Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa

Abstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ioanni Delsante
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído
Series:Ambiente Construído
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811263983561211904
author Ioanni Delsante
author_facet Ioanni Delsante
author_sort Ioanni Delsante
collection DOAJ
description Abstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T19:54:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9e80cc8acfa4bfba8f2595c7c4dfbb1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1678-8621
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T19:54:58Z
publisher Associação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído
record_format Article
series Ambiente Construído
spelling doaj.art-e9e80cc8acfa4bfba8f2595c7c4dfbb12022-12-22T03:18:41ZengAssociação Nacional de Tecnologia do Ambiente ConstruídoAmbiente Construído1678-862116372210.1590/s1678-86212016000300089S1678-86212016000300007Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and GenoaIoanni DelsanteAbstract One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007&lng=en&tlng=enUrban quality assessmentNeighbourhood scaleQualitative and quantitative urban indicatorsMedium-density neighbourhoods
spellingShingle Ioanni Delsante
Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
Ambiente Construído
Urban quality assessment
Neighbourhood scale
Qualitative and quantitative urban indicators
Medium-density neighbourhoods
title Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
title_full Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
title_fullStr Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
title_full_unstemmed Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
title_short Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa
title_sort urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium density neighbourhoods a comparative case study of lodi and genoa
topic Urban quality assessment
Neighbourhood scale
Qualitative and quantitative urban indicators
Medium-density neighbourhoods
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1678-86212016000300007&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT ioannidelsante urbanenvironmentqualityassessmentusingamethodologyandsetofindicatorsformediumdensityneighbourhoodsacomparativecasestudyoflodiandgenoa