Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years

Background: Kidney transplant is the best treatment option for end stage kidney disease. Deceased donor transplantation has helped in increasing the donor pool for waitlisted dialysis patients. We received seventy deceased donor kidneys through the Kerala Network of Organ Sharing (KNOS) over the pas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vilesh Valsalan Kalthoonical, Georgy K Nainan, George P Abraham, Mohan Mathew, Datson George, Renu Paul, Y S Sooraj, Philip G Thomas, Vijay Radhakrishnan, Francis C Manavalan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Transplantation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2019;volume=13;issue=3;spage=188;epage=193;aulast=Kalthoonical
_version_ 1819035050065264640
author Vilesh Valsalan Kalthoonical
Georgy K Nainan
George P Abraham
Mohan Mathew
Datson George
Renu Paul
Y S Sooraj
Philip G Thomas
Vijay Radhakrishnan
Francis C Manavalan
author_facet Vilesh Valsalan Kalthoonical
Georgy K Nainan
George P Abraham
Mohan Mathew
Datson George
Renu Paul
Y S Sooraj
Philip G Thomas
Vijay Radhakrishnan
Francis C Manavalan
author_sort Vilesh Valsalan Kalthoonical
collection DOAJ
description Background: Kidney transplant is the best treatment option for end stage kidney disease. Deceased donor transplantation has helped in increasing the donor pool for waitlisted dialysis patients. We received seventy deceased donor kidneys through the Kerala Network of Organ Sharing (KNOS) over the past 4 years from August 2013 to August 2017 and transplanted sixty six with good outcome. Pre-implantation biopsy performed in marginal donors helped in decision making to take the kidney and increase the donor pool. Aims and Objectives: 1)To evaluate outcome of renal transplant recipients in deceased donor transplantation. 2)To evaluate the role of pre-implantation biopsy to improve donor selection for better long term outcome. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six deceased donor kidneys were transplanted into the recipients from our pool of 253 patients registered with the KNOS. Four cadaver kidneys were rejected based on pre-implantation biopsy. Fifty-nine transplants were done at VPS Lakeshore and seven were done at PVS Memorial Hospital, Kochi. Donors of age less than 65 years were considered. Pre-tranpslant evaluation of recipients on waiting list including lab and cardiac evaluation with PRA status was done. Cross match was done prior to transplant. Triple immunosuppression including cyclosporine, mychophenolate mofetil and prednisolone with basiliximab as induction agent was used in all cases. Low dose tacrolimus was introduced after the third month in some cases. Pre-implantation biopsy was done in marginal donors for better donor selection. Results: Of the 66 recipients, 52 (78.8%) were males and 14 (21.2%) were females. PRA status was negative in all recipients. Deceased donors <65 years of age were considered. Twenty deceased donor kidneys were biopsied before implantation, of which 16 were implanted. Four kidneys were rejected as one showed glomerulocystic changes . One had extensive thrombus in all glomeruli, one had >56% IFTA changes, and other had 30%–40% IFTA changes. Results at 4 years post-transplant showed graft survival in 55/66 (83.34%) and patient survival in 60/66 (90.91%) cases. Six patients died: two with pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (at 9 months/3.3 years post-transplant), one with mucormycosis (at 16 months post-transplant), one with acute coronary syndrome (immediate post-transplant), and two patients with sepsis. The average serum creatinine was < 1.4 mg/dl in 48 (87.2%) cases, 1.4–2.4 mg/dl in 7 (12.7%) cases, and > 2.4 mg/dl in 1 (1.8%) case. The surgical outcome was good in all (100%) patients with no intraoperative surgical complications. Delayed graft function was noted in 18% of patients. Prolonged cold ischemia time was noted in patients with acute tubular necrosis. Six patients had acute rejection, of which two were antibody mediated, and four had acute cellular rejection. One patient had tacrolimus toxicity on biopsy and was shifted to everolimus. Infections included one patient with surgical wound infection, 12 patients with urinary tract infections, one patient with invasive fungal infection, and two patients with PCP. At 4 years, deceased donor transplantation has good graft and patient outcomes. Conclusion: Deceased donor transplantation has good graft outcome which is comparable to live non related donors. It has minimal paper work and less costly than routine live transplant. Pre-implantation biopsy should be considered in marginal donors for appropriate donor selection and avoid organ wastage in doubtful cases. In our study we noted that transplant outcome was better in recipients receiving kidney from with in the city limits because of less cold ischemia time. Hence facilities for early transportation of organs with minimal procedural hurdles to minimize cold ischemia time should be carried out by the concerned authorities. Proactivity from the Government at state, zonal and national level is needed to improve deceased donor pool and cadaver transplantation in India.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T07:43:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e97900b341004d5e94d4aa2a42c9720c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2212-0017
2212-0025
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T07:43:27Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Transplantation
spelling doaj.art-e97900b341004d5e94d4aa2a42c9720c2022-12-21T19:11:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Transplantation2212-00172212-00252019-01-0113318819310.4103/ijot.ijot_80_18Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 yearsVilesh Valsalan KalthoonicalGeorgy K NainanGeorge P AbrahamMohan MathewDatson GeorgeRenu PaulY S SoorajPhilip G ThomasVijay RadhakrishnanFrancis C ManavalanBackground: Kidney transplant is the best treatment option for end stage kidney disease. Deceased donor transplantation has helped in increasing the donor pool for waitlisted dialysis patients. We received seventy deceased donor kidneys through the Kerala Network of Organ Sharing (KNOS) over the past 4 years from August 2013 to August 2017 and transplanted sixty six with good outcome. Pre-implantation biopsy performed in marginal donors helped in decision making to take the kidney and increase the donor pool. Aims and Objectives: 1)To evaluate outcome of renal transplant recipients in deceased donor transplantation. 2)To evaluate the role of pre-implantation biopsy to improve donor selection for better long term outcome. Materials and Methods: Sixty-six deceased donor kidneys were transplanted into the recipients from our pool of 253 patients registered with the KNOS. Four cadaver kidneys were rejected based on pre-implantation biopsy. Fifty-nine transplants were done at VPS Lakeshore and seven were done at PVS Memorial Hospital, Kochi. Donors of age less than 65 years were considered. Pre-tranpslant evaluation of recipients on waiting list including lab and cardiac evaluation with PRA status was done. Cross match was done prior to transplant. Triple immunosuppression including cyclosporine, mychophenolate mofetil and prednisolone with basiliximab as induction agent was used in all cases. Low dose tacrolimus was introduced after the third month in some cases. Pre-implantation biopsy was done in marginal donors for better donor selection. Results: Of the 66 recipients, 52 (78.8%) were males and 14 (21.2%) were females. PRA status was negative in all recipients. Deceased donors <65 years of age were considered. Twenty deceased donor kidneys were biopsied before implantation, of which 16 were implanted. Four kidneys were rejected as one showed glomerulocystic changes . One had extensive thrombus in all glomeruli, one had >56% IFTA changes, and other had 30%–40% IFTA changes. Results at 4 years post-transplant showed graft survival in 55/66 (83.34%) and patient survival in 60/66 (90.91%) cases. Six patients died: two with pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) (at 9 months/3.3 years post-transplant), one with mucormycosis (at 16 months post-transplant), one with acute coronary syndrome (immediate post-transplant), and two patients with sepsis. The average serum creatinine was < 1.4 mg/dl in 48 (87.2%) cases, 1.4–2.4 mg/dl in 7 (12.7%) cases, and > 2.4 mg/dl in 1 (1.8%) case. The surgical outcome was good in all (100%) patients with no intraoperative surgical complications. Delayed graft function was noted in 18% of patients. Prolonged cold ischemia time was noted in patients with acute tubular necrosis. Six patients had acute rejection, of which two were antibody mediated, and four had acute cellular rejection. One patient had tacrolimus toxicity on biopsy and was shifted to everolimus. Infections included one patient with surgical wound infection, 12 patients with urinary tract infections, one patient with invasive fungal infection, and two patients with PCP. At 4 years, deceased donor transplantation has good graft and patient outcomes. Conclusion: Deceased donor transplantation has good graft outcome which is comparable to live non related donors. It has minimal paper work and less costly than routine live transplant. Pre-implantation biopsy should be considered in marginal donors for appropriate donor selection and avoid organ wastage in doubtful cases. In our study we noted that transplant outcome was better in recipients receiving kidney from with in the city limits because of less cold ischemia time. Hence facilities for early transportation of organs with minimal procedural hurdles to minimize cold ischemia time should be carried out by the concerned authorities. Proactivity from the Government at state, zonal and national level is needed to improve deceased donor pool and cadaver transplantation in India.http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2019;volume=13;issue=3;spage=188;epage=193;aulast=KalthoonicalDeceased donorgraft survivalpatient survivalpreimplantation biopsyrejection
spellingShingle Vilesh Valsalan Kalthoonical
Georgy K Nainan
George P Abraham
Mohan Mathew
Datson George
Renu Paul
Y S Sooraj
Philip G Thomas
Vijay Radhakrishnan
Francis C Manavalan
Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
Indian Journal of Transplantation
Deceased donor
graft survival
patient survival
preimplantation biopsy
rejection
title Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
title_full Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
title_fullStr Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
title_full_unstemmed Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
title_short Deceased donor transplantation – Our experience in the last 4 years
title_sort deceased donor transplantation our experience in the last 4 years
topic Deceased donor
graft survival
patient survival
preimplantation biopsy
rejection
url http://www.ijtonline.in/article.asp?issn=2212-0017;year=2019;volume=13;issue=3;spage=188;epage=193;aulast=Kalthoonical
work_keys_str_mv AT vileshvalsalankalthoonical deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT georgyknainan deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT georgepabraham deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT mohanmathew deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT datsongeorge deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT renupaul deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT yssooraj deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT philipgthomas deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT vijayradhakrishnan deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years
AT franciscmanavalan deceaseddonortransplantationourexperienceinthelast4years