Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches

To assess the effect of anthropogenic activities on ecosystems, it is of prime importance to develop new tools enabling a rapid characterization of ecological communities. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly impacted and threatened by human activities and need thorough attention to preserve their...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen Mulero, Eve Toulza, Anaïs Loisier, Meryl Zimmerman, Jean-François Allienne, Joséphine Foata, Yann Quilichini, Jean-Pierre Pointier, Olivier Rey, Jérôme Boissier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Global Ecology and Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420309707
_version_ 1818920229448712192
author Stephen Mulero
Eve Toulza
Anaïs Loisier
Meryl Zimmerman
Jean-François Allienne
Joséphine Foata
Yann Quilichini
Jean-Pierre Pointier
Olivier Rey
Jérôme Boissier
author_facet Stephen Mulero
Eve Toulza
Anaïs Loisier
Meryl Zimmerman
Jean-François Allienne
Joséphine Foata
Yann Quilichini
Jean-Pierre Pointier
Olivier Rey
Jérôme Boissier
author_sort Stephen Mulero
collection DOAJ
description To assess the effect of anthropogenic activities on ecosystems, it is of prime importance to develop new tools enabling a rapid characterization of ecological communities. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly impacted and threatened by human activities and need thorough attention to preserve their biodiversity and the ecological services they provide. Studying such ecosystems is generally difficult because the associated organisms are hard to sample and to monitor. We present a ready-to-use environmental metabarcoding protocol to characterize and monitor the freshwater gastropods communities from water samples. The efficiency of this new tool was compared to a classical malacological survey at 19 sampled sites from 10 distinct rivers distributed over Corsica Island (France). From a single water sample, our eDNA monitoring tool provided a faithful characterization of the local malacofauna compared to the results obtained from the classical malacological survey, with 97.1% of species detection confirmed by both methods. The present tool successfully detected the 11 freshwater snail species previously reported in Corsica by malacological survey but was limited at the genus level for some species. Moreover, our malacological survey allowed an update of the local distribution of a wide diversity of freshwater snails including invasive species (i.e. Potamopyrgus antipodarum and Physa acuta) as well as snail hosts of pathogens of medical and veterinary importance (i.e. Bulinus truncatus and Galba truncatula). These results strengthened a previous hypothesis of an eventual competitive interaction between B. truncatus and P. antipodarum that could limit the endemization of the uro-genital bilharziasis in Corsica.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:18:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea2b977aad4a40d6a3ff3eeb62824b10
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2351-9894
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:18:26Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Global Ecology and Conservation
spelling doaj.art-ea2b977aad4a40d6a3ff3eeb62824b102022-12-21T19:58:31ZengElsevierGlobal Ecology and Conservation2351-98942021-01-0125e01428Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approachesStephen Mulero0Eve Toulza1Anaïs Loisier2Meryl Zimmerman3Jean-François Allienne4Joséphine Foata5Yann Quilichini6Jean-Pierre Pointier7Olivier Rey8Jérôme Boissier9University of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, France; Corresponding author. Université de Perpignan Via Domitia, 52 Avenue Paul Alduy, 66860, Perpignan cedex 9, France.University of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUniversity of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUniversity of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUniversity of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUMR SPE 6134, CNRS – Università di Corsica Pascal Paoli, 20250, Corte, Corsica, FranceUMR SPE 6134, CNRS – Università di Corsica Pascal Paoli, 20250, Corte, Corsica, FrancePSL University, USR3278 CRIOBE EPHE-CNRS-UPVD, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUniversity of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceUniversity of Perpignan, IHPE UMR 5244, CNRS, IFREMER, Univ. Montpellier, F-66860, Perpignan, FranceTo assess the effect of anthropogenic activities on ecosystems, it is of prime importance to develop new tools enabling a rapid characterization of ecological communities. Freshwater ecosystems are particularly impacted and threatened by human activities and need thorough attention to preserve their biodiversity and the ecological services they provide. Studying such ecosystems is generally difficult because the associated organisms are hard to sample and to monitor. We present a ready-to-use environmental metabarcoding protocol to characterize and monitor the freshwater gastropods communities from water samples. The efficiency of this new tool was compared to a classical malacological survey at 19 sampled sites from 10 distinct rivers distributed over Corsica Island (France). From a single water sample, our eDNA monitoring tool provided a faithful characterization of the local malacofauna compared to the results obtained from the classical malacological survey, with 97.1% of species detection confirmed by both methods. The present tool successfully detected the 11 freshwater snail species previously reported in Corsica by malacological survey but was limited at the genus level for some species. Moreover, our malacological survey allowed an update of the local distribution of a wide diversity of freshwater snails including invasive species (i.e. Potamopyrgus antipodarum and Physa acuta) as well as snail hosts of pathogens of medical and veterinary importance (i.e. Bulinus truncatus and Galba truncatula). These results strengthened a previous hypothesis of an eventual competitive interaction between B. truncatus and P. antipodarum that could limit the endemization of the uro-genital bilharziasis in Corsica.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420309707BiomonitoringCorsicaEnvironmental DNAMalacologyMetabarcodingSnail communities
spellingShingle Stephen Mulero
Eve Toulza
Anaïs Loisier
Meryl Zimmerman
Jean-François Allienne
Joséphine Foata
Yann Quilichini
Jean-Pierre Pointier
Olivier Rey
Jérôme Boissier
Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
Global Ecology and Conservation
Biomonitoring
Corsica
Environmental DNA
Malacology
Metabarcoding
Snail communities
title Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
title_full Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
title_fullStr Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
title_full_unstemmed Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
title_short Malacological survey in a bottle of water: A comparative study between manual sampling and environmental DNA metabarcoding approaches
title_sort malacological survey in a bottle of water a comparative study between manual sampling and environmental dna metabarcoding approaches
topic Biomonitoring
Corsica
Environmental DNA
Malacology
Metabarcoding
Snail communities
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989420309707
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenmulero malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT evetoulza malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT anaisloisier malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT merylzimmerman malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT jeanfrancoisallienne malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT josephinefoata malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT yannquilichini malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT jeanpierrepointier malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT olivierrey malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches
AT jeromeboissier malacologicalsurveyinabottleofwateracomparativestudybetweenmanualsamplingandenvironmentaldnametabarcodingapproaches