Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BackgroundPlaque erosion causes 30% of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarctions, but the underlying cause is unknown. Inflammatory infiltrates are less abundant in erosion compared with rupture in autopsy studies. We hypothesized that erosion and rupture are associated with significant difference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sujay Chandran, Johnathan Watkins, Amina Abdul‐Aziz, Manar Shafat, Patrick A. Calvert, Kristian M. Bowles, Marcus D. Flather, Stuart A. Rushworth, Alisdair D. Ryding
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017-05-01
Series:Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.005868
_version_ 1828309904077619200
author Sujay Chandran
Johnathan Watkins
Amina Abdul‐Aziz
Manar Shafat
Patrick A. Calvert
Kristian M. Bowles
Marcus D. Flather
Stuart A. Rushworth
Alisdair D. Ryding
author_facet Sujay Chandran
Johnathan Watkins
Amina Abdul‐Aziz
Manar Shafat
Patrick A. Calvert
Kristian M. Bowles
Marcus D. Flather
Stuart A. Rushworth
Alisdair D. Ryding
author_sort Sujay Chandran
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundPlaque erosion causes 30% of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarctions, but the underlying cause is unknown. Inflammatory infiltrates are less abundant in erosion compared with rupture in autopsy studies. We hypothesized that erosion and rupture are associated with significant differences in intracoronary cytokines in vivo. Methods and ResultsForty ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with <6 hours of chest pain were classified as ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) using optical coherence tomography. Plasma samples from the infarct‐related artery and a peripheral artery were analyzed for expression of 102 cytokines using arrays; results were confirmed with ELISA. Thrombectomy samples were analyzed for differential mRNA expression using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Twenty‐three lesions were classified as RFC (58%), 15 as IFC (38%), and 2 were undefined (4%). In addition, 12% (12 of 102) of cytokines were differentially expressed in both coronary and peripheral plasma. I‐TAC was preferentially expressed in RFC (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P<0.001; ELISA IFC 10.2 versus RFC 10.8 log2 pg/mL; P=0.042). IFC was associated with preferential expression of epidermal growth factor (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P<0.001; ELISA IFC 7.42 versus RFC 6.63 log2 pg/mL, P=0.036) and thrombospondin 1 (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P=0.03; ELISA IFC 10.4 versus RFC 8.65 log2 ng/mL, P=0.0041). Thrombectomy mRNA showed elevated I‐TAC in RFC (P=0.0007) epidermal growth factor expression in IFC (P=0.0264) but no differences in expression of thrombospondin 1. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate differential intracoronary cytokine expression in RFC and IFC. Elevated thrombospondin 1 and epidermal growth factor may play an etiological role in erosion.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T15:36:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e97e82911e704c39b49de12d5bfe7273
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-9980
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T15:36:01Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
spelling doaj.art-e97e82911e704c39b49de12d5bfe72732022-12-22T02:41:16ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802017-05-016510.1161/JAHA.117.005868Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSujay Chandran0Johnathan Watkins1Amina Abdul‐Aziz2Manar Shafat3Patrick A. Calvert4Kristian M. Bowles5Marcus D. Flather6Stuart A. Rushworth7Alisdair D. Ryding8Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United KingdomPILAR Research and Education, Cambridge, United KingdomNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United KingdomNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United KingdomPapworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Papworth Everard Cambridge, United KingdomNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United KingdomNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United KingdomNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United KingdomNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital, Norwich, United KingdomBackgroundPlaque erosion causes 30% of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarctions, but the underlying cause is unknown. Inflammatory infiltrates are less abundant in erosion compared with rupture in autopsy studies. We hypothesized that erosion and rupture are associated with significant differences in intracoronary cytokines in vivo. Methods and ResultsForty ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with <6 hours of chest pain were classified as ruptured fibrous cap (RFC) or intact fibrous cap (IFC) using optical coherence tomography. Plasma samples from the infarct‐related artery and a peripheral artery were analyzed for expression of 102 cytokines using arrays; results were confirmed with ELISA. Thrombectomy samples were analyzed for differential mRNA expression using quantitative real‐time polymerase chain reaction. Twenty‐three lesions were classified as RFC (58%), 15 as IFC (38%), and 2 were undefined (4%). In addition, 12% (12 of 102) of cytokines were differentially expressed in both coronary and peripheral plasma. I‐TAC was preferentially expressed in RFC (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P<0.001; ELISA IFC 10.2 versus RFC 10.8 log2 pg/mL; P=0.042). IFC was associated with preferential expression of epidermal growth factor (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P<0.001; ELISA IFC 7.42 versus RFC 6.63 log2 pg/mL, P=0.036) and thrombospondin 1 (significance analysis of microarrays adjusted P=0.03; ELISA IFC 10.4 versus RFC 8.65 log2 ng/mL, P=0.0041). Thrombectomy mRNA showed elevated I‐TAC in RFC (P=0.0007) epidermal growth factor expression in IFC (P=0.0264) but no differences in expression of thrombospondin 1. ConclusionsThese results demonstrate differential intracoronary cytokine expression in RFC and IFC. Elevated thrombospondin 1 and epidermal growth factor may play an etiological role in erosion.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.005868coronary artery diseaseerosioninflammationmyocardial infarctionoptical coherence tomographythrombospondin 1
spellingShingle Sujay Chandran
Johnathan Watkins
Amina Abdul‐Aziz
Manar Shafat
Patrick A. Calvert
Kristian M. Bowles
Marcus D. Flather
Stuart A. Rushworth
Alisdair D. Ryding
Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
coronary artery disease
erosion
inflammation
myocardial infarction
optical coherence tomography
thrombospondin 1
title Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_fullStr Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_full_unstemmed Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_short Inflammatory Differences in Plaque Erosion and Rupture in Patients With ST‐Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
title_sort inflammatory differences in plaque erosion and rupture in patients with st segment elevation myocardial infarction
topic coronary artery disease
erosion
inflammation
myocardial infarction
optical coherence tomography
thrombospondin 1
url https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.117.005868
work_keys_str_mv AT sujaychandran inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT johnathanwatkins inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT aminaabdulaziz inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT manarshafat inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT patrickacalvert inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT kristianmbowles inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT marcusdflather inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT stuartarushworth inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction
AT alisdairdryding inflammatorydifferencesinplaqueerosionandruptureinpatientswithstsegmentelevationmyocardialinfarction