Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal
(1) Background: Schwannomas of the vestibulocochlear nerve are benign, slow-growing tumors, arising from the Schwann cells. When they originate from neural elements within the vestibule or cochlea, they are defined as intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs). Cochlear implant (CI) has been reported as a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Audiology Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4349/12/1/4 |
_version_ | 1797482767895756800 |
---|---|
author | Andrea Laborai Sara Ghiselli Domenico Cuda |
author_facet | Andrea Laborai Sara Ghiselli Domenico Cuda |
author_sort | Andrea Laborai |
collection | DOAJ |
description | (1) Background: Schwannomas of the vestibulocochlear nerve are benign, slow-growing tumors, arising from the Schwann cells. When they originate from neural elements within the vestibule or cochlea, they are defined as intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs). Cochlear implant (CI) has been reported as a feasible solution for hearing restoration in these patients. (2) Methods: Two patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) due to sudden sensorineural hearing loss and ipsilateral tinnitus were the cases. MRI detected an ILS. CI was positioned using a standard round window approach without tumor removal. (3) Results: The hearing threshold was 35 dB in one case and 30 dB in the other 6 mo after activation. Speech audiometry with bisillables in quiet was 21% and 27% at 65 dB, and the tinnitus was completely resolved or reduced. In the localization test, a 25.9° error azimuth was obtained with CI on, compared to 43.2° without CI. The data log reported a daily use of 11 h and 14 h. In order to not decrease the CI’s performance, we decided not to perform tumor exeresis, but only CI surgery to restore functional binaural hearing. (4) Conclusions: These are the sixth and seventh cases in the literature of CI in patients with ILS without any tumor treatment and the first with SSD. Cochlear implant without tumor removal can be a feasible option for restoring binaural hearing without worsening the CI’s performance. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:37:12Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-e9bc768b6393442c9cf1bd682dac9597 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2039-4349 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:37:12Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Audiology Research |
spelling | doaj.art-e9bc768b6393442c9cf1bd682dac95972023-11-23T18:46:29ZengMDPI AGAudiology Research2039-43492022-01-01121334110.3390/audiolres12010004Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor RemovalAndrea Laborai0Sara Ghiselli1Domenico Cuda2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, ItalyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, ItalyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29121 Piacenza, Italy(1) Background: Schwannomas of the vestibulocochlear nerve are benign, slow-growing tumors, arising from the Schwann cells. When they originate from neural elements within the vestibule or cochlea, they are defined as intralabyrinthine schwannomas (ILSs). Cochlear implant (CI) has been reported as a feasible solution for hearing restoration in these patients. (2) Methods: Two patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) due to sudden sensorineural hearing loss and ipsilateral tinnitus were the cases. MRI detected an ILS. CI was positioned using a standard round window approach without tumor removal. (3) Results: The hearing threshold was 35 dB in one case and 30 dB in the other 6 mo after activation. Speech audiometry with bisillables in quiet was 21% and 27% at 65 dB, and the tinnitus was completely resolved or reduced. In the localization test, a 25.9° error azimuth was obtained with CI on, compared to 43.2° without CI. The data log reported a daily use of 11 h and 14 h. In order to not decrease the CI’s performance, we decided not to perform tumor exeresis, but only CI surgery to restore functional binaural hearing. (4) Conclusions: These are the sixth and seventh cases in the literature of CI in patients with ILS without any tumor treatment and the first with SSD. Cochlear implant without tumor removal can be a feasible option for restoring binaural hearing without worsening the CI’s performance.https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4349/12/1/4intralabyrinthine schwannomaacoustic schwannomacochlear implant |
spellingShingle | Andrea Laborai Sara Ghiselli Domenico Cuda Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal Audiology Research intralabyrinthine schwannoma acoustic schwannoma cochlear implant |
title | Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal |
title_full | Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal |
title_fullStr | Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal |
title_full_unstemmed | Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal |
title_short | Cochlear Implant in Patients with Intralabyrinthine Schwannoma without Tumor Removal |
title_sort | cochlear implant in patients with intralabyrinthine schwannoma without tumor removal |
topic | intralabyrinthine schwannoma acoustic schwannoma cochlear implant |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2039-4349/12/1/4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andrealaborai cochlearimplantinpatientswithintralabyrinthineschwannomawithouttumorremoval AT saraghiselli cochlearimplantinpatientswithintralabyrinthineschwannomawithouttumorremoval AT domenicocuda cochlearimplantinpatientswithintralabyrinthineschwannomawithouttumorremoval |