assessing pain in newborn infants’ pictures and to verify if there are differences between health and non-health professionals. Method: Experimental study with 84 health professionals and 59 non-health professionals, who evaluated two images of 10 neonates, one at rest and the other during a painful procedure. Each image was shown for 7 seconds on a computer screen, while eye movements were tracked by the Tobii TX300 EyeTracker. After evaluating each image, participants gave a score from 0 (absent pain) to 10 (maximum pain), according to their perception of neonatal pain. For each image, the number and total time of gaze fixations in the forehead, eyes, nasolabial furrow, and mouth were studied. Comparisons between both groups of adults were made by an intraclass correlation coefficient, Student's t-test, and Bland Altman graphic. Results: Health professionals (93% female; 34 ± 9 years old), compared to non-health professionals (64% female; 35 ± 11 years old), gave lower scores for images at rest (0.81 ± 0.50 vs. 1.59 ± 0.76; p = 0.010), with no difference for those obtained during the painful procedure (6.98 ± 1.08 vs. 6.73 ± 0.82). There was a strong or almost perfect correlation for the number of fixations in the mouth, eyes, forehead, and for the total fixation time in the eyes and forehead. Conclusions: Adults, irrespective of their profession, showed a homogeneous gaze pattern when evaluating pictures of neonates at rest or during a painful procedures.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755721001613InfantnewbornPain perceptionFacial expressionEye-tracking technologyHealth personnel
spellingShingle Juliana do Carmo Azevedo Soares
Marina Carvalho de Moraes Barros
Giselle Valério Teixeira da Silva
Lucas Pereira Carlini
Tatiany Marcondes Heiderich
Rafael Nobre Orsi
Rita de Cássia Xavier Balda
Pedro Augusto Santos Orona Silva
Carlos Eduardo Thomaz
Ruth Guinsburg
Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
Jornal de Pediatria
Infant
newborn
Pain perception
Facial expression
Eye-tracking technology
Health personnel
title Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_full Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_fullStr Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_full_unstemmed Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_short Looking at neonatal facial features of pain: do health and non-health professionals differ?
title_sort looking at neonatal facial features of pain do health and non health professionals differ
topic Infant
newborn
Pain perception
Facial expression
Eye-tracking technology
Health personnel
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0021755721001613
work_keys_str_mv AT julianadocarmoazevedosoares lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT marinacarvalhodemoraesbarros lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT gisellevalerioteixeiradasilva lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT lucaspereiracarlini lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT tatianymarcondesheiderich lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT rafaelnobreorsi lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT ritadecassiaxavierbalda lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT pedroaugustosantosoronasilva lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT carloseduardothomaz lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer
AT ruthguinsburg lookingatneonatalfacialfeaturesofpaindohealthandnonhealthprofessionalsdiffer