The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

**Background:** Persistence and adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) affects treatment efficacy and economic outcomes, both of which contribute to overall patient disease burden. Current literature suggests that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who adhere to DMT for 12 months have fe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Pardo, Elmor D. Pineda, Carmen D. Ng, Daniel Sheinson, Nicole G. Bonine
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2022-04-01
Series:Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2022.33288
_version_ 1818478691844358144
author Gabriel Pardo
Elmor D. Pineda
Carmen D. Ng
Daniel Sheinson
Nicole G. Bonine
author_facet Gabriel Pardo
Elmor D. Pineda
Carmen D. Ng
Daniel Sheinson
Nicole G. Bonine
author_sort Gabriel Pardo
collection DOAJ
description **Background:** Persistence and adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) affects treatment efficacy and economic outcomes, both of which contribute to overall patient disease burden. Current literature suggests that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who adhere to DMT for 12 months have fewer relapses and reduced MS-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and medical costs than nonadherent patients. **Objective:** To expand on previous research by estimating the association of persistence and adherence with all-cause and MS-related HCRU and non-DMT costs of patients with MS across 12 and 24 months of therapy use. **Methods:** This study was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with MS in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases using claims data between April 2016 and December 2019. The index date was defined as the initiation of the DMT. Patients were required to have ≥12 months’ continuous enrollment pre-index and ≥12 or ≥24 months’ continuous enrollment post-index. Persistence was defined as no gap in DMT supply for ≥60 days within the post-index period or switch to another DMT. Adherence was calculated using the proportion of days covered (for this study, number of days covered by the DMT was 365 or 730 days), with ≥80% proportion of days covered considered adherent. Multivariable analyses were conducted to estimate total and individual components of non-DMT costs by persistence and adherence while controlling for baseline differences. **Results:** Patients who were persistent with medication for 12 months showed a reduction in mean total non-DMT medical costs of $10 022 compared with nonpersistent patients; these savings nearly doubled ($19 230) after 24 months of persistence. A similar pattern was observed for adherent vs nonadherent patients (reduction in costs at 12 months, $8543; at 24 months, $16 091). The largest reduction in all-cause HCRU costs was observed in the inpatient setting, while the largest reduction in MS-related costs was observed in the outpatient setting. **Discussion:** Patients with MS who were persistent and adherent to medication had substantially lower all-cause and MS-related non-DMT medical costs compared with those who were nonpersistent or nonadherent. **Conclusions:** These findings further support the importance of persistence and adherence to DMTs in patients with MS.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:50:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e94ac24b85394bb2b4269d25f9c67dac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2327-2236
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:50:54Z
publishDate 2022-04-01
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format Article
series Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
spelling doaj.art-e94ac24b85394bb2b4269d25f9c67dac2022-12-22T01:53:40ZengColumbia Data Analytics, LLCJournal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research2327-22362022-04-01The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple SclerosisGabriel PardoElmor D. PinedaCarmen D. NgDaniel SheinsonNicole G. Bonine**Background:** Persistence and adherence to disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) affects treatment efficacy and economic outcomes, both of which contribute to overall patient disease burden. Current literature suggests that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) who adhere to DMT for 12 months have fewer relapses and reduced MS-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and medical costs than nonadherent patients. **Objective:** To expand on previous research by estimating the association of persistence and adherence with all-cause and MS-related HCRU and non-DMT costs of patients with MS across 12 and 24 months of therapy use. **Methods:** This study was a retrospective analysis of adult patients with MS in the IBM MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases using claims data between April 2016 and December 2019. The index date was defined as the initiation of the DMT. Patients were required to have ≥12 months’ continuous enrollment pre-index and ≥12 or ≥24 months’ continuous enrollment post-index. Persistence was defined as no gap in DMT supply for ≥60 days within the post-index period or switch to another DMT. Adherence was calculated using the proportion of days covered (for this study, number of days covered by the DMT was 365 or 730 days), with ≥80% proportion of days covered considered adherent. Multivariable analyses were conducted to estimate total and individual components of non-DMT costs by persistence and adherence while controlling for baseline differences. **Results:** Patients who were persistent with medication for 12 months showed a reduction in mean total non-DMT medical costs of $10 022 compared with nonpersistent patients; these savings nearly doubled ($19 230) after 24 months of persistence. A similar pattern was observed for adherent vs nonadherent patients (reduction in costs at 12 months, $8543; at 24 months, $16 091). The largest reduction in all-cause HCRU costs was observed in the inpatient setting, while the largest reduction in MS-related costs was observed in the outpatient setting. **Discussion:** Patients with MS who were persistent and adherent to medication had substantially lower all-cause and MS-related non-DMT medical costs compared with those who were nonpersistent or nonadherent. **Conclusions:** These findings further support the importance of persistence and adherence to DMTs in patients with MS.https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2022.33288
spellingShingle Gabriel Pardo
Elmor D. Pineda
Carmen D. Ng
Daniel Sheinson
Nicole G. Bonine
The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
Journal of Health Economics and Outcomes Research
title The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
title_full The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
title_fullStr The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
title_short The Association Between Persistence and Adherence to Disease-Modifying Therapies and Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis
title_sort association between persistence and adherence to disease modifying therapies and healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with multiple sclerosis
url https://doi.org/10.36469/jheor.2022.33288
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielpardo theassociationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT elmordpineda theassociationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT carmendng theassociationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT danielsheinson theassociationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT nicolegbonine theassociationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT gabrielpardo associationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT elmordpineda associationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT carmendng associationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT danielsheinson associationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis
AT nicolegbonine associationbetweenpersistenceandadherencetodiseasemodifyingtherapiesandhealthcareresourceutilizationandcostsinpatientswithmultiplesclerosis