Validating the predictive precision of the dialogue support tool on Danish patient cohorts
Background: Despite advances in surgical techniques and diagnostics, some patients remain unsatisfied with the result following spine surgery. One way to improve patient satisfaction may be found in better alignment of expectations. Prognostic tools might prove useful in strengthening surgeon-patien...
Main Authors: | Casper Friis Pedersen, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Søren Eiskjær |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-03-01
|
Series: | North American Spine Society Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548422000919 |
Similar Items
-
A propensity-matched study of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis opting for surgery versus not
by: Casper Friis Pedersen, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
PROPOSE. Development and validation of a prediction model for shared decision making for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis
by: Casper Friis Pedersen, MSSc, PhD, et al.
Published: (2024-03-01) -
Usability and performance expectancy govern spine surgeons’ use of a clinical decision support system for shared decision-making on the choice of treatment of common lumbar degenerative disorders
by: Søren Eiskjær, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01) -
The Pharmacist Prescriber: A Psychological Perspective on Complex Conversations about Medicines: Introducing Relational Prescribing and Open Dialogue in Physical Health
by: David Rogalski, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Peer support and shared decision making in Open Dialogue: Opportunities and recommendations
by: Marta Chmielowska, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)