A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Consumers of research (researchers, administrators, educators and clinicians) frequently use standard critical appraisal tools to evaluate the quality of published research reports. However, there is no consensus regarding the most a...
Main Authors: | Kumar VS Saravana, Massy-Westropp Nicola, Bialocerkowski Andrea E, Katrak Persis, Grimmer Karen A |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2004-09-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Online Access: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/4/22 |
Similar Items
-
Teaching physiotherapy skills in culturally-diverse classes
by: Grimmer-Somers Karen, et al.
Published: (2011-06-01) -
Some Notes on Critical Appraisal of Prevalence Studies; Comment on: “The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews Addressing Questions of Prevalence”
by: Thomas Harder
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Primary care assessment instruments for patients at risk of, or with, persistent pain: opportunistic findings from a systematic literature review
by: Karen Grimmer-Somers, et al.
Published: (2009-06-01) -
Postsurgical lower limb lymphocele managed with microsurgical lymphovenous anastomosis: a case report
by: Collette Massy-Westropp, et al.
Published: (2023-09-01) -
Adopting AMSTAR 2 critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews: speed of the tool uptake and barriers for its adoption
by: Ruzica Bojcic, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)