Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study

The human brain is tuned to recognize emotional facial expressions in faces having a natural upright orientation. The relative contributions of featural, configural, and holistic processing to decision-making are as yet poorly understood. This study used a diffusion decision model (DDM) of decision-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu-Fang Yang, Eric Brunet-Gouet, Mariana Burca, Emmanuel K. Kalunga, Michel-Ange Amorim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00340/full
_version_ 1819319797771403264
author Yu-Fang Yang
Yu-Fang Yang
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Mariana Burca
Mariana Burca
Emmanuel K. Kalunga
Michel-Ange Amorim
Michel-Ange Amorim
author_facet Yu-Fang Yang
Yu-Fang Yang
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Mariana Burca
Mariana Burca
Emmanuel K. Kalunga
Michel-Ange Amorim
Michel-Ange Amorim
author_sort Yu-Fang Yang
collection DOAJ
description The human brain is tuned to recognize emotional facial expressions in faces having a natural upright orientation. The relative contributions of featural, configural, and holistic processing to decision-making are as yet poorly understood. This study used a diffusion decision model (DDM) of decision-making to investigate the contribution of early face-sensitive processes to emotion recognition from physiognomic features (the eyes, nose, and mouth) by determining how experimental conditions tapping those processes affect early face-sensitive neuroelectric reflections (P100, N170, and P250) of processes determining evidence accumulation at the behavioral level. We first examined the effects of both stimulus orientation (upright vs. inverted) and stimulus type (photographs vs. sketches) on behavior and neuroelectric components (amplitude and latency). Then, we explored the sources of variance common to the experimental effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) and the DDM parameters. Several results suggest that the N170 indicates core visual processing for emotion recognition decision-making: (a) the additive effect of stimulus inversion and impoverishment on N170 latency; and (b) multivariate analysis suggesting that N170 neuroelectric activity must be increased to counteract the detrimental effects of face inversion on drift rate and of stimulus impoverishment on the stimulus encoding component of non-decision times. Overall, our results show that emotion recognition is still possible even with degraded stimulation, but at a neurocognitive cost, reflecting the extent to which our brain struggles to accumulate sensory evidence of a given emotion. Accordingly, we theorize that: (a) the P100 neural generator would provide a holistic frame of reference to the face percept through categorical encoding; (b) the N170 neural generator would maintain the structural cohesiveness of the subtle configural variations in facial expressions across our experimental manipulations through coordinate encoding of the facial features; and (c) building on the previous configural processing, the neurons generating the P250 would be responsible for a normalization process adapting to the facial features to match the stimulus to internal representations of emotional expressions.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T11:09:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea16e52d8a734c74958c944127d1bdcd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T11:09:24Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-ea16e52d8a734c74958c944127d1bdcd2022-12-21T16:58:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612020-09-011410.3389/fnhum.2020.00340542109Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP StudyYu-Fang Yang0Yu-Fang Yang1Eric Brunet-Gouet2Eric Brunet-Gouet3Mariana Burca4Mariana Burca5Emmanuel K. Kalunga6Michel-Ange Amorim7Michel-Ange Amorim8CIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, FranceCIAMS, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, FranceCentre Hospitalier de Versailles, Hôpital Mignot, Le Chesnay, FranceCESP, DevPsy, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, Villejuif, FranceCentre Hospitalier de Versailles, Hôpital Mignot, Le Chesnay, FranceCESP, DevPsy, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, Villejuif, FranceUVSQ, LISV, Université Paris-Saclay, Velizy, FranceCIAMS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, FranceCIAMS, Université d’Orléans, Orléans, FranceThe human brain is tuned to recognize emotional facial expressions in faces having a natural upright orientation. The relative contributions of featural, configural, and holistic processing to decision-making are as yet poorly understood. This study used a diffusion decision model (DDM) of decision-making to investigate the contribution of early face-sensitive processes to emotion recognition from physiognomic features (the eyes, nose, and mouth) by determining how experimental conditions tapping those processes affect early face-sensitive neuroelectric reflections (P100, N170, and P250) of processes determining evidence accumulation at the behavioral level. We first examined the effects of both stimulus orientation (upright vs. inverted) and stimulus type (photographs vs. sketches) on behavior and neuroelectric components (amplitude and latency). Then, we explored the sources of variance common to the experimental effects on event-related potentials (ERPs) and the DDM parameters. Several results suggest that the N170 indicates core visual processing for emotion recognition decision-making: (a) the additive effect of stimulus inversion and impoverishment on N170 latency; and (b) multivariate analysis suggesting that N170 neuroelectric activity must be increased to counteract the detrimental effects of face inversion on drift rate and of stimulus impoverishment on the stimulus encoding component of non-decision times. Overall, our results show that emotion recognition is still possible even with degraded stimulation, but at a neurocognitive cost, reflecting the extent to which our brain struggles to accumulate sensory evidence of a given emotion. Accordingly, we theorize that: (a) the P100 neural generator would provide a holistic frame of reference to the face percept through categorical encoding; (b) the N170 neural generator would maintain the structural cohesiveness of the subtle configural variations in facial expressions across our experimental manipulations through coordinate encoding of the facial features; and (c) building on the previous configural processing, the neurons generating the P250 would be responsible for a normalization process adapting to the facial features to match the stimulus to internal representations of emotional expressions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00340/fullP100N170P250physiognomic featuresdiffusion decision modelemotional facial expression
spellingShingle Yu-Fang Yang
Yu-Fang Yang
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Eric Brunet-Gouet
Mariana Burca
Mariana Burca
Emmanuel K. Kalunga
Michel-Ange Amorim
Michel-Ange Amorim
Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
P100
N170
P250
physiognomic features
diffusion decision model
emotional facial expression
title Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
title_full Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
title_fullStr Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
title_full_unstemmed Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
title_short Brain Processes While Struggling With Evidence Accumulation During Facial Emotion Recognition: An ERP Study
title_sort brain processes while struggling with evidence accumulation during facial emotion recognition an erp study
topic P100
N170
P250
physiognomic features
diffusion decision model
emotional facial expression
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00340/full
work_keys_str_mv AT yufangyang brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT yufangyang brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT ericbrunetgouet brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT ericbrunetgouet brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT marianaburca brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT marianaburca brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT emmanuelkkalunga brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT michelangeamorim brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy
AT michelangeamorim brainprocesseswhilestrugglingwithevidenceaccumulationduringfacialemotionrecognitionanerpstudy