The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial

Abstract Background Inhalation of nebulised medications is performed in upright sitting to maximise lung volumes. The pattern of deposition is poor for inhaled medications in people with Cystic Fibrosis. The pattern tends to be non-uniform and typically the upper lobes receive a reduced dose compare...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruth L. Dentice, Mark R. Elkins, Genevieve M. Dwyer, Peter T. P. Bye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-01-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-017-0568-2
_version_ 1819091018991009792
author Ruth L. Dentice
Mark R. Elkins
Genevieve M. Dwyer
Peter T. P. Bye
author_facet Ruth L. Dentice
Mark R. Elkins
Genevieve M. Dwyer
Peter T. P. Bye
author_sort Ruth L. Dentice
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Inhalation of nebulised medications is performed in upright sitting to maximise lung volumes. The pattern of deposition is poor for inhaled medications in people with Cystic Fibrosis. The pattern tends to be non-uniform and typically the upper lobes receive a reduced dose compared to the rest of the lung. One strategy that has been proposed as having the potential to improve homogeneity of deposition is to adopt an alternate side lying position for the inhalation procedure. This study sought to determine whether, among adults with Cystic Fibrosis, there is any disadvantage to delivery time of nebulised medications with a strategy of alternate side lying, compared to upright sitting. Methods A randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessors was undertaken. The participants were 24 adults with stable Cystic Fibrosis. They inhaled 4 mL of normal saline via an LC Star™ nebuliser twice within 24 h. In random order, participants sat upright throughout nebulisation, or alternated between left and right side lying at each minute during the nebulisation period. The nebuliser was stopped and weighed each minute until the residual volume was reached. The primary outcome was the time required for 3.5 mL to be delivered. The secondary outcomes were: respiratory rate; ratio of the volume delivered on right and left sides; and calculation of how long the periods in side lying can be extended without causing greater than 20% discrepancy in dose delivered in the two positions. Results The delivery time did not significantly differ between sitting and side lying (mean difference 0.58 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.40 to 0.24). There was no significant correlation between delivery time, lung function or subject height (all R2 < 0.4). Increasing side lying duration from 1 to 2 min did not significantly impact the dose delivered on each side. Turning each 3 min however, significantly worsened the disparity (mean ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.40). Conclusion Side lying during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time. 2-min periods should provide an equal dose in the two side lying positions. Trial registration Prospectively registered on 4 July 2011; ACTRN12611000672954 .
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:33:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e935b8320dba4f4db04bc8bc5d4ade12
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2466
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:33:03Z
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-e935b8320dba4f4db04bc8bc5d4ade122022-12-21T18:48:02ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662018-01-011811610.1186/s12890-017-0568-2The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trialRuth L. Dentice0Mark R. Elkins1Genevieve M. Dwyer2Peter T. P. Bye3Physiotherapy Department, Royal Prince Alfred HospitalSydney Medical School, University of SydneyPhysiotherapy Program, Western Sydney UniversitySydney Medical School, University of SydneyAbstract Background Inhalation of nebulised medications is performed in upright sitting to maximise lung volumes. The pattern of deposition is poor for inhaled medications in people with Cystic Fibrosis. The pattern tends to be non-uniform and typically the upper lobes receive a reduced dose compared to the rest of the lung. One strategy that has been proposed as having the potential to improve homogeneity of deposition is to adopt an alternate side lying position for the inhalation procedure. This study sought to determine whether, among adults with Cystic Fibrosis, there is any disadvantage to delivery time of nebulised medications with a strategy of alternate side lying, compared to upright sitting. Methods A randomised crossover trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinded assessors was undertaken. The participants were 24 adults with stable Cystic Fibrosis. They inhaled 4 mL of normal saline via an LC Star™ nebuliser twice within 24 h. In random order, participants sat upright throughout nebulisation, or alternated between left and right side lying at each minute during the nebulisation period. The nebuliser was stopped and weighed each minute until the residual volume was reached. The primary outcome was the time required for 3.5 mL to be delivered. The secondary outcomes were: respiratory rate; ratio of the volume delivered on right and left sides; and calculation of how long the periods in side lying can be extended without causing greater than 20% discrepancy in dose delivered in the two positions. Results The delivery time did not significantly differ between sitting and side lying (mean difference 0.58 min, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.40 to 0.24). There was no significant correlation between delivery time, lung function or subject height (all R2 < 0.4). Increasing side lying duration from 1 to 2 min did not significantly impact the dose delivered on each side. Turning each 3 min however, significantly worsened the disparity (mean ratio 1.32, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.40). Conclusion Side lying during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time. 2-min periods should provide an equal dose in the two side lying positions. Trial registration Prospectively registered on 4 July 2011; ACTRN12611000672954 .http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-017-0568-2Cystic fibrosisBody positionNebuliser delivery rate
spellingShingle Ruth L. Dentice
Mark R. Elkins
Genevieve M. Dwyer
Peter T. P. Bye
The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Cystic fibrosis
Body position
Nebuliser delivery rate
title The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
title_full The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
title_fullStr The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
title_short The use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with Cystic Fibrosis: a randomised crossover trial
title_sort use of an alternate side lying positioning strategy during inhalation therapy does not prolong nebulisation time in adults with cystic fibrosis a randomised crossover trial
topic Cystic fibrosis
Body position
Nebuliser delivery rate
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-017-0568-2
work_keys_str_mv AT ruthldentice theuseofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT markrelkins theuseofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT genevievemdwyer theuseofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT petertpbye theuseofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT ruthldentice useofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT markrelkins useofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT genevievemdwyer useofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial
AT petertpbye useofanalternatesidelyingpositioningstrategyduringinhalationtherapydoesnotprolongnebulisationtimeinadultswithcysticfibrosisarandomisedcrossovertrial