Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2020-10-01
|
Series: | European Urology Open Science |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872 |
_version_ | 1818596921720176640 |
---|---|
author | A. Pecoraro M. Deuker G. Rosiello F. Stolzenbach S. Luzzago Z. Tian S.F. Shariat F. Saad A. Briganti C. Fiori F. Porpiglia P.I. Karakiewicz |
author_facet | A. Pecoraro M. Deuker G. Rosiello F. Stolzenbach S. Luzzago Z. Tian S.F. Shariat F. Saad A. Briganti C. Fiori F. Porpiglia P.I. Karakiewicz |
author_sort | A. Pecoraro |
collection | DOAJ |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T11:39:36Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ea446d4456e24d05a658619110792831 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2666-1683 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T11:39:36Z |
publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | European Urology Open Science |
spelling | doaj.art-ea446d4456e24d05a6586191107928312022-12-21T22:32:58ZengElsevierEuropean Urology Open Science2666-16832020-10-0120S110S111Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based studyA. PecoraroM. DeukerG. RosielloF. StolzenbachS. LuzzagoZ. TianS.F. ShariatF. SaadA. BrigantiC. FioriF. PorpigliaP.I. Karakiewiczhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872 |
spellingShingle | A. Pecoraro M. Deuker G. Rosiello F. Stolzenbach S. Luzzago Z. Tian S.F. Shariat F. Saad A. Briganti C. Fiori F. Porpiglia P.I. Karakiewicz Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study European Urology Open Science |
title | Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study |
title_full | Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study |
title_short | Comparison between small renal masses 0–2cm vs. 2.1–4 cm in size: a population-based study |
title_sort | comparison between small renal masses 0 2cm vs 2 1 4 cm in size a population based study |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168320354872 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT apecoraro comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT mdeuker comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT grosiello comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT fstolzenbach comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT sluzzago comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT ztian comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT sfshariat comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT fsaad comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT abriganti comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT cfiori comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT fporpiglia comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy AT pikarakiewicz comparisonbetweensmallrenalmasses02cmvs214cminsizeapopulationbasedstudy |