Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?

Fresh blueberries are prone to softening and dehydration during postharvest, which limits their competitiveness when reaching the final markets. Commercial cultivars ‘Duke’ and ‘Brigitta’ exhibit contrasting softening patterns. Although ‘Duke’ berries usually show higher firmness levels at harvest a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia Moggia, Isabel Lara, Jordi Graell, Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann, Samanta Thomas-Valdés, Gustavo A. Lobos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
Series:Horticulturae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/8/7/607
_version_ 1797406201927958528
author Claudia Moggia
Isabel Lara
Jordi Graell
Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann
Samanta Thomas-Valdés
Gustavo A. Lobos
author_facet Claudia Moggia
Isabel Lara
Jordi Graell
Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann
Samanta Thomas-Valdés
Gustavo A. Lobos
author_sort Claudia Moggia
collection DOAJ
description Fresh blueberries are prone to softening and dehydration during postharvest, which limits their competitiveness when reaching the final markets. Commercial cultivars ‘Duke’ and ‘Brigitta’ exhibit contrasting softening patterns. Although ‘Duke’ berries usually show higher firmness levels at harvest as compared to ‘Brigitta’, they display higher softening and weight loss rates after cold storage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical changes and modifications in cuticle composition of ‘Duke’ and ‘Brigitta’ blueberries across five developmental stages: green (G), 25 and 50% pink (25P, 50P), and 75 and 100% blue (75B, 100B), to determine those characters with the most influence on their postharvest behavior. For each developmental stage, maturity parameters, respiration, and ethylene production rates were assessed, and cuticular wax and cutin were analyzed. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that ‘Duke’ berries were characterized by higher respiration and ethylene production rates, while ‘Brigitta’ showed higher contents of oleanolic acid and α-amyrin over total waxes. The results suggest that larger surface/volume ratios and higher amounts of ursolic acid and lupeol in ripe fruit may underlie higher weight and firmness loss rates of ‘Duke’ berries as compared to ‘Brigitta’.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T03:21:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9c4dadc601142c0a758bd3722d57ef8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-7524
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T03:21:59Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Horticulturae
spelling doaj.art-e9c4dadc601142c0a758bd3722d57ef82023-12-03T15:08:23ZengMDPI AGHorticulturae2311-75242022-07-018760710.3390/horticulturae8070607Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?Claudia Moggia0Isabel Lara1Jordi Graell2Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann3Samanta Thomas-Valdés4Gustavo A. Lobos5Plant Breeding and Phenomic Center, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Campus Lircay, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, ChileBiologia i Tecnologia de Postcollita-XIA, Centre AGROTÈCNIO, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainBiologia i Tecnologia de Postcollita-XIA, Centre AGROTÈCNIO, Universitat de Lleida, Alcalde Rovira Roure 191, 25198 Lleida, SpainLaboratorio de Química de Productos Naturales, Instituto de Química de Recursos Naturales, Campus Lircay, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, ChileEscuela de Nutrición y Dietética, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, ChilePlant Breeding and Phenomic Center, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Campus Lircay, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3460000, ChileFresh blueberries are prone to softening and dehydration during postharvest, which limits their competitiveness when reaching the final markets. Commercial cultivars ‘Duke’ and ‘Brigitta’ exhibit contrasting softening patterns. Although ‘Duke’ berries usually show higher firmness levels at harvest as compared to ‘Brigitta’, they display higher softening and weight loss rates after cold storage. The aim of this study was to evaluate the physicochemical changes and modifications in cuticle composition of ‘Duke’ and ‘Brigitta’ blueberries across five developmental stages: green (G), 25 and 50% pink (25P, 50P), and 75 and 100% blue (75B, 100B), to determine those characters with the most influence on their postharvest behavior. For each developmental stage, maturity parameters, respiration, and ethylene production rates were assessed, and cuticular wax and cutin were analyzed. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that ‘Duke’ berries were characterized by higher respiration and ethylene production rates, while ‘Brigitta’ showed higher contents of oleanolic acid and α-amyrin over total waxes. The results suggest that larger surface/volume ratios and higher amounts of ursolic acid and lupeol in ripe fruit may underlie higher weight and firmness loss rates of ‘Duke’ berries as compared to ‘Brigitta’.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/8/7/607blueberrycuticlecutinethylene productionrespiration rateursolic acid
spellingShingle Claudia Moggia
Isabel Lara
Jordi Graell
Guillermo Schmeda-Hirschmann
Samanta Thomas-Valdés
Gustavo A. Lobos
Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
Horticulturae
blueberry
cuticle
cutin
ethylene production
respiration rate
ursolic acid
title Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
title_full Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
title_fullStr Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
title_full_unstemmed Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
title_short Are Fruit Surface Differences in Two Blueberry Cultivars Major Drivers of Contrasting Postharvest Dynamics?
title_sort are fruit surface differences in two blueberry cultivars major drivers of contrasting postharvest dynamics
topic blueberry
cuticle
cutin
ethylene production
respiration rate
ursolic acid
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/8/7/607
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiamoggia arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics
AT isabellara arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics
AT jordigraell arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics
AT guillermoschmedahirschmann arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics
AT samantathomasvaldes arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics
AT gustavoalobos arefruitsurfacedifferencesintwoblueberrycultivarsmajordriversofcontrastingpostharvestdynamics