Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. Pecoraro, M. Deuker, G. Rosiello, F. Stolzenbach, S. Luzzago, Z. Tian, S.F. Shariat, F. Saad, A. Briganti, C. Fiori, F. Porpiglia, P.I. Karakiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-10-01
Series:European Urology Open Science
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872
_version_ 1818596921720176640
author A. Pecoraro
M. Deuker
G. Rosiello
F. Stolzenbach
S. Luzzago
Z. Tian
S.F. Shariat
F. Saad
A. Briganti
C. Fiori
F. Porpiglia
P.I. Karakiewicz
author_facet A. Pecoraro
M. Deuker
G. Rosiello
F. Stolzenbach
S. Luzzago
Z. Tian
S.F. Shariat
F. Saad
A. Briganti
C. Fiori
F. Porpiglia
P.I. Karakiewicz
author_sort A. Pecoraro
collection DOAJ
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:39:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea446d4456e24d05a658619110792831
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-1683
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:39:36Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series European Urology Open Science
spelling doaj.art-ea446d4456e24d05a6586191107928312022-12-21T22:32:58ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832020-10-0120S110S111Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based studyA. PecoraroM. DeukerG. RosielloF. StolzenbachS. LuzzagoZ. TianS.F. ShariatF. SaadA. BrigantiC. FioriF. PorpigliaP.I. Karakiewiczhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872
spellingShingle A. Pecoraro
M. Deuker
G. Rosiello
F. Stolzenbach
S. Luzzago
Z. Tian
S.F. Shariat
F. Saad
A. Briganti
C. Fiori
F. Porpiglia
P.I. Karakiewicz
Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
European Urology Open Science
title Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
title_full Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
title_fullStr Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
title_short Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
title_sort comparison between small renal masses 0 2cm vs 2 1 4 cm in size a population based study
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872
work_keys_str_mv AT apecoraro comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT mdeuker comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT grosiello comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT fstolzenbach comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT sluzzago comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT ztian comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT sfshariat comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT fsaad comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT abriganti comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT cfiori comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT fporpiglia comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy
AT pikarakiewicz comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy