Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration

Abstract Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell‐free scaffolds, which provide a three‐dimensional support fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizaveta Kon, Giuseppe Filardo, Francesco Perdisa, Giulia Venieri, Maurilio Marcacci
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0
_version_ 1797321395188793344
author Elizaveta Kon
Giuseppe Filardo
Francesco Perdisa
Giulia Venieri
Maurilio Marcacci
author_facet Elizaveta Kon
Giuseppe Filardo
Francesco Perdisa
Giulia Venieri
Maurilio Marcacci
author_sort Elizaveta Kon
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell‐free scaffolds, which provide a three‐dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi‐layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three‐layered collagen‐hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid‐term follow‐up. The second is a PLGA‐calcium‐sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short‐term outcomes of limited case‐series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite‐based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in‐depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high‐level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T04:57:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea4f7beb94d245dd9251092cfb3bec20
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2197-1153
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T04:57:58Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
spelling doaj.art-ea4f7beb94d245dd9251092cfb3bec202024-02-07T15:00:45ZengWileyJournal of Experimental Orthopaedics2197-11532014-01-0111n/an/a10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regenerationElizaveta Kon0Giuseppe Filardo1Francesco Perdisa2Giulia Venieri3Maurilio Marcacci4Nano‐Biotechnology LaboratoryRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteVia di Barbiano n. 1/1040136BolognaItalyNano‐Biotechnology LaboratoryRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteVia di Barbiano n. 1/1040136BolognaItalyBiomechanics LaboratoryRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteVia di Barbiano n. 1/1040136BolognaItalyBiomechanics LaboratoryRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteVia di Barbiano n. 1/1040136BolognaItalyBiomechanics LaboratoryRizzoli Orthopaedic InstituteVia di Barbiano n. 1/1040136BolognaItalyAbstract Several techniques have been used during the years to treat chondral and osteochondral lesions. Among them, the emerging trend in the field of osteochondral regeneration is to treat the entire osteochondral unit by implanting cell‐free scaffolds, which provide a three‐dimensional support for the cell growth and may act themselves as stimuli for an “in situ” tissue regeneration. Various multi‐layered products have been proposed that mimic both the subchondral bone and the cartilaginous layer. Among these, three have currently been reported in the literature. One has been widely investigated: it is a nanocomposite three‐layered collagen‐hydroxyapatite scaffold, which is showing promising results clinically and by MRI even at mid‐term follow‐up. The second is a PLGA‐calcium‐sulfate bilayer scaffold: however, the literature findings are still controversial and only short‐term outcomes of limited case‐series have been published. The most recent one is a solid aragonite‐based scaffold, which seems to give promising clinical and MRI outcomes, even if the literature is still lacking more in‐depth evaluations. Even though the Literature related to this topic is quickly increasing in number, the clinical evidence it is still limited to some case series, and high‐level studies are needed to better demonstrate their real effectiveness.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0
spellingShingle Elizaveta Kon
Giuseppe Filardo
Francesco Perdisa
Giulia Venieri
Maurilio Marcacci
Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
title Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_full Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_fullStr Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_full_unstemmed Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_short Clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
title_sort clinical results of multilayered biomaterials for osteochondral regeneration
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-014-0010-0
work_keys_str_mv AT elizavetakon clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT giuseppefilardo clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT francescoperdisa clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT giuliavenieri clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration
AT mauriliomarcacci clinicalresultsofmultilayeredbiomaterialsforosteochondralregeneration