Should negatory action against immissions be reformed in the light of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the right to live in a healthy environment?
In this paper, the authors rely on the results of scientific research based on which they concluded that although there are notable differences between the Croatian national regulation of immission protection and the one provided by the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fund...
Main Authors: | Mihelčić Gabrijela, Marochini-Zrinski Maša |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bar Association of Vojvodina, Novi Sad
2022-01-01
|
Series: | Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0017-0933/2022/0017-09332203767M.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Lawsuits for removal of neighboring immissions
by: Salma Marija
Published: (2011-01-01) -
Limitation period and negatory action: review of case law, reflections and problems
by: O. R. Shyshka
Published: (2022-03-01) -
The paternal right to respect for family life: Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights against the Republic of Croatia
by: Marochini-Zrinski Maša
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Conventional agricultural land use and immissions of genetically modified organisms
by: Nikolić Dušan, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Burden of proof for the illegal immissions as prerequisite of in rem removal claim
by: Knežević Marko
Published: (2013-01-01)