A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas

Abstract Urbanization can be a challenge and an opportunity for earthquake risk mitigation. However, little is known about the changes in exposure (for example, population and urban land) to earthquakes in the context of global urbanization, and their impacts on fatalities in earthquake-prone areas....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chunyang He, Qingxu Huang, Xuemei Bai, Derek T. Robinson, Peijun Shi, Yinyin Dou, Bo Zhao, Jubo Yan, Qiang Zhang, Fangjin Xu, James Daniell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-12-01
Series:International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00385-z
_version_ 1819097905223434240
author Chunyang He
Qingxu Huang
Xuemei Bai
Derek T. Robinson
Peijun Shi
Yinyin Dou
Bo Zhao
Jubo Yan
Qiang Zhang
Fangjin Xu
James Daniell
author_facet Chunyang He
Qingxu Huang
Xuemei Bai
Derek T. Robinson
Peijun Shi
Yinyin Dou
Bo Zhao
Jubo Yan
Qiang Zhang
Fangjin Xu
James Daniell
author_sort Chunyang He
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Urbanization can be a challenge and an opportunity for earthquake risk mitigation. However, little is known about the changes in exposure (for example, population and urban land) to earthquakes in the context of global urbanization, and their impacts on fatalities in earthquake-prone areas. We present a global analysis of the changes in population size and urban land area in earthquake-prone areas from 1990 to 2015, and their impacts on earthquake-related fatalities. We found that more than two thirds of population growth (or 70% of total population in 2015) and nearly three quarters of earthquake-related deaths (or 307,918 deaths) in global earthquake-prone areas occurred in developing countries with an urbanization ratio (percentage of urban population to total population) between 20 and 60%. Holding other factors constant, population size was significantly and positively associated with earthquake fatalities, while the area of urban land was negatively related. The results suggest that fatalities increase for areas where the urbanization ratio is low, but after a ratio between 40 and 50% occurs, earthquake fatalities decline. This finding suggests that the resistance of building and infrastructure is greater in countries with higher urbanization ratios and highlights the need for further investigation. Our quantitative analysis is extended into the future using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways to reveal that by 2050, more than 50% of the population increase in global earthquake-prone areas will take place in a few developing countries (Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh) that are particularly vulnerable to earthquakes. To reduce earthquake-induced fatalities, enhanced resilience of buildings and urban infrastructure generally in these few countries should be a priority.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:22:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e98f627b731348e58edd8aa208ebbb40
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2095-0055
2192-6395
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:22:31Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
spelling doaj.art-e98f627b731348e58edd8aa208ebbb402022-12-21T18:45:08ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Science2095-00552192-63952021-12-0112680582010.1007/s13753-021-00385-zA Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone AreasChunyang He0Qingxu Huang1Xuemei Bai2Derek T. Robinson3Peijun Shi4Yinyin Dou5Bo Zhao6Jubo Yan7Qiang Zhang8Fangjin Xu9James Daniell10State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal UniversityState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal UniversityFenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National UniversityDepartment of Geography and Environmental Management, University of WaterlooState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal UniversityKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of SciencesDepartment of Geography, University of WashingtonSchool of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological UniversityState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal UniversityState Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Beijing Normal UniversityGeophysical Institute and Center for Disaster Management and Risk Reduction Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)Abstract Urbanization can be a challenge and an opportunity for earthquake risk mitigation. However, little is known about the changes in exposure (for example, population and urban land) to earthquakes in the context of global urbanization, and their impacts on fatalities in earthquake-prone areas. We present a global analysis of the changes in population size and urban land area in earthquake-prone areas from 1990 to 2015, and their impacts on earthquake-related fatalities. We found that more than two thirds of population growth (or 70% of total population in 2015) and nearly three quarters of earthquake-related deaths (or 307,918 deaths) in global earthquake-prone areas occurred in developing countries with an urbanization ratio (percentage of urban population to total population) between 20 and 60%. Holding other factors constant, population size was significantly and positively associated with earthquake fatalities, while the area of urban land was negatively related. The results suggest that fatalities increase for areas where the urbanization ratio is low, but after a ratio between 40 and 50% occurs, earthquake fatalities decline. This finding suggests that the resistance of building and infrastructure is greater in countries with higher urbanization ratios and highlights the need for further investigation. Our quantitative analysis is extended into the future using Shared Socioeconomic Pathways to reveal that by 2050, more than 50% of the population increase in global earthquake-prone areas will take place in a few developing countries (Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh) that are particularly vulnerable to earthquakes. To reduce earthquake-induced fatalities, enhanced resilience of buildings and urban infrastructure generally in these few countries should be a priority.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00385-zEarthquake riskGlobal SouthRisk governanceUrbanization ratioUrban sustainability
spellingShingle Chunyang He
Qingxu Huang
Xuemei Bai
Derek T. Robinson
Peijun Shi
Yinyin Dou
Bo Zhao
Jubo Yan
Qiang Zhang
Fangjin Xu
James Daniell
A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science
Earthquake risk
Global South
Risk governance
Urbanization ratio
Urban sustainability
title A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
title_full A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
title_fullStr A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
title_full_unstemmed A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
title_short A Global Analysis of the Relationship Between Urbanization and Fatalities in Earthquake-Prone Areas
title_sort global analysis of the relationship between urbanization and fatalities in earthquake prone areas
topic Earthquake risk
Global South
Risk governance
Urbanization ratio
Urban sustainability
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-021-00385-z
work_keys_str_mv AT chunyanghe aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT qingxuhuang aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT xuemeibai aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT derektrobinson aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT peijunshi aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT yinyindou aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT bozhao aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT juboyan aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT qiangzhang aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT fangjinxu aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT jamesdaniell aglobalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT chunyanghe globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT qingxuhuang globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT xuemeibai globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT derektrobinson globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT peijunshi globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT yinyindou globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT bozhao globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT juboyan globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT qiangzhang globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT fangjinxu globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas
AT jamesdaniell globalanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenurbanizationandfatalitiesinearthquakeproneareas