Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells

Abstract Recent studies revealed classes of recurrent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neural stem/progenitor cells, including transcription-associated, promoter-proximal breaks and recurrent DSB clusters in late-replicating, long neural genes that may give rise to somatic brain mosaicism. The mec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Supawat Thongthip, Annika Carlson, Magdalena P. Crossley, Bjoern Schwer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17452-0
_version_ 1811315132153724928
author Supawat Thongthip
Annika Carlson
Magdalena P. Crossley
Bjoern Schwer
author_facet Supawat Thongthip
Annika Carlson
Magdalena P. Crossley
Bjoern Schwer
author_sort Supawat Thongthip
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recent studies revealed classes of recurrent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neural stem/progenitor cells, including transcription-associated, promoter-proximal breaks and recurrent DSB clusters in late-replicating, long neural genes that may give rise to somatic brain mosaicism. The mechanistic factors promoting these different classes of DSBs in neural stem/progenitor cells are not understood. Here, we elucidated the genome-wide landscape of RNA:DNA hybrid structures called “R-loops” in primary neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing aphidicolin-induced, mild replication stress to assess the potential contribution of R-loops to the different, recurrent classes of DNA break “hotspots”. We find that R-loops in neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing mild replication stress are present primarily in early-replicating, transcribed regions and in genes with promoter GC skew that are associated with cell lineage-specific processes. Surprisingly, most long, neural genes that form recurrent DSB clusters do not show R-loop formation under conditions of mild replication stress. Our findings are consistent with a role of R-loop-associated processes in promoter-proximal DNA break formation in highly transcribed, early replicating regions but suggest that R-loops do not drive replication stress-induced, recurrent DSB cluster formation in most long, neural genes.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T11:24:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e95152eb596743f982dfc46e00a7d276
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T11:24:49Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-e95152eb596743f982dfc46e00a7d2762022-12-22T02:48:44ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-08-0112111210.1038/s41598-022-17452-0Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cellsSupawat Thongthip0Annika Carlson1Magdalena P. Crossley2Bjoern Schwer3The Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of CaliforniaThe Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Chemical and Systems Biology, Stanford University School of MedicineThe Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of CaliforniaAbstract Recent studies revealed classes of recurrent DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in neural stem/progenitor cells, including transcription-associated, promoter-proximal breaks and recurrent DSB clusters in late-replicating, long neural genes that may give rise to somatic brain mosaicism. The mechanistic factors promoting these different classes of DSBs in neural stem/progenitor cells are not understood. Here, we elucidated the genome-wide landscape of RNA:DNA hybrid structures called “R-loops” in primary neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing aphidicolin-induced, mild replication stress to assess the potential contribution of R-loops to the different, recurrent classes of DNA break “hotspots”. We find that R-loops in neural stem/progenitor cells undergoing mild replication stress are present primarily in early-replicating, transcribed regions and in genes with promoter GC skew that are associated with cell lineage-specific processes. Surprisingly, most long, neural genes that form recurrent DSB clusters do not show R-loop formation under conditions of mild replication stress. Our findings are consistent with a role of R-loop-associated processes in promoter-proximal DNA break formation in highly transcribed, early replicating regions but suggest that R-loops do not drive replication stress-induced, recurrent DSB cluster formation in most long, neural genes.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17452-0
spellingShingle Supawat Thongthip
Annika Carlson
Magdalena P. Crossley
Bjoern Schwer
Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
Scientific Reports
title Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
title_full Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
title_fullStr Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
title_full_unstemmed Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
title_short Relationships between genome-wide R-loop distribution and classes of recurrent DNA breaks in neural stem/progenitor cells
title_sort relationships between genome wide r loop distribution and classes of recurrent dna breaks in neural stem progenitor cells
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17452-0
work_keys_str_mv AT supawatthongthip relationshipsbetweengenomewiderloopdistributionandclassesofrecurrentdnabreaksinneuralstemprogenitorcells
AT annikacarlson relationshipsbetweengenomewiderloopdistributionandclassesofrecurrentdnabreaksinneuralstemprogenitorcells
AT magdalenapcrossley relationshipsbetweengenomewiderloopdistributionandclassesofrecurrentdnabreaksinneuralstemprogenitorcells
AT bjoernschwer relationshipsbetweengenomewiderloopdistributionandclassesofrecurrentdnabreaksinneuralstemprogenitorcells