Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures

Abstract Background Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Filip C. Dolatowski, Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-x
_version_ 1798034546986319872
author Filip C. Dolatowski
Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
author_facet Filip C. Dolatowski
Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
author_sort Filip C. Dolatowski
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over internal fixation for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20°. However, the reliability of the method used to measure the posterior tilt has not been assessed according to recommended standards for reliability trials. Methods Four orthopedic registrars and four consultants measured the posterior tilt angle in 50 preoperative lateral radiographs at two occasions six weeks apart. We estimated inter- and intrarater reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We also assessed repeatability by the repeatability coefficient (RC) and agreement by the minimal detectable change (MDC). Based on the suggested cutoff value of 20°, we reported the overall percentage and specific agreement for the choice of implant. Results Inter- and intrarater reliability for all raters was excellent with an ICC (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.85) and 0.77 (0.67–0.86), respectively. The RC was 13.9 and the MDC 14.1. Specific agreement for choosing arthroplasty was 61.3 and 54.6% for the first and second test occasion, respectively. Conclusions Eight orthopedic surgeons measured the posterior tilt in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and achieved excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. However, variations in repeated measurements and variations in measurements made by different raters, as assessed by the RC and the MDC respectively, ranged from 13.9° to 14.1°. The variations in posterior tilt measurements should be taken into account when choosing the type of implant for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea26390955b548dda1da7240b319f5b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1749-799X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:46Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj.art-ea26390955b548dda1da7240b319f5b92022-12-22T04:04:02ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2017-09-011211710.1186/s13018-017-0632-xEight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fracturesFilip C. Dolatowski0Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken1Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of OsloDepartment of Orthopedic and Rheumatic surgery, Kongsvinger HospitalAbstract Background Studies of elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures (FNFs) suggest that a preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head of at least 20° increases the risk of fixation failure. A recently published treatment algorithm recommended hemiarthroplasty over internal fixation for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and a preoperative posterior tilt of at least 20°. However, the reliability of the method used to measure the posterior tilt has not been assessed according to recommended standards for reliability trials. Methods Four orthopedic registrars and four consultants measured the posterior tilt angle in 50 preoperative lateral radiographs at two occasions six weeks apart. We estimated inter- and intrarater reliability by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We also assessed repeatability by the repeatability coefficient (RC) and agreement by the minimal detectable change (MDC). Based on the suggested cutoff value of 20°, we reported the overall percentage and specific agreement for the choice of implant. Results Inter- and intrarater reliability for all raters was excellent with an ICC (95% CI) of 0.77 (0.69–0.85) and 0.77 (0.67–0.86), respectively. The RC was 13.9 and the MDC 14.1. Specific agreement for choosing arthroplasty was 61.3 and 54.6% for the first and second test occasion, respectively. Conclusions Eight orthopedic surgeons measured the posterior tilt in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II FNFs and achieved excellent inter- and intrarater reliability. However, variations in repeated measurements and variations in measurements made by different raters, as assessed by the RC and the MDC respectively, ranged from 13.9° to 14.1°. The variations in posterior tilt measurements should be taken into account when choosing the type of implant for elderly patients with Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-xFemoral neck fractureGarden-I and Garden-IIPosterior tiltReliabilityAgreementMinimal detectable change
spellingShingle Filip C. Dolatowski
Sigurd Erik Hoelsbrekken
Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Femoral neck fracture
Garden-I and Garden-II
Posterior tilt
Reliability
Agreement
Minimal detectable change
title Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_full Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_fullStr Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_full_unstemmed Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_short Eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 Garden-I and Garden-II femoral neck fractures
title_sort eight orthopedic surgeons achieved moderate to excellent reliability measuring the preoperative posterior tilt angle in 50 garden i and garden ii femoral neck fractures
topic Femoral neck fracture
Garden-I and Garden-II
Posterior tilt
Reliability
Agreement
Minimal detectable change
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13018-017-0632-x
work_keys_str_mv AT filipcdolatowski eightorthopedicsurgeonsachievedmoderatetoexcellentreliabilitymeasuringthepreoperativeposteriortiltanglein50gardeniandgardeniifemoralneckfractures
AT sigurderikhoelsbrekken eightorthopedicsurgeonsachievedmoderatetoexcellentreliabilitymeasuringthepreoperativeposteriortiltanglein50gardeniandgardeniifemoralneckfractures