Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

Abstract Background Contiguous double-level lumbar spondylolytic spondylolisthesis is an extremely rare condition. There is a paucity of data of lumbosacral deformity and sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment among these patients. Moreover, the effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chang-zhi Du, Song Li, Liang Xu, Qing-shuang Zhou, Ze-zhang Zhu, Xu Sun, Yong Qiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1197-7
_version_ 1811187042628927488
author Chang-zhi Du
Song Li
Liang Xu
Qing-shuang Zhou
Ze-zhang Zhu
Xu Sun
Yong Qiu
author_facet Chang-zhi Du
Song Li
Liang Xu
Qing-shuang Zhou
Ze-zhang Zhu
Xu Sun
Yong Qiu
author_sort Chang-zhi Du
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Contiguous double-level lumbar spondylolytic spondylolisthesis is an extremely rare condition. There is a paucity of data of lumbosacral deformity and sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment among these patients. Moreover, the effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on sagittal realignment still remains largely unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the reconstruction of sagittal alignment and the improvement of clinical outcomes after posterior instrumented double-level or single-level TLIF. Methods From January 2010 to September 2018, the records of patients with contiguous L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had undergone double-level or single-level TLIF and a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up were included. The slippage parameters and spino-pelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. Results A total of 58 patients (21 males and 37 females, mean age of 57.1 ± 6.9 years) were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients were treated with double-level TLIF and the remaining 20 with single-level TLIF (L4/5 in 14; L5/S1 in 6). After surgery, the spondylolisthesis was significantly reduced at both L4/5 and L5/S1 level (all P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in pelvic tilt (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in sacral slope (P < 0.001). Significant increase in L4–S1 height (P < 0.001) and L4–S1 lordosis (P = 0.012) and decrease in L5 slope (P = 0.004) and L5 incidence (P = 0.001) were also observed. Compared to single-level TLIF, double-level TLIF increased L4–S1 height (P < 0.001) and L4–S1 lordosis (P < 0.001) and reduced L4-SVA (P = 0.007) and L5 incidence (P = 0.013) more obviously, and the sagittal balance was better corrected in double-level TLIF group (P = 0.006). Double-level TLIF group showed larger increase in VAS scores for low back pain. The incidence of implant-related complications was lower in the double-level group. Conclusion Posterior short-segment instrumented TLIF can bring favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Double-level TLIF is more efficient to improve L4–S1 height, regional lumbar lordosis, and global sagittal balance.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:56:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9f3d5e32ec84a3ebd1a29f2ffb8f267
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:56:30Z
publishDate 2019-05-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-e9f3d5e32ec84a3ebd1a29f2ffb8f2672022-12-22T04:20:20ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2019-05-0114111010.1186/s13018-019-1197-7Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionChang-zhi Du0Song Li1Liang Xu2Qing-shuang Zhou3Ze-zhang Zhu4Xu Sun5Yong Qiu6Department of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical UniversityDepartment of Spine Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Clinical College of Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract Background Contiguous double-level lumbar spondylolytic spondylolisthesis is an extremely rare condition. There is a paucity of data of lumbosacral deformity and sagittal spino-pelvic malalignment among these patients. Moreover, the effect of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on sagittal realignment still remains largely unknown. The aim of the study is to investigate the reconstruction of sagittal alignment and the improvement of clinical outcomes after posterior instrumented double-level or single-level TLIF. Methods From January 2010 to September 2018, the records of patients with contiguous L4/5 and L5/S1 double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had undergone double-level or single-level TLIF and a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up were included. The slippage parameters and spino-pelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. Results A total of 58 patients (21 males and 37 females, mean age of 57.1 ± 6.9 years) were enrolled. Thirty-eight patients were treated with double-level TLIF and the remaining 20 with single-level TLIF (L4/5 in 14; L5/S1 in 6). After surgery, the spondylolisthesis was significantly reduced at both L4/5 and L5/S1 level (all P < 0.001). There was a significant reduction in pelvic tilt (P < 0.001) and a significant increase in sacral slope (P < 0.001). Significant increase in L4–S1 height (P < 0.001) and L4–S1 lordosis (P = 0.012) and decrease in L5 slope (P = 0.004) and L5 incidence (P = 0.001) were also observed. Compared to single-level TLIF, double-level TLIF increased L4–S1 height (P < 0.001) and L4–S1 lordosis (P < 0.001) and reduced L4-SVA (P = 0.007) and L5 incidence (P = 0.013) more obviously, and the sagittal balance was better corrected in double-level TLIF group (P = 0.006). Double-level TLIF group showed larger increase in VAS scores for low back pain. The incidence of implant-related complications was lower in the double-level group. Conclusion Posterior short-segment instrumented TLIF can bring favorable radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Double-level TLIF is more efficient to improve L4–S1 height, regional lumbar lordosis, and global sagittal balance.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1197-7Double-level spondylolysisIsthmic spondylolisthesisSpino-pelvic parametersTransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
spellingShingle Chang-zhi Du
Song Li
Liang Xu
Qing-shuang Zhou
Ze-zhang Zhu
Xu Sun
Yong Qiu
Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Double-level spondylolysis
Isthmic spondylolisthesis
Spino-pelvic parameters
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_full Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_fullStr Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_full_unstemmed Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_short Sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double-level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis: a comparison of double-level and single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
title_sort sagittal reconstruction of lumbosacral contiguous double level spondylolytic spondylolisthesis a comparison of double level and single level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
topic Double-level spondylolysis
Isthmic spondylolisthesis
Spino-pelvic parameters
Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-019-1197-7
work_keys_str_mv AT changzhidu sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT songli sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT liangxu sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT qingshuangzhou sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT zezhangzhu sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT xusun sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT yongqiu sagittalreconstructionoflumbosacralcontiguousdoublelevelspondylolyticspondylolisthesisacomparisonofdoublelevelandsingleleveltransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusion