Elicitation of US and Chinese expert judgments show consistent views on solar geoengineering
Abstract Expert judgments on solar geoengineering (SG) inform policy decisions and influence public opinions. We performed face-to-face interviews using formal expert elicitation methods with 13 US and 13 Chinese climate experts randomly selected from IPCC authors or supplemented by snowball samplin...
Main Authors: | Zhen Dai, Elizabeth T. Burns, Peter J. Irvine, Dustin H. Tingley, Jianhua Xu, David W. Keith |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Springer Nature
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Humanities & Social Sciences Communications |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00694-6 |
Similar Items
-
US Conservative and Libertarian Experts and Solar Geoengineering: An Assessment
by: Jean-Daniel Collomb -
Brief communication: Understanding solar geoengineering's potential to limit sea level rise requires attention from cryosphere experts
by: P. J. Irvine, et al.
Published: (2018-07-01) -
Solar geoengineering and democracy
by: Horton, JB, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review
by: Alistair Duffey, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Halving warming with idealized solar geoengineering moderates key climate hazards
by: Irvine, Peter, et al.
Published: (2020)