Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?

The Rietveld-internal standard method for Bragg-Brentano reflection geometry (θ/2θ) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns is implemented to determine the amorphous phase content. The effect of some minor phases on quantitative accuracy is assessed. The numerical simulation analysis of errors and the rela...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Piqi Zhao, Lingchao Lu, Xianping Liu, Angeles G. De la Torre, Xin Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Crystals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/8/3/110
_version_ 1828153780794818560
author Piqi Zhao
Lingchao Lu
Xianping Liu
Angeles G. De la Torre
Xin Cheng
author_facet Piqi Zhao
Lingchao Lu
Xianping Liu
Angeles G. De la Torre
Xin Cheng
author_sort Piqi Zhao
collection DOAJ
description The Rietveld-internal standard method for Bragg-Brentano reflection geometry (θ/2θ) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns is implemented to determine the amorphous phase content. The effect of some minor phases on quantitative accuracy is assessed. The numerical simulation analysis of errors and the related corrections are discussed. The results reveal that high purity of crystalline phases in the standard must be strictly ensured. The minor amorphous or non-quantified crystalline phases exert significant effect on the quantitative accuracy, even with less than 2 wt% if ignored. The error levels are evaluated by numerical simulation analysis and the corresponding error-accepted zone is suggested. To eliminate such error, a corrected equation is proposed. When the adding standard happens to be present in sample, it should be also carefully dealt with even in low amounts. Based on that ignorance, the absolute and relative error equations (ΔAE, ΔRE) are derived, as proposed. The conditions for high quantitative accuracy of original equation is strictly satisfied with a lower amount of standard phase present in sample, less than 2 wt%, and a higher dosage of internal standard, larger than 20 wt%. The corrected equation to eliminate such quantitative error is suggested.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T22:30:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea18c104b5a04d218fa00762f3dbf5c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4352
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T22:30:40Z
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Crystals
spelling doaj.art-ea18c104b5a04d218fa00762f3dbf5c92022-12-22T03:59:28ZengMDPI AGCrystals2073-43522018-02-018311010.3390/cryst8030110cryst8030110Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?Piqi Zhao0Lingchao Lu1Xianping Liu2Angeles G. De la Torre3Xin Cheng4Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Preparation and Measurement of Building Materials, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, ChinaShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Preparation and Measurement of Building Materials, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, ChinaSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, ChinaDepartamento de Química Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, SpainShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Preparation and Measurement of Building Materials, University of Jinan, Jinan 250022, ChinaThe Rietveld-internal standard method for Bragg-Brentano reflection geometry (θ/2θ) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns is implemented to determine the amorphous phase content. The effect of some minor phases on quantitative accuracy is assessed. The numerical simulation analysis of errors and the related corrections are discussed. The results reveal that high purity of crystalline phases in the standard must be strictly ensured. The minor amorphous or non-quantified crystalline phases exert significant effect on the quantitative accuracy, even with less than 2 wt% if ignored. The error levels are evaluated by numerical simulation analysis and the corresponding error-accepted zone is suggested. To eliminate such error, a corrected equation is proposed. When the adding standard happens to be present in sample, it should be also carefully dealt with even in low amounts. Based on that ignorance, the absolute and relative error equations (ΔAE, ΔRE) are derived, as proposed. The conditions for high quantitative accuracy of original equation is strictly satisfied with a lower amount of standard phase present in sample, less than 2 wt%, and a higher dosage of internal standard, larger than 20 wt%. The corrected equation to eliminate such quantitative error is suggested.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/8/3/110Rietveldquantitative analysiscorrected equationamorphous
spellingShingle Piqi Zhao
Lingchao Lu
Xianping Liu
Angeles G. De la Torre
Xin Cheng
Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
Crystals
Rietveld
quantitative analysis
corrected equation
amorphous
title Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
title_full Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
title_fullStr Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
title_full_unstemmed Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
title_short Error Analysis and Correction for Quantitative Phase Analysis Based on Rietveld-Internal Standard Method: Whether the Minor Phases Can Be Ignored?
title_sort error analysis and correction for quantitative phase analysis based on rietveld internal standard method whether the minor phases can be ignored
topic Rietveld
quantitative analysis
corrected equation
amorphous
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4352/8/3/110
work_keys_str_mv AT piqizhao erroranalysisandcorrectionforquantitativephaseanalysisbasedonrietveldinternalstandardmethodwhethertheminorphasescanbeignored
AT lingchaolu erroranalysisandcorrectionforquantitativephaseanalysisbasedonrietveldinternalstandardmethodwhethertheminorphasescanbeignored
AT xianpingliu erroranalysisandcorrectionforquantitativephaseanalysisbasedonrietveldinternalstandardmethodwhethertheminorphasescanbeignored
AT angelesgdelatorre erroranalysisandcorrectionforquantitativephaseanalysisbasedonrietveldinternalstandardmethodwhethertheminorphasescanbeignored
AT xincheng erroranalysisandcorrectionforquantitativephaseanalysisbasedonrietveldinternalstandardmethodwhethertheminorphasescanbeignored