Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond

Abstract Cost‐effective and accurate quantification of biodiversity is important for biodiversity conservation, resource management, and forecasting. Traditional monitoring approaches have relied on direct observations, remote sensing, and mark‐recapture techniques, providing insights into species e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Niamh Eastwood, Stephen Kissane, Lewis Campbell, Andrew G. Briscoe, Bastian Egeter, Luisa Orsini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.515
_version_ 1797277052989079552
author Niamh Eastwood
Stephen Kissane
Lewis Campbell
Andrew G. Briscoe
Bastian Egeter
Luisa Orsini
author_facet Niamh Eastwood
Stephen Kissane
Lewis Campbell
Andrew G. Briscoe
Bastian Egeter
Luisa Orsini
author_sort Niamh Eastwood
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Cost‐effective and accurate quantification of biodiversity is important for biodiversity conservation, resource management, and forecasting. Traditional monitoring approaches have relied on direct observations, remote sensing, and mark‐recapture techniques, providing insights into species ecology and the impact of pollution and climate change on indicator species. However, these techniques are typically low throughput, expensive, and can be invasive. In addition, they cannot detect cryptic diversity and are biased toward species that leave identifiable remains. DNA‐based methods, such as metabarcoding or single marker gene assays, have enabled high throughput screening of a wide range of taxonomic groups, including ones without well‐preserved remains. When compared with traditional techniques, these approaches have high throughput, can resolve cryptic diversity, do not require taxonomic specialist skills, and are non‐invasive. However, although they are comparatively cheaper than traditional approaches, they are expensive when applied at the community‐level as single marker assays are amplified and sequenced independently. Multilocus approaches in which multiple gene markers are amplified in a single reaction are desirable to deliver community‐level assessments in a cost‐effective manner. Yet, they are uncommon because of technical challenges that may lead to biases in downstream analyses, such as index hopping and unbalanced representation of taxonomic groups. Here, we developed a highly multiplexed protocol that combines the early pooling of marker genes that target broad taxonomic groups and taxon‐specific markers in a single tube reaction. This step is followed by the pooling of up to 384 samples per locus (N = 15,636 samples) with unique dual‐indexed sequencing adapters in a single sequencing run. This approach dramatically reduces the costs of community‐level biodiversity quantification and lowers the need for input DNA without compromising output quality. We optimized the multiplex assay on lake freshwater sediment samples and benchmarked the assay on samples from other environmental matrices, demonstrating its direct application to the river and marine communities.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:38:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-e9f76cebda8145b095a05b3ba5634bde
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2637-4943
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:38:07Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj.art-e9f76cebda8145b095a05b3ba5634bde2024-03-05T09:32:37ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432024-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/edn3.515Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyondNiamh Eastwood0Stephen Kissane1Lewis Campbell2Andrew G. Briscoe3Bastian Egeter4Luisa Orsini5Environmental Genomics Group, School of Biosciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UKEnvironmental Genomics Group, School of Biosciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UKNatureMetrics Ltd. Surrey Research Park Guildford UKNatureMetrics Ltd. Surrey Research Park Guildford UKNatureMetrics Ltd. Surrey Research Park Guildford UKEnvironmental Genomics Group, School of Biosciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UKAbstract Cost‐effective and accurate quantification of biodiversity is important for biodiversity conservation, resource management, and forecasting. Traditional monitoring approaches have relied on direct observations, remote sensing, and mark‐recapture techniques, providing insights into species ecology and the impact of pollution and climate change on indicator species. However, these techniques are typically low throughput, expensive, and can be invasive. In addition, they cannot detect cryptic diversity and are biased toward species that leave identifiable remains. DNA‐based methods, such as metabarcoding or single marker gene assays, have enabled high throughput screening of a wide range of taxonomic groups, including ones without well‐preserved remains. When compared with traditional techniques, these approaches have high throughput, can resolve cryptic diversity, do not require taxonomic specialist skills, and are non‐invasive. However, although they are comparatively cheaper than traditional approaches, they are expensive when applied at the community‐level as single marker assays are amplified and sequenced independently. Multilocus approaches in which multiple gene markers are amplified in a single reaction are desirable to deliver community‐level assessments in a cost‐effective manner. Yet, they are uncommon because of technical challenges that may lead to biases in downstream analyses, such as index hopping and unbalanced representation of taxonomic groups. Here, we developed a highly multiplexed protocol that combines the early pooling of marker genes that target broad taxonomic groups and taxon‐specific markers in a single tube reaction. This step is followed by the pooling of up to 384 samples per locus (N = 15,636 samples) with unique dual‐indexed sequencing adapters in a single sequencing run. This approach dramatically reduces the costs of community‐level biodiversity quantification and lowers the need for input DNA without compromising output quality. We optimized the multiplex assay on lake freshwater sediment samples and benchmarked the assay on samples from other environmental matrices, demonstrating its direct application to the river and marine communities.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.515eDNAfreshwatermarinemetabarcodingmultiplexsediment
spellingShingle Niamh Eastwood
Stephen Kissane
Lewis Campbell
Andrew G. Briscoe
Bastian Egeter
Luisa Orsini
Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
Environmental DNA
eDNA
freshwater
marine
metabarcoding
multiplex
sediment
title Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
title_full Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
title_fullStr Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
title_full_unstemmed Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
title_short Single metabarcoding multiplex captures community‐level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
title_sort single metabarcoding multiplex captures community level freshwater biodiversity and beyond
topic eDNA
freshwater
marine
metabarcoding
multiplex
sediment
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.515
work_keys_str_mv AT niamheastwood singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond
AT stephenkissane singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond
AT lewiscampbell singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond
AT andrewgbriscoe singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond
AT bastianegeter singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond
AT luisaorsini singlemetabarcodingmultiplexcapturescommunitylevelfreshwaterbiodiversityandbeyond