4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Older patients with HL have worse outcomes than younger patients, which may reflect treatment selection, including fewer chemotherapy cycles. Immortal time bias exists when patients must survival to initiation, and even completion, of treatment. We described treatment length and de...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angie Mae Rodday, Theresa Hahn, Peter K Lindenauer, Susan K Parsons
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612000151X/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811155066692829184
author Angie Mae Rodday
Theresa Hahn
Peter K Lindenauer
Susan K Parsons
author_facet Angie Mae Rodday
Theresa Hahn
Peter K Lindenauer
Susan K Parsons
author_sort Angie Mae Rodday
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Older patients with HL have worse outcomes than younger patients, which may reflect treatment selection, including fewer chemotherapy cycles. Immortal time bias exists when patients must survival to initiation, and even completion, of treatment. We described treatment length and death to evaluate the extent of immortal time bias. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This retrospective cohort study utilized SEER-Medicare data from 1999-2014. Patients diagnosed with incident advanced stage HL at age ≥65 years and enrolled in Medicare Part A and B fee for service were included. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment initiated within 4 months of diagnosis was determined from inpatient, outpatient, and physician/supplier claims. No treatment was defined by lack of treatment claims. Dates from claims were used to define length of treatment; ≥4 months of treatment indicated complete chemotherapy cycles. Date of death was obtained from Medicare data. Analyses were limited to 1 year post-diagnosis. Summary statistics were used to describe treatment length and subsequent death. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We included 1492 advanced stage HL patients with a mean age of 76 years (SD = 7). 428 (29%) patients had no documented treatment; 397 (27%) were treated <4 months indicating fewer chemotherapy cycles; and 667 (45%) were treated for ≥4 months indicating complete chemotherapy cycles. Among those with no documented treatment, 15% died within 1 month of diagnosis with 78% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. Among those treated <4 months, 36% died within 1 month of their last treatment claim with 64% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. Among those treated ≥4 months, 7% died within 1 month of their last treatment claim with 14% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Few untreated patients died within 1 month of diagnosis. One-third of patients treated <4 months died soon after completion of treatment, while patients treated longer survived longer, suggesting some patients did not survive to complete treatment. To account for this immortal time bias, landmark analysis will be used to assess the relationship between treatment and survival.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:27:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9c9e122d6e34d3ca53bbaa43fd9efb4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:27:54Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-e9c9e122d6e34d3ca53bbaa43fd9efb42023-03-10T08:51:37ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612020-06-014393910.1017/cts.2020.1514074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare DataAngie Mae Rodday0Theresa Hahn1Peter K Lindenauer2Susan K Parsons3Tufts UniversityRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer CenterBaystate HealthTufts Medical CenterOBJECTIVES/GOALS: Older patients with HL have worse outcomes than younger patients, which may reflect treatment selection, including fewer chemotherapy cycles. Immortal time bias exists when patients must survival to initiation, and even completion, of treatment. We described treatment length and death to evaluate the extent of immortal time bias. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This retrospective cohort study utilized SEER-Medicare data from 1999-2014. Patients diagnosed with incident advanced stage HL at age ≥65 years and enrolled in Medicare Part A and B fee for service were included. Chemotherapy or radiotherapy treatment initiated within 4 months of diagnosis was determined from inpatient, outpatient, and physician/supplier claims. No treatment was defined by lack of treatment claims. Dates from claims were used to define length of treatment; ≥4 months of treatment indicated complete chemotherapy cycles. Date of death was obtained from Medicare data. Analyses were limited to 1 year post-diagnosis. Summary statistics were used to describe treatment length and subsequent death. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We included 1492 advanced stage HL patients with a mean age of 76 years (SD = 7). 428 (29%) patients had no documented treatment; 397 (27%) were treated <4 months indicating fewer chemotherapy cycles; and 667 (45%) were treated for ≥4 months indicating complete chemotherapy cycles. Among those with no documented treatment, 15% died within 1 month of diagnosis with 78% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. Among those treated <4 months, 36% died within 1 month of their last treatment claim with 64% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. Among those treated ≥4 months, 7% died within 1 month of their last treatment claim with 14% dying by 1 year post-diagnosis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Few untreated patients died within 1 month of diagnosis. One-third of patients treated <4 months died soon after completion of treatment, while patients treated longer survived longer, suggesting some patients did not survive to complete treatment. To account for this immortal time bias, landmark analysis will be used to assess the relationship between treatment and survival.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612000151X/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Angie Mae Rodday
Theresa Hahn
Peter K Lindenauer
Susan K Parsons
4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
title_full 4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
title_fullStr 4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
title_full_unstemmed 4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
title_short 4074 The Role of Immortal Time Bias When Linking Treatment to Outcomes among Older Patients with Incident Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) using Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare Data
title_sort 4074 the role of immortal time bias when linking treatment to outcomes among older patients with incident hodgkin lymphoma hl using surveillance epidemiology and end results seer medicare data
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S205986612000151X/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT angiemaerodday 4074theroleofimmortaltimebiaswhenlinkingtreatmenttooutcomesamongolderpatientswithincidenthodgkinlymphomahlusingsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseermedicaredata
AT theresahahn 4074theroleofimmortaltimebiaswhenlinkingtreatmenttooutcomesamongolderpatientswithincidenthodgkinlymphomahlusingsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseermedicaredata
AT peterklindenauer 4074theroleofimmortaltimebiaswhenlinkingtreatmenttooutcomesamongolderpatientswithincidenthodgkinlymphomahlusingsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseermedicaredata
AT susankparsons 4074theroleofimmortaltimebiaswhenlinkingtreatmenttooutcomesamongolderpatientswithincidenthodgkinlymphomahlusingsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsseermedicaredata