A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients

Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a standard prognostic biomarker for stage IV melanoma patients. Often, LDH levels do not provide real-time information about the metastatic melanoma patients’ disease status and treatment response. Therefore, there is a need to find reliable blood biomarkers for...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matias A. Bustos, Rebecca Gross, Negin Rahimzadeh, Hunter Cole, Linh T. Tran, Kevin D. Tran, Ling Takeshima, Stacey L. Stern, Steven O’Day, Dave S. B. Hoon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/11/3361
_version_ 1797548015905406976
author Matias A. Bustos
Rebecca Gross
Negin Rahimzadeh
Hunter Cole
Linh T. Tran
Kevin D. Tran
Ling Takeshima
Stacey L. Stern
Steven O’Day
Dave S. B. Hoon
author_facet Matias A. Bustos
Rebecca Gross
Negin Rahimzadeh
Hunter Cole
Linh T. Tran
Kevin D. Tran
Ling Takeshima
Stacey L. Stern
Steven O’Day
Dave S. B. Hoon
author_sort Matias A. Bustos
collection DOAJ
description Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a standard prognostic biomarker for stage IV melanoma patients. Often, LDH levels do not provide real-time information about the metastatic melanoma patients’ disease status and treatment response. Therefore, there is a need to find reliable blood biomarkers for improved monitoring of metastatic melanoma patients who are undergoing checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CII). The objective in this prospective pilot study was to discover circulating cell-free microRNA (cfmiR) signatures in the plasma that could assess melanoma patients’ responses during CII. The cfmiRs were evaluated by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) HTG EdgeSeq microRNA (miR) Whole Transcriptome Assay (WTA; 2083 miRs) in 158 plasma samples obtained before and during the course of CII from 47 AJCC stage III/IV melanoma patients’ and 73 normal donors’ plasma samples. Initially, cfmiR profiles for pre- and post-treatment plasma samples of stage IV non-responder melanoma patients were compared to normal donors’ plasma samples. Using machine learning, we identified a 9 cfmiR signature that was associated with stage IV melanoma patients being non-responsive to CII. These cfmiRs were compared in pre- and post-treatment plasma samples from stage IV melanoma patients that showed good responses. Circulating miR-4649-3p, miR-615-3p, and miR-1234-3p demonstrated potential prognostic utility in assessing CII responses. Compared to LDH levels during CII, circulating miR-615-3p levels were consistently more efficient in detecting melanoma patients undergoing CII who developed progressive disease. By combining stage III/IV patients, 92 and 17 differentially expressed cfmiRs were identified in pre-treatment plasma samples from responder and non-responder patients, respectively. In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrated cfmiRs that identified treatment responses and could allow for real-time monitoring of patients receiving CII.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T14:52:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea0c7df471a34772b232ea2824430fbf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-6694
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T14:52:24Z
publishDate 2020-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Cancers
spelling doaj.art-ea0c7df471a34772b232ea2824430fbf2023-11-20T20:52:43ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-11-011211336110.3390/cancers12113361A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma PatientsMatias A. Bustos0Rebecca Gross1Negin Rahimzadeh2Hunter Cole3Linh T. Tran4Kevin D. Tran5Ling Takeshima6Stacey L. Stern7Steven O’Day8Dave S. B. Hoon9Department of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Providence Saint John’s Health Center (SJHC), Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Providence Saint John’s Health Center (SJHC), Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Providence Saint John’s Health Center (SJHC), Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Immuno-Oncology and Clinical Research, JWCI, Providence SJHC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Genomic Sequencing Center, JWCI, Providence SJHC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Genomic Sequencing Center, JWCI, Providence SJHC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Providence Saint John’s Health Center (SJHC), Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Biostatistics, JWCI, Providence SJHC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Immuno-Oncology and Clinical Research, JWCI, Providence SJHC, Santa Monica, CA 90404, USADepartment of Translational Molecular Medicine, John Wayne Cancer Institute (JWCI), Providence Saint John’s Health Center (SJHC), Santa Monica, CA 90404, USASerum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a standard prognostic biomarker for stage IV melanoma patients. Often, LDH levels do not provide real-time information about the metastatic melanoma patients’ disease status and treatment response. Therefore, there is a need to find reliable blood biomarkers for improved monitoring of metastatic melanoma patients who are undergoing checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (CII). The objective in this prospective pilot study was to discover circulating cell-free microRNA (cfmiR) signatures in the plasma that could assess melanoma patients’ responses during CII. The cfmiRs were evaluated by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) HTG EdgeSeq microRNA (miR) Whole Transcriptome Assay (WTA; 2083 miRs) in 158 plasma samples obtained before and during the course of CII from 47 AJCC stage III/IV melanoma patients’ and 73 normal donors’ plasma samples. Initially, cfmiR profiles for pre- and post-treatment plasma samples of stage IV non-responder melanoma patients were compared to normal donors’ plasma samples. Using machine learning, we identified a 9 cfmiR signature that was associated with stage IV melanoma patients being non-responsive to CII. These cfmiRs were compared in pre- and post-treatment plasma samples from stage IV melanoma patients that showed good responses. Circulating miR-4649-3p, miR-615-3p, and miR-1234-3p demonstrated potential prognostic utility in assessing CII responses. Compared to LDH levels during CII, circulating miR-615-3p levels were consistently more efficient in detecting melanoma patients undergoing CII who developed progressive disease. By combining stage III/IV patients, 92 and 17 differentially expressed cfmiRs were identified in pre-treatment plasma samples from responder and non-responder patients, respectively. In conclusion, this pilot study demonstrated cfmiRs that identified treatment responses and could allow for real-time monitoring of patients receiving CII.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/11/3361serum LDHblood biomarkermiRNAcirculating microRNAplasmaimmunotherapy
spellingShingle Matias A. Bustos
Rebecca Gross
Negin Rahimzadeh
Hunter Cole
Linh T. Tran
Kevin D. Tran
Ling Takeshima
Stacey L. Stern
Steven O’Day
Dave S. B. Hoon
A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
Cancers
serum LDH
blood biomarker
miRNA
circulating microRNA
plasma
immunotherapy
title A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
title_full A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
title_fullStr A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
title_full_unstemmed A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
title_short A Pilot Study Comparing the Efficacy of Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels Versus Circulating Cell-Free microRNAs in Monitoring Responses to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma Patients
title_sort pilot study comparing the efficacy of lactate dehydrogenase levels versus circulating cell free micrornas in monitoring responses to checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma patients
topic serum LDH
blood biomarker
miRNA
circulating microRNA
plasma
immunotherapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/11/3361
work_keys_str_mv AT matiasabustos apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT rebeccagross apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT neginrahimzadeh apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT huntercole apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT linhttran apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT kevindtran apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT lingtakeshima apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT staceylstern apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT stevenoday apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT davesbhoon apilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT matiasabustos pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT rebeccagross pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT neginrahimzadeh pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT huntercole pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT linhttran pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT kevindtran pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT lingtakeshima pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT staceylstern pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT stevenoday pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients
AT davesbhoon pilotstudycomparingtheefficacyoflactatedehydrogenaselevelsversuscirculatingcellfreemicrornasinmonitoringresponsestocheckpointinhibitorimmunotherapyinmetastaticmelanomapatients