Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Enzymes for plant cell wall deconstruction are a major cost in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. The goal of this research was to develop optimized synthetic mixtures of enzymes for multiple pretreatment/substra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walton Jonathan D, Borrusch Melissa S, Scott-Craig John S, Car Suzana, Banerjee Goutami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-10-01
Series:Biotechnology for Biofuels
Online Access:http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/3/1/22
_version_ 1818466178944729088
author Walton Jonathan D
Borrusch Melissa S
Scott-Craig John S
Car Suzana
Banerjee Goutami
author_facet Walton Jonathan D
Borrusch Melissa S
Scott-Craig John S
Car Suzana
Banerjee Goutami
author_sort Walton Jonathan D
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Enzymes for plant cell wall deconstruction are a major cost in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. The goal of this research was to develop optimized synthetic mixtures of enzymes for multiple pretreatment/substrate combinations using our high-throughput biomass digestion platform, GENPLAT, which combines robotic liquid handling, statistical experimental design and automated Glc and Xyl assays. Proportions of six core fungal enzymes (CBH1, CBH2, EG1, β-glucosidase, a GH10 endo-β1,4-xylanase, and β-xylosidase) were optimized at a fixed enzyme loading of 15 mg/g glucan for release of Glc and Xyl from all combinations of five biomass feedstocks (corn stover, switchgrass, <it>Miscanthus</it>, dried distillers' grains plus solubles [DDGS] and poplar) subjected to three alkaline pretreatments (AFEX, dilute base [0.25% NaOH] and alkaline peroxide [AP]). A 16-component mixture comprising the core set plus 10 accessory enzymes was optimized for three pretreatment/substrate combinations. Results were compared to the performance of two commercial enzymes (Accellerase 1000 and Spezyme CP) at the same protein loadings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>When analyzed with GENPLAT, corn stover gave the highest yields of Glc with commercial enzymes and with the core set with all pretreatments, whereas corn stover, switchgrass and <it>Miscanthus </it>gave comparable Xyl yields. With commercial enzymes and with the core set, yields of Glc and Xyl were highest for grass stovers pretreated by AP compared to AFEX or dilute base. Corn stover, switchgrass and DDGS pretreated with AFEX and digested with the core set required a higher proportion of endo-β1,4-xylanase (EX3) and a lower proportion of endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1) compared to the same materials pretreated with dilute base or AP. An optimized enzyme mixture containing 16 components (by addition of α-glucuronidase, a GH11 endoxylanase [EX2], Cel5A, Cel61A, Cip1, Cip2, β-mannanase, amyloglucosidase, α-arabinosidase, and Cel12A to the core set) was determined for AFEX-pretreated corn stover, DDGS, and AP-pretreated corn stover. The optimized mixture for AP-corn stover contained more exo-β1,4-glucanase (i.e., the sum of CBH1 + CBH2) and less endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1 + Cel5A) than the optimal mixture for AFEX-corn stover. Amyloglucosidase and β-mannanase were the two most important enzymes for release of Glc from DDGS but were not required (i.e., 0% optimum) for corn stover subjected to AP or AFEX. As a function of enzyme loading over the range 0 to 30 mg/g glucan, Glc release from AP-corn stover reached a plateau of 60-70% Glc yield at a lower enzyme loading (5-10 mg/g glucan) than AFEX-corn stover. Accellerase 1000 was superior to Spezyme CP, the core set or the 16-component mixture for Glc yield at 12 h, but the 16-component set was as effective as the commercial enzyme mixtures at 48 h.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results in this paper demonstrate that GENPLAT can be used to rapidly produce enzyme cocktails for specific pretreatment/biomass combinations. Pretreatment conditions and feedstock source both influence the Glc and Xyl yields as well as optimal enzyme proportions. It is predicted that it will be possible to improve synthetic enzyme mixtures further by the addition of additional accessory enzymes.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T20:54:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9e22163406c49c3971d8043ae855e08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1754-6834
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T20:54:58Z
publishDate 2010-10-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Biotechnology for Biofuels
spelling doaj.art-e9e22163406c49c3971d8043ae855e082022-12-22T02:30:21ZengBMCBiotechnology for Biofuels1754-68342010-10-01312210.1186/1754-6834-3-22Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinationsWalton Jonathan DBorrusch Melissa SScott-Craig John SCar SuzanaBanerjee Goutami<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Enzymes for plant cell wall deconstruction are a major cost in the production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. The goal of this research was to develop optimized synthetic mixtures of enzymes for multiple pretreatment/substrate combinations using our high-throughput biomass digestion platform, GENPLAT, which combines robotic liquid handling, statistical experimental design and automated Glc and Xyl assays. Proportions of six core fungal enzymes (CBH1, CBH2, EG1, β-glucosidase, a GH10 endo-β1,4-xylanase, and β-xylosidase) were optimized at a fixed enzyme loading of 15 mg/g glucan for release of Glc and Xyl from all combinations of five biomass feedstocks (corn stover, switchgrass, <it>Miscanthus</it>, dried distillers' grains plus solubles [DDGS] and poplar) subjected to three alkaline pretreatments (AFEX, dilute base [0.25% NaOH] and alkaline peroxide [AP]). A 16-component mixture comprising the core set plus 10 accessory enzymes was optimized for three pretreatment/substrate combinations. Results were compared to the performance of two commercial enzymes (Accellerase 1000 and Spezyme CP) at the same protein loadings.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>When analyzed with GENPLAT, corn stover gave the highest yields of Glc with commercial enzymes and with the core set with all pretreatments, whereas corn stover, switchgrass and <it>Miscanthus </it>gave comparable Xyl yields. With commercial enzymes and with the core set, yields of Glc and Xyl were highest for grass stovers pretreated by AP compared to AFEX or dilute base. Corn stover, switchgrass and DDGS pretreated with AFEX and digested with the core set required a higher proportion of endo-β1,4-xylanase (EX3) and a lower proportion of endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1) compared to the same materials pretreated with dilute base or AP. An optimized enzyme mixture containing 16 components (by addition of α-glucuronidase, a GH11 endoxylanase [EX2], Cel5A, Cel61A, Cip1, Cip2, β-mannanase, amyloglucosidase, α-arabinosidase, and Cel12A to the core set) was determined for AFEX-pretreated corn stover, DDGS, and AP-pretreated corn stover. The optimized mixture for AP-corn stover contained more exo-β1,4-glucanase (i.e., the sum of CBH1 + CBH2) and less endo-β1,4-glucanase (EG1 + Cel5A) than the optimal mixture for AFEX-corn stover. Amyloglucosidase and β-mannanase were the two most important enzymes for release of Glc from DDGS but were not required (i.e., 0% optimum) for corn stover subjected to AP or AFEX. As a function of enzyme loading over the range 0 to 30 mg/g glucan, Glc release from AP-corn stover reached a plateau of 60-70% Glc yield at a lower enzyme loading (5-10 mg/g glucan) than AFEX-corn stover. Accellerase 1000 was superior to Spezyme CP, the core set or the 16-component mixture for Glc yield at 12 h, but the 16-component set was as effective as the commercial enzyme mixtures at 48 h.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The results in this paper demonstrate that GENPLAT can be used to rapidly produce enzyme cocktails for specific pretreatment/biomass combinations. Pretreatment conditions and feedstock source both influence the Glc and Xyl yields as well as optimal enzyme proportions. It is predicted that it will be possible to improve synthetic enzyme mixtures further by the addition of additional accessory enzymes.</p>http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/3/1/22
spellingShingle Walton Jonathan D
Borrusch Melissa S
Scott-Craig John S
Car Suzana
Banerjee Goutami
Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
Biotechnology for Biofuels
title Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
title_full Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
title_fullStr Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
title_full_unstemmed Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
title_short Rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment/biomass feedstock combinations
title_sort rapid optimization of enzyme mixtures for deconstruction of diverse pretreatment biomass feedstock combinations
url http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/content/3/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT waltonjonathand rapidoptimizationofenzymemixturesfordeconstructionofdiversepretreatmentbiomassfeedstockcombinations
AT borruschmelissas rapidoptimizationofenzymemixturesfordeconstructionofdiversepretreatmentbiomassfeedstockcombinations
AT scottcraigjohns rapidoptimizationofenzymemixturesfordeconstructionofdiversepretreatmentbiomassfeedstockcombinations
AT carsuzana rapidoptimizationofenzymemixturesfordeconstructionofdiversepretreatmentbiomassfeedstockcombinations
AT banerjeegoutami rapidoptimizationofenzymemixturesfordeconstructionofdiversepretreatmentbiomassfeedstockcombinations