Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors

Abstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertensi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sunmi Jung, Jihyun Park, Young-Gyun Seo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2021-08-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96874-8
_version_ 1818430344694595584
author Sunmi Jung
Jihyun Park
Young-Gyun Seo
author_facet Sunmi Jung
Jihyun Park
Young-Gyun Seo
author_sort Sunmi Jung
collection DOAJ
description Abstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) according to the arm-to-leg ratio and limbs-to-trunk ratio for FM and FFM was compared, respectively. The higher the arm-to-leg FM ratio, the higher the prevalence of CVD-RF (DM-male-OR 7.04, 95% CI 4.22–11.74; DM-female-OR 10.57, 95% CI 5.80–19.26; MetS-male-OR 4.47, 95% CI 3.41- 5.86; MetS-female-OR 8.73, 95% CI 6.38–11.95). The higher the limbs-to-trunk FM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.21; DM-female-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.23; MetS-male-OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08; MetS-female-OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01–0.04), the higher the limbs-to-trunk FFM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.31; DM-female-OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70; MetS-male-OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31–0.50; MetS-female-OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and the higher the arm-to-leg FFM ratio (MetS-male-OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.94; MetS-female-OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92), the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF. The higher the FM of the legs compared to the arms, FFM of the arms compared to the legs, and FM or FFM of the limbs compared to the trunk, the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T15:31:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2045-2322
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T15:31:55Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj.art-e9d2b667d18345568001085da57e88c12022-12-21T22:55:51ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222021-08-0111111210.1038/s41598-021-96874-8Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factorsSunmi Jung0Jihyun Park1Young-Gyun Seo2Department of Family Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalDepartment of Family Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalDepartment of Family Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalAbstract We aimed to analyze the relationship of the distribution of body fat mass (FM) and fat-free mass (FFM) in the limbs and trunk with the prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVD-RF). In total, 13,032 adults were selected from the KNHANES (2008–2011). The prevalence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and metabolic syndrome (MetS) according to the arm-to-leg ratio and limbs-to-trunk ratio for FM and FFM was compared, respectively. The higher the arm-to-leg FM ratio, the higher the prevalence of CVD-RF (DM-male-OR 7.04, 95% CI 4.22–11.74; DM-female-OR 10.57, 95% CI 5.80–19.26; MetS-male-OR 4.47, 95% CI 3.41- 5.86; MetS-female-OR 8.73, 95% CI 6.38–11.95). The higher the limbs-to-trunk FM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.07–0.21; DM-female-OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.06–0.23; MetS-male-OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.04–0.08; MetS-female-OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.01–0.04), the higher the limbs-to-trunk FFM ratio (DM-male-OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.11–0.31; DM-female-OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.70; MetS-male-OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.31–0.50; MetS-female-OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.50–0.78), and the higher the arm-to-leg FFM ratio (MetS-male-OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59–0.94; MetS-female-OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.92), the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF. The higher the FM of the legs compared to the arms, FFM of the arms compared to the legs, and FM or FFM of the limbs compared to the trunk, the lower the prevalence of CVD-RF.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96874-8
spellingShingle Sunmi Jung
Jihyun Park
Young-Gyun Seo
Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
Scientific Reports
title Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_full Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_fullStr Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_short Relationship between arm-to-leg and limbs-to-trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
title_sort relationship between arm to leg and limbs to trunk body composition ratio and cardiovascular disease risk factors
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96874-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sunmijung relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors
AT jihyunpark relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors
AT younggyunseo relationshipbetweenarmtolegandlimbstotrunkbodycompositionratioandcardiovasculardiseaseriskfactors