Reactions to threatening health messages

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Threatening health messages that focus on severity are popular, but frequently have no effect or even a counterproductive effect on behavior change. This paradox (i.e. wide application despite low effectiveness) may be partly explain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: ten Hoor Gill A, Peters Gjalt-Jorn Y, Kalagi Janice, de Groot Lianne, Grootjans Karlijne, Huschens Alexander, Köhninger Constanze, Kölgen Lizan, Pelssers Isabelle, Schütt Toby, Thomas Sophia, Ruiter Robert AC, Kok Gerjo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-11-01
Series:BMC Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1011
_version_ 1819122886923780096
author ten Hoor Gill A
Peters Gjalt-Jorn Y
Kalagi Janice
de Groot Lianne
Grootjans Karlijne
Huschens Alexander
Köhninger Constanze
Kölgen Lizan
Pelssers Isabelle
Schütt Toby
Thomas Sophia
Ruiter Robert AC
Kok Gerjo
author_facet ten Hoor Gill A
Peters Gjalt-Jorn Y
Kalagi Janice
de Groot Lianne
Grootjans Karlijne
Huschens Alexander
Köhninger Constanze
Kölgen Lizan
Pelssers Isabelle
Schütt Toby
Thomas Sophia
Ruiter Robert AC
Kok Gerjo
author_sort ten Hoor Gill A
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Threatening health messages that focus on severity are popular, but frequently have no effect or even a counterproductive effect on behavior change. This paradox (i.e. wide application despite low effectiveness) may be partly explained by the intuitive appeal of threatening communication: it may be hard to predict the defensive reactions occurring in response to fear appeals. We examine this hypothesis by using two studies by Brown and colleagues, which provide evidence that threatening health messages in the form of distressing imagery in anti-smoking and anti-alcohol campaigns cause defensive reactions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We simulated both Brown et al. experiments, asking participants to estimate the reactions of the original study subjects to the threatening health information (n = 93). Afterwards, we presented the actual original study outcomes. One week later, we assessed whether this knowledge of the actual study outcomes helped participants to more successfully estimate the effectiveness of the threatening health information (n = 72).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results showed that participants were initially convinced of the effectiveness of threatening health messages and were unable to anticipate the defensive reactions that in fact occurred. Furthermore, these estimates did not improve after participants had been explained the dynamics of threatening communication as well as what the effects of the threatening communication had been in reality.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the effectiveness of threatening health messages is intuitively appealing. What is more, providing empirical evidence against the use of threatening health messages has very little effect on this intuitive appeal.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:59:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9a52a272f944670a13bbe5fe0a11040
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:59:35Z
publishDate 2012-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Public Health
spelling doaj.art-e9a52a272f944670a13bbe5fe0a110402022-12-21T18:34:51ZengBMCBMC Public Health1471-24582012-11-01121101110.1186/1471-2458-12-1011Reactions to threatening health messagesten Hoor Gill APeters Gjalt-Jorn YKalagi Janicede Groot LianneGrootjans KarlijneHuschens AlexanderKöhninger ConstanzeKölgen LizanPelssers IsabelleSchütt TobyThomas SophiaRuiter Robert ACKok Gerjo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Threatening health messages that focus on severity are popular, but frequently have no effect or even a counterproductive effect on behavior change. This paradox (i.e. wide application despite low effectiveness) may be partly explained by the intuitive appeal of threatening communication: it may be hard to predict the defensive reactions occurring in response to fear appeals. We examine this hypothesis by using two studies by Brown and colleagues, which provide evidence that threatening health messages in the form of distressing imagery in anti-smoking and anti-alcohol campaigns cause defensive reactions.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We simulated both Brown et al. experiments, asking participants to estimate the reactions of the original study subjects to the threatening health information (n = 93). Afterwards, we presented the actual original study outcomes. One week later, we assessed whether this knowledge of the actual study outcomes helped participants to more successfully estimate the effectiveness of the threatening health information (n = 72).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Results showed that participants were initially convinced of the effectiveness of threatening health messages and were unable to anticipate the defensive reactions that in fact occurred. Furthermore, these estimates did not improve after participants had been explained the dynamics of threatening communication as well as what the effects of the threatening communication had been in reality.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that the effectiveness of threatening health messages is intuitively appealing. What is more, providing empirical evidence against the use of threatening health messages has very little effect on this intuitive appeal.</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1011Threatening health messagesDefensive reactionsSmokersDrinkers
spellingShingle ten Hoor Gill A
Peters Gjalt-Jorn Y
Kalagi Janice
de Groot Lianne
Grootjans Karlijne
Huschens Alexander
Köhninger Constanze
Kölgen Lizan
Pelssers Isabelle
Schütt Toby
Thomas Sophia
Ruiter Robert AC
Kok Gerjo
Reactions to threatening health messages
BMC Public Health
Threatening health messages
Defensive reactions
Smokers
Drinkers
title Reactions to threatening health messages
title_full Reactions to threatening health messages
title_fullStr Reactions to threatening health messages
title_full_unstemmed Reactions to threatening health messages
title_short Reactions to threatening health messages
title_sort reactions to threatening health messages
topic Threatening health messages
Defensive reactions
Smokers
Drinkers
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/12/1011
work_keys_str_mv AT tenhoorgilla reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT petersgjaltjorny reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT kalagijanice reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT degrootlianne reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT grootjanskarlijne reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT huschensalexander reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT kohningerconstanze reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT kolgenlizan reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT pelssersisabelle reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT schutttoby reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT thomassophia reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT ruiterrobertac reactionstothreateninghealthmessages
AT kokgerjo reactionstothreateninghealthmessages