36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal stud...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-10-01
|
| Series: | Dentistry Journal |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/11/126 |
| _version_ | 1797510688604684288 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev |
| author_facet | Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev |
| author_sort | Maria Sarapultseva |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal study was to compare the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the ceram.x<sup>®</sup> SphereTECTM nanoceramic composite (Dentsply) or a full coverage technique with transparent strip crowns (Frasaco GmbH) with the same composite in children with or without biological caries risk factors. Methods: 80 patients (females 42/52.5%) were included in the study. A total of 160 restorations were performed. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, according to modified Ryge criteria. Conclusion: Restorations with both techniques were clinically highly successful and showed similar clinical performance at postoperatively regardless of the presence of biological factors of caries risk. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:34:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2304-6767 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T05:34:54Z |
| publishDate | 2021-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Dentistry Journal |
| spelling | doaj.art-e975df7ea60348e291bea576560e190e2023-11-22T22:59:49ZengMDPI AGDentistry Journal2304-67672021-10-0191112610.3390/dj911012636 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled TrialMaria Sarapultseva0Alexey Sarapultsev1Medical Firm Vital EBB, 136 Sheinkmana Str., 620144 Ekaterinburg, RussiaInstitute of Immunology and Physiology (IIP), Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, 106 Pervomayskaya Str., 620049 Ekaterinburg, RussiaBackground: Depending on the stage of the disease and the child’s age, different types of interventions can be used to treat early childhood caries. As a result, there is not enough clinical evidence to show that one kind of restoration is better than another. The objective of this longitudinal study was to compare the results of 36 months of clinical performance of primary incisors restorations using an incremental layering technique with the ceram.x<sup>®</sup> SphereTECTM nanoceramic composite (Dentsply) or a full coverage technique with transparent strip crowns (Frasaco GmbH) with the same composite in children with or without biological caries risk factors. Methods: 80 patients (females 42/52.5%) were included in the study. A total of 160 restorations were performed. Restorations were evaluated at baseline and at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months, according to modified Ryge criteria. Conclusion: Restorations with both techniques were clinically highly successful and showed similar clinical performance at postoperatively regardless of the presence of biological factors of caries risk.https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/11/126caries riskcomposite layering techniqueearly childhood cariespediatric dentistry restorationsprimary teeth cariesstrip crowns |
| spellingShingle | Maria Sarapultseva Alexey Sarapultsev 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial Dentistry Journal caries risk composite layering technique early childhood caries pediatric dentistry restorations primary teeth caries strip crowns |
| title | 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_full | 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_fullStr | 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_short | 36 Months’ Clinical Performance of Primary Incisors Restorations Depending on the Type of Restorative Technique Used: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
| title_sort | 36 months clinical performance of primary incisors restorations depending on the type of restorative technique used a randomized controlled trial |
| topic | caries risk composite layering technique early childhood caries pediatric dentistry restorations primary teeth caries strip crowns |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6767/9/11/126 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariasarapultseva 36monthsclinicalperformanceofprimaryincisorsrestorationsdependingonthetypeofrestorativetechniqueusedarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT alexeysarapultsev 36monthsclinicalperformanceofprimaryincisorsrestorationsdependingonthetypeofrestorativetechniqueusedarandomizedcontrolledtrial |