Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?

Antibodies have increasingly been developed as drugs with over 100 now licensed in the US or EU. During development, it is often necessary to increase or reduce the affinity of an antibody and rational attempts to do so rely on having a structure of the antibody-antigen complex often obtained by mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chu’nan Liu, Lilian M. Denzler, Oliver E.C. Hood, Andrew C.R. Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:mAbs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2322533
_version_ 1826846320173776896
author Chu’nan Liu
Lilian M. Denzler
Oliver E.C. Hood
Andrew C.R. Martin
author_facet Chu’nan Liu
Lilian M. Denzler
Oliver E.C. Hood
Andrew C.R. Martin
author_sort Chu’nan Liu
collection DOAJ
description Antibodies have increasingly been developed as drugs with over 100 now licensed in the US or EU. During development, it is often necessary to increase or reduce the affinity of an antibody and rational attempts to do so rely on having a structure of the antibody-antigen complex often obtained by modeling. The antigen-binding site consists primarily of six loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), and an open question has been whether these loops change their conformation when they bind to an antigen. Existing surveys of antibody-antigen complex structures have only examined CDR conformational change in case studies or small-scale surveys. With an increasing number of antibodies where both free and complexed structures have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, a large-scale survey of CDR conformational change during binding is now possible. To this end, we built a dataset, AbAgDb, that currently includes 177 antibodies with high-quality CDRs, each of which has at least one bound and one unbound structure. We analyzed the conformational change of the Cα backbone of each CDR upon binding and found that, in most cases, the CDRs (other than CDR-H3) show minimal movement, while 70.6% and 87% of CDR-H3s showed global Cα RMSD ≤ 1.0Å and ≤ 2.0Å, respectively. We also compared bound CDR conformations with the conformational space of unbound CDRs and found most of the bound conformations are included in the unbound conformational space. In future, our results will contribute to developing insights into antibodies and new methods for modeling and docking.
first_indexed 2024-04-25T00:11:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea0ff2b1ed564d10a991b78706b3b6b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1942-0862
1942-0870
language English
last_indexed 2025-02-16T15:00:24Z
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series mAbs
spelling doaj.art-ea0ff2b1ed564d10a991b78706b3b6b92025-01-31T04:19:38ZengTaylor & Francis GroupmAbs1942-08621942-08702024-12-0116110.1080/19420862.2024.2322533Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?Chu’nan Liu0Lilian M. Denzler1Oliver E.C. Hood2Andrew C.R. Martin3Structural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UKStructural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UKStructural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UKStructural and Molecular Biology, Division of Biosciences, University College London, London, UKAntibodies have increasingly been developed as drugs with over 100 now licensed in the US or EU. During development, it is often necessary to increase or reduce the affinity of an antibody and rational attempts to do so rely on having a structure of the antibody-antigen complex often obtained by modeling. The antigen-binding site consists primarily of six loops known as complementarity-determining regions (CDRs), and an open question has been whether these loops change their conformation when they bind to an antigen. Existing surveys of antibody-antigen complex structures have only examined CDR conformational change in case studies or small-scale surveys. With an increasing number of antibodies where both free and complexed structures have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank, a large-scale survey of CDR conformational change during binding is now possible. To this end, we built a dataset, AbAgDb, that currently includes 177 antibodies with high-quality CDRs, each of which has at least one bound and one unbound structure. We analyzed the conformational change of the Cα backbone of each CDR upon binding and found that, in most cases, the CDRs (other than CDR-H3) show minimal movement, while 70.6% and 87% of CDR-H3s showed global Cα RMSD ≤ 1.0Å and ≤ 2.0Å, respectively. We also compared bound CDR conformations with the conformational space of unbound CDRs and found most of the bound conformations are included in the unbound conformational space. In future, our results will contribute to developing insights into antibodies and new methods for modeling and docking.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2322533antibodiesantibody structurecomplementarity determining regionsCDRsCDR flexibilityantibody binding
spellingShingle Chu’nan Liu
Lilian M. Denzler
Oliver E.C. Hood
Andrew C.R. Martin
Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
mAbs
antibodies
antibody structure
complementarity determining regions
CDRs
CDR flexibility
antibody binding
title Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
title_full Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
title_fullStr Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
title_full_unstemmed Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
title_short Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding?
title_sort do antibody cdr loops change conformation upon binding
topic antibodies
antibody structure
complementarity determining regions
CDRs
CDR flexibility
antibody binding
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/19420862.2024.2322533
work_keys_str_mv AT chunanliu doantibodycdrloopschangeconformationuponbinding
AT lilianmdenzler doantibodycdrloopschangeconformationuponbinding
AT oliverechood doantibodycdrloopschangeconformationuponbinding
AT andrewcrmartin doantibodycdrloopschangeconformationuponbinding