Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition
Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and sta...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | Ecological Indicators |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22005180 |
| _version_ | 1818473900028198912 |
|---|---|
| author | Philip R. Kaufmann Robert M. Hughes Steven G. Paulsen David V. Peck Curt W. Seeliger Tom Kincaid Richard M. Mitchell |
| author_facet | Philip R. Kaufmann Robert M. Hughes Steven G. Paulsen David V. Peck Curt W. Seeliger Tom Kincaid Richard M. Mitchell |
| author_sort | Philip R. Kaufmann |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Rigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22–24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:28:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e96dc865686b43f18ae4ac1c9f885bab |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1470-160X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-14T04:28:58Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecological Indicators |
| spelling | doaj.art-e96dc865686b43f18ae4ac1c9f885bab2022-12-22T02:12:10ZengElsevierEcological Indicators1470-160X2022-08-01141109047Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat conditionPhilip R. Kaufmann0Robert M. Hughes1Steven G. Paulsen2David V. Peck3Curt W. Seeliger4Tom Kincaid5Richard M. Mitchell6U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA; Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; Corresponding author at: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA.Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, & Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA; Amnis Opes Institute, 2895 Southeast Glenn Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USAGDIT, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Center for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, Pacific Ecological Systems Division, 200 SW 35th Street, Corvallis, OR 97333, USAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USARigorous assessments of the ecological condition of water resources and the effect of human activities on those waters require quantitative physical, chemical, and biological data. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s river and stream surveys quantify river and stream bed particle size and stability, instream habitat complexity and cover, riparian vegetation cover and structure, and anthropogenic disturbance activities. Physical habitat is strongly controlled by natural geoclimatic factors that co-vary with human activities. We expressed the anthropogenic alteration of physical habitat as O/E ratios of observed habitat metric values divided by values expected under least-disturbed reference conditions, where site-specific expected values vary given their geoclimatic and geomorphic context. We set criteria for good, fair, and poor condition based on the distribution of O/E values in regional least-disturbed reference sites. Poor conditions existed in 22–24% of the 1.2 million km of streams and rivers in the conterminous U.S. for riparian human disturbance, streambed sediment and riparian vegetation cover, versus 14% for instream habitat complexity. Based on the same four indicators, the percentage of stream length in poor condition within 9 separate U.S. ecoregions ranged from 4% to 42%. Associations of our physical habitat indices with anthropogenic pressures demonstrate the scope of anthropogenic habitat alteration; habitat condition was negatively related to the level of anthropogenic disturbance nationally and in nearly all ecoregions. Relative risk estimates showed that streams and rivers with poor sediment, riparian cover complexity, or instream habitat cover conditions were 1.4 to 2.6 times as likely to also have fish or macroinvertebrate assemblages in poor condition. Our physical habitat condition indicators help explain deviations in biological conditions from those observed among least-disturbed sites and inform management actions for rehabilitating impaired waters and mitigating further ecological degradation.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22005180Stream habitat complexityStreambed stabilityInstream fine sedimentsRiparian disturbanceRiparian vegetationRelative risk |
| spellingShingle | Philip R. Kaufmann Robert M. Hughes Steven G. Paulsen David V. Peck Curt W. Seeliger Tom Kincaid Richard M. Mitchell Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition Ecological Indicators Stream habitat complexity Streambed stability Instream fine sediments Riparian disturbance Riparian vegetation Relative risk |
| title | Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| title_full | Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| title_fullStr | Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| title_full_unstemmed | Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| title_short | Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| title_sort | physical habitat in conterminous us streams and rivers part 2 a quantitative assessment of habitat condition |
| topic | Stream habitat complexity Streambed stability Instream fine sediments Riparian disturbance Riparian vegetation Relative risk |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X22005180 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT philiprkaufmann physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT robertmhughes physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT stevengpaulsen physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT davidvpeck physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT curtwseeliger physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT tomkincaid physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition AT richardmmitchell physicalhabitatinconterminoususstreamsandriverspart2aquantitativeassessmentofhabitatcondition |