Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action
Panikkar’s philosophy of mysticism is best understood as an attempt to overcome monistic and dualistic ways of thinking about the divine, human beings and the universe. Mysticism, for Panikkar, is irreducible to either monistic experiences of oneness without a second or to dualistic experiences wher...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
| Series: | Religions |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/10/1331 |
| _version_ | 1797572429167460352 |
|---|---|
| author | Abraham Vélez de Cea |
| author_facet | Abraham Vélez de Cea |
| author_sort | Abraham Vélez de Cea |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Panikkar’s philosophy of mysticism is best understood as an attempt to overcome monistic and dualistic ways of thinking about the divine, human beings and the universe. Mysticism, for Panikkar, is irreducible to either monistic experiences of oneness without a second or to dualistic experiences where the divine is seen as wholly other. Rather, mysticism relates to holistic experiences of Reality and Life where the divine, the universe and human consciousness are seen as distinct yet constitutively interrelated. Mysticism has often been based on dualistic views of this life and the next, worldly existence and heavenly existence, the material and the spiritual, body and soul, and action and contemplation. These dualisms have led many to view mysticism as negating life and as an escape from this world and human activities. Panikkar’s philosophy of mysticism, however, attempts to overcome these dualisms and restores the equilibrium between the diverse yet united aspects of Reality and the human condition. This article is divided into two parts. The first part introduces Panikkar’s conception of mysticism as an anthropological dimension and as involving holistic experiences of Reality and Life. The second part examines Panikkar’s notion of pure consciousness and his understanding of mystical experiences as being the result of various mediating factors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:56:08Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-e9af212cef8e496993bfb9b72205de16 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2077-1444 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:56:08Z |
| publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Religions |
| spelling | doaj.art-e9af212cef8e496993bfb9b72205de162023-11-19T17:57:52ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442023-10-011410133110.3390/rel14101331Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and ActionAbraham Vélez de Cea0Department of History, Philosophy and Religious Studies, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY 40475, USAPanikkar’s philosophy of mysticism is best understood as an attempt to overcome monistic and dualistic ways of thinking about the divine, human beings and the universe. Mysticism, for Panikkar, is irreducible to either monistic experiences of oneness without a second or to dualistic experiences where the divine is seen as wholly other. Rather, mysticism relates to holistic experiences of Reality and Life where the divine, the universe and human consciousness are seen as distinct yet constitutively interrelated. Mysticism has often been based on dualistic views of this life and the next, worldly existence and heavenly existence, the material and the spiritual, body and soul, and action and contemplation. These dualisms have led many to view mysticism as negating life and as an escape from this world and human activities. Panikkar’s philosophy of mysticism, however, attempts to overcome these dualisms and restores the equilibrium between the diverse yet united aspects of Reality and the human condition. This article is divided into two parts. The first part introduces Panikkar’s conception of mysticism as an anthropological dimension and as involving holistic experiences of Reality and Life. The second part examines Panikkar’s notion of pure consciousness and his understanding of mystical experiences as being the result of various mediating factors.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/10/1331mysticismmystical experiencepure consciousnesspure presencesocially engaged spiritualityPanikkar |
| spellingShingle | Abraham Vélez de Cea Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action Religions mysticism mystical experience pure consciousness pure presence socially engaged spirituality Panikkar |
| title | Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action |
| title_full | Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action |
| title_fullStr | Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action |
| title_full_unstemmed | Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action |
| title_short | Panikkar on Mysticism as a Middle Way between Contemplation and Action |
| title_sort | panikkar on mysticism as a middle way between contemplation and action |
| topic | mysticism mystical experience pure consciousness pure presence socially engaged spirituality Panikkar |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/10/1331 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT abrahamvelezdecea panikkaronmysticismasamiddlewaybetweencontemplationandaction |