Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens

Background: In the changing world of clinicopathologic practice where surgeons and pathologists are faced with increasing therapeutic demands, precise demands of each group from the other have often been reduced to blames and counter-blames. This study is thus aimed at auditing the current practice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Akinfenwa T Atanda, Solomon Raphael
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Nigerian Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/article.asp?issn=1117-6806;year=2013;volume=19;issue=2;spage=68;epage=72;aulast=Atanda
_version_ 1819069638178242560
author Akinfenwa T Atanda
Solomon Raphael
author_facet Akinfenwa T Atanda
Solomon Raphael
author_sort Akinfenwa T Atanda
collection DOAJ
description Background: In the changing world of clinicopathologic practice where surgeons and pathologists are faced with increasing therapeutic demands, precise demands of each group from the other have often been reduced to blames and counter-blames. This study is thus aimed at auditing the current practice of specimen handling as a means of highlighting areas where mutual best practice is required. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 specimens and 100 separate request cards received over the 3 months were audited for: Use of fixative, adequacy of fixative used, types of specimen containers and appropriate labeling of containers. The request cards were audited for: Documentation of patients′ hospital numbers, ages, histories of disease, sites of biopsy, examination findings, investigations done, provisional diagnosis and concordance of clinical diagnosis with histopathological diagnosis. Results: About 20% of specimens were unfixed, 23.5% had inadequate fixative, 16.5% were in inappropriate containers and 32.5% were incompletely labeled respectively. In 25%, 50% and 53% of forms the age, clinical history and examination findings respectively were not documented. Provisional diagnosis was in concordance with eventual histological diagnosis in 69% of cases. Conclusion: To ensure the quality of histopathological diagnosis with minimal turnaround time, the surgeon plays a vital role by ensuring adequate and prompt fixation of tissue biopsies, put in the right container and accompanied by well labeled request cards.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:53:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9f490f011da4a23bf0e76426a28cd99
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1117-6806
2278-7100
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:53:13Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Nigerian Journal of Surgery
spelling doaj.art-e9f490f011da4a23bf0e76426a28cd992022-12-21T18:56:49ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNigerian Journal of Surgery1117-68062278-71002013-01-01192687210.4103/1117-6806.119242Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimensAkinfenwa T AtandaSolomon RaphaelBackground: In the changing world of clinicopathologic practice where surgeons and pathologists are faced with increasing therapeutic demands, precise demands of each group from the other have often been reduced to blames and counter-blames. This study is thus aimed at auditing the current practice of specimen handling as a means of highlighting areas where mutual best practice is required. Materials and Methods: A total of 200 specimens and 100 separate request cards received over the 3 months were audited for: Use of fixative, adequacy of fixative used, types of specimen containers and appropriate labeling of containers. The request cards were audited for: Documentation of patients′ hospital numbers, ages, histories of disease, sites of biopsy, examination findings, investigations done, provisional diagnosis and concordance of clinical diagnosis with histopathological diagnosis. Results: About 20% of specimens were unfixed, 23.5% had inadequate fixative, 16.5% were in inappropriate containers and 32.5% were incompletely labeled respectively. In 25%, 50% and 53% of forms the age, clinical history and examination findings respectively were not documented. Provisional diagnosis was in concordance with eventual histological diagnosis in 69% of cases. Conclusion: To ensure the quality of histopathological diagnosis with minimal turnaround time, the surgeon plays a vital role by ensuring adequate and prompt fixation of tissue biopsies, put in the right container and accompanied by well labeled request cards.http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/article.asp?issn=1117-6806;year=2013;volume=19;issue=2;spage=68;epage=72;aulast=AtandaFormalinfixativeoutcomepathologistsurgeon
spellingShingle Akinfenwa T Atanda
Solomon Raphael
Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
Nigerian Journal of Surgery
Formalin
fixative
outcome
pathologist
surgeon
title Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
title_full Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
title_fullStr Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
title_full_unstemmed Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
title_short Role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
title_sort role of surgeons in determining outcome of histopathology specimens
topic Formalin
fixative
outcome
pathologist
surgeon
url http://www.nigerianjsurg.com/article.asp?issn=1117-6806;year=2013;volume=19;issue=2;spage=68;epage=72;aulast=Atanda
work_keys_str_mv AT akinfenwatatanda roleofsurgeonsindeterminingoutcomeofhistopathologyspecimens
AT solomonraphael roleofsurgeonsindeterminingoutcomeofhistopathologyspecimens