Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications

Due to its effectiveness and ease of application, the process of flocculation and coagulation is often used for pollution removal in wastewater treatment. Most of these coagulants precipitate and accumulate in waste activated sludge (WAS), and could negatively affect sludge treatments, as observed f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Pasciucco, Erika Pasciucco, Alessio Castagnoli, Renato Iannelli, Isabella Pecorini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-04-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024053131
_version_ 1797215926236479488
author Francesco Pasciucco
Erika Pasciucco
Alessio Castagnoli
Renato Iannelli
Isabella Pecorini
author_facet Francesco Pasciucco
Erika Pasciucco
Alessio Castagnoli
Renato Iannelli
Isabella Pecorini
author_sort Francesco Pasciucco
collection DOAJ
description Due to its effectiveness and ease of application, the process of flocculation and coagulation is often used for pollution removal in wastewater treatment. Most of these coagulants precipitate and accumulate in waste activated sludge (WAS), and could negatively affect sludge treatments, as observed for anaerobic digestion. Nowadays, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are widely discussed because of the current paradigm shift from linear to circular economy, and the treatments performed at the facility should be planned to avoid or reduce adverse effects on other processes. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of poly aluminum chloride (PAC) and aluminum sulfate (AS) on WAS anaerobic digestion, by feeding replicate serum reactors with different levels of coagulant (5, 10 and 20 mg Al/g TS). Reactors without the addition of any coagulants represented the control group. Results revealed that Al-based coagulants inhibited methane production, which decreased as the coagulant addition increased. The inhibition was much more severe in AS-conditioned reactors, showing average reductions in methane yield from 14.4 to 31.7%, compared to the control (167.76 ± 1.88 mL CH4/g VS). Analytical analysis, FTIR and SEM investigations revealed that the addition of coagulants affected the initial conditions of the anaerobic reactors, penalizing the solubilization, hydrolysis and acidogenesis phases. Furthermore, the massive formation of H2S in AS-conditioned reactors played a key role in the suppression of methane phase. On the other hand, the use of coagulant can promote the accumulation and recovery of nutrient in WAS, especially in terms of phosphorus. Our findings will expand research knowledge in this field and guide stakeholders in the choice of coagulants at full scale plant. Future research should focus on reducing the effect of coagulants on methane production by modifying or testing new types of flocculants.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T11:37:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e991c17c309f4dbdbd45c7902a5182dd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-8440
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T11:37:49Z
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj.art-e991c17c309f4dbdbd45c7902a5182dd2024-04-10T04:29:18ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402024-04-01107e29282Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implicationsFrancesco Pasciucco0Erika Pasciucco1Alessio Castagnoli2Renato Iannelli3Isabella Pecorini4Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, ItalyDepartment of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, ItalyCorresponding author.; Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering (DESTEC), University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, ItalyDue to its effectiveness and ease of application, the process of flocculation and coagulation is often used for pollution removal in wastewater treatment. Most of these coagulants precipitate and accumulate in waste activated sludge (WAS), and could negatively affect sludge treatments, as observed for anaerobic digestion. Nowadays, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) are widely discussed because of the current paradigm shift from linear to circular economy, and the treatments performed at the facility should be planned to avoid or reduce adverse effects on other processes. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of poly aluminum chloride (PAC) and aluminum sulfate (AS) on WAS anaerobic digestion, by feeding replicate serum reactors with different levels of coagulant (5, 10 and 20 mg Al/g TS). Reactors without the addition of any coagulants represented the control group. Results revealed that Al-based coagulants inhibited methane production, which decreased as the coagulant addition increased. The inhibition was much more severe in AS-conditioned reactors, showing average reductions in methane yield from 14.4 to 31.7%, compared to the control (167.76 ± 1.88 mL CH4/g VS). Analytical analysis, FTIR and SEM investigations revealed that the addition of coagulants affected the initial conditions of the anaerobic reactors, penalizing the solubilization, hydrolysis and acidogenesis phases. Furthermore, the massive formation of H2S in AS-conditioned reactors played a key role in the suppression of methane phase. On the other hand, the use of coagulant can promote the accumulation and recovery of nutrient in WAS, especially in terms of phosphorus. Our findings will expand research knowledge in this field and guide stakeholders in the choice of coagulants at full scale plant. Future research should focus on reducing the effect of coagulants on methane production by modifying or testing new types of flocculants.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024053131Anaerobic digestionWaste activated sludgeMethane productionPoly aluminum chlorideAluminum sulfateCoagulants
spellingShingle Francesco Pasciucco
Erika Pasciucco
Alessio Castagnoli
Renato Iannelli
Isabella Pecorini
Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
Heliyon
Anaerobic digestion
Waste activated sludge
Methane production
Poly aluminum chloride
Aluminum sulfate
Coagulants
title Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
title_full Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
title_fullStr Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
title_short Comparing the effects of Al-based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion: Methane yield, kinetics and sludge implications
title_sort comparing the effects of al based coagulants in waste activated sludge anaerobic digestion methane yield kinetics and sludge implications
topic Anaerobic digestion
Waste activated sludge
Methane production
Poly aluminum chloride
Aluminum sulfate
Coagulants
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024053131
work_keys_str_mv AT francescopasciucco comparingtheeffectsofalbasedcoagulantsinwasteactivatedsludgeanaerobicdigestionmethaneyieldkineticsandsludgeimplications
AT erikapasciucco comparingtheeffectsofalbasedcoagulantsinwasteactivatedsludgeanaerobicdigestionmethaneyieldkineticsandsludgeimplications
AT alessiocastagnoli comparingtheeffectsofalbasedcoagulantsinwasteactivatedsludgeanaerobicdigestionmethaneyieldkineticsandsludgeimplications
AT renatoiannelli comparingtheeffectsofalbasedcoagulantsinwasteactivatedsludgeanaerobicdigestionmethaneyieldkineticsandsludgeimplications
AT isabellapecorini comparingtheeffectsofalbasedcoagulantsinwasteactivatedsludgeanaerobicdigestionmethaneyieldkineticsandsludgeimplications