The Politics of Australian Responses to the Belt and Road Initiative
This article traces Australia’s evolving position on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) from 2016 to 2020, and its interrelated justifications for rejecting the BRI. The authors demonstrate that debate over the BRI disrupted a long-standing consensus about the centrality of free trade and investment...
Main Authors: | Baogang HE, Geoffrey STOKES, David HUNDT |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Scientific Publishing
2024-03-01
|
Series: | East Asian Policy |
Online Access: | https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S1793930524000072 |
Similar Items
-
The Belt and Road Initiative, political involvement, and China's OFDI
by: Haoyuan Ding, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Belt and Road Initiative as a Tool for the International Socialization of Political Elites
by: A. S. Zaseeva, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
The political economy of a rising China in Southeast Asia : Malaysia’s response to the belt and road initiative
by: Liu, Hong, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Belt & Road Initiative - China’s Belt and Road Forum: What Now?
by: Xue, Gong
Published: (2017) -
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI):
by: Virginia Soledad Busilli
Published: (2020-06-01)