How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review

Abstract Legal problems encompass issues requiring resolution through the justice system. This social risk factor creates barriers in accessing services and increases risk of poor health outcomes. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed English-language health literature following the PRISMA guidel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joshua R. Vest, Rachel J. Hinrichs, Heidi Hosler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:Health & Justice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00246-5
_version_ 1797577478663831552
author Joshua R. Vest
Rachel J. Hinrichs
Heidi Hosler
author_facet Joshua R. Vest
Rachel J. Hinrichs
Heidi Hosler
author_sort Joshua R. Vest
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Legal problems encompass issues requiring resolution through the justice system. This social risk factor creates barriers in accessing services and increases risk of poor health outcomes. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed English-language health literature following the PRISMA guidelines sought to answer the question, how has the concept of patients’ “legal problems” been operationalized in healthcare settings? Eligible articles reported the measurement or screening of individuals for legal problems in a United States healthcare or clinical setting. We abstracted the prevalence of legal problems, characteristics of the sampled population, and which concepts were included. 58 studies reported a total of 82 different measurements of legal problems. 56.8% of measures reflected a single concept (e.g., incarcerated only). The rest of the measures reflected two or more concepts within a single reported measure (e.g., incarcerations and arrests). Among all measures, the concept of incarceration or being imprisoned appeared the most frequently (57%). The mean of the reported legal problems was 26%. The literature indicates that legal concepts, however operationalized, are very common among patients. The variation in measurement definitions and approaches indicates the potential difficulties for organizations seeking to address these challenges.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T22:09:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e94a56dff65c44eea26f8b525fca9eb7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2194-7899
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T22:09:51Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Health & Justice
spelling doaj.art-e94a56dff65c44eea26f8b525fca9eb72023-11-19T12:41:54ZengBMCHealth & Justice2194-78992023-11-011111910.1186/s40352-023-00246-5How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic reviewJoshua R. Vest0Rachel J. Hinrichs1Heidi Hosler2Indiana University Richard M Fairbanks School of Public HealthUniversity Library, Indiana University Purdue University IndianapolisCenter for Biomedical Informatics, Regenstrief InstituteAbstract Legal problems encompass issues requiring resolution through the justice system. This social risk factor creates barriers in accessing services and increases risk of poor health outcomes. A systematic review of the peer-reviewed English-language health literature following the PRISMA guidelines sought to answer the question, how has the concept of patients’ “legal problems” been operationalized in healthcare settings? Eligible articles reported the measurement or screening of individuals for legal problems in a United States healthcare or clinical setting. We abstracted the prevalence of legal problems, characteristics of the sampled population, and which concepts were included. 58 studies reported a total of 82 different measurements of legal problems. 56.8% of measures reflected a single concept (e.g., incarcerated only). The rest of the measures reflected two or more concepts within a single reported measure (e.g., incarcerations and arrests). Among all measures, the concept of incarceration or being imprisoned appeared the most frequently (57%). The mean of the reported legal problems was 26%. The literature indicates that legal concepts, however operationalized, are very common among patients. The variation in measurement definitions and approaches indicates the potential difficulties for organizations seeking to address these challenges.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00246-5Social determinants of healthScreeningMeasurement
spellingShingle Joshua R. Vest
Rachel J. Hinrichs
Heidi Hosler
How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
Health & Justice
Social determinants of health
Screening
Measurement
title How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_full How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_fullStr How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_short How legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings: a systematic review
title_sort how legal problems are conceptualized and measured in healthcare settings a systematic review
topic Social determinants of health
Screening
Measurement
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-023-00246-5
work_keys_str_mv AT joshuarvest howlegalproblemsareconceptualizedandmeasuredinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT racheljhinrichs howlegalproblemsareconceptualizedandmeasuredinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview
AT heidihosler howlegalproblemsareconceptualizedandmeasuredinhealthcaresettingsasystematicreview