Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring

The objective of this paper is to develop an optimized system to detect Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in compressively sensed electrocardiogram (ECG) for long-term remote patient monitoring. A three-stage system was developed to 1) reject ECG of poor signal quality, 2) detect AF in compressively sensed E...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed Abdelazez, Sreeraman Rajan, Adrian D. C. Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Electronics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/felec.2022.906689/full
_version_ 1811318767019360256
author Mohamed Abdelazez
Sreeraman Rajan
Adrian D. C. Chan
author_facet Mohamed Abdelazez
Sreeraman Rajan
Adrian D. C. Chan
author_sort Mohamed Abdelazez
collection DOAJ
description The objective of this paper is to develop an optimized system to detect Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in compressively sensed electrocardiogram (ECG) for long-term remote patient monitoring. A three-stage system was developed to 1) reject ECG of poor signal quality, 2) detect AF in compressively sensed ECG, and 3) detect AF in selectively reconstructed ECG. The Long-Term AF Database (LTAFDB), sampled at 128 Hz using a 12-bit ADC with a range of 20 mV, was used to validate the system. The LTAFDB had 83,315 normal and 82,435 AF rhythm 30 s ECG segments. Clean ECG from the LTAFDB was artificially contaminated with motion artifact to achieve −12 to 12 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in steps of 3 dB. The contaminated ECG was compressively sensed at 50% and 75% compression ratio (CR). The system was evaluated using average precision (AP), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic curve, and the F1 score. The system was optimized to maximize the AP and minimize ECG rejection and reconstruction ratios. The optimized system for 50% CR had 0.72 AP, 0.63 AUC, and 0.58 F1 score, 0.38 rejection ratio, and 0.38 reconstruction ratio. The optimized system for 75% CR had 0.72 AP, 0.63 AUC, and 0.59 F1 score, 0.40 rejection ratio, and 0.35 reconstruction ratio. Challenges for long-term AF monitoring are the short battery life of monitors and the high false alarm rate due to artifacts. The proposed system improves the short battery life through compressive sensing while reducing false alarms (high AP) and ECG reconstruction (low reconstruction ratio).
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:31:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea77a697228a4877bf3135496cb32a6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-5857
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:31:13Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Electronics
spelling doaj.art-ea77a697228a4877bf3135496cb32a6f2022-12-22T02:46:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Electronics2673-58572022-07-01310.3389/felec.2022.906689906689Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote MonitoringMohamed AbdelazezSreeraman RajanAdrian D. C. ChanThe objective of this paper is to develop an optimized system to detect Atrial Fibrillation (AF) in compressively sensed electrocardiogram (ECG) for long-term remote patient monitoring. A three-stage system was developed to 1) reject ECG of poor signal quality, 2) detect AF in compressively sensed ECG, and 3) detect AF in selectively reconstructed ECG. The Long-Term AF Database (LTAFDB), sampled at 128 Hz using a 12-bit ADC with a range of 20 mV, was used to validate the system. The LTAFDB had 83,315 normal and 82,435 AF rhythm 30 s ECG segments. Clean ECG from the LTAFDB was artificially contaminated with motion artifact to achieve −12 to 12 dB Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) in steps of 3 dB. The contaminated ECG was compressively sensed at 50% and 75% compression ratio (CR). The system was evaluated using average precision (AP), the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic curve, and the F1 score. The system was optimized to maximize the AP and minimize ECG rejection and reconstruction ratios. The optimized system for 50% CR had 0.72 AP, 0.63 AUC, and 0.58 F1 score, 0.38 rejection ratio, and 0.38 reconstruction ratio. The optimized system for 75% CR had 0.72 AP, 0.63 AUC, and 0.59 F1 score, 0.40 rejection ratio, and 0.35 reconstruction ratio. Challenges for long-term AF monitoring are the short battery life of monitors and the high false alarm rate due to artifacts. The proposed system improves the short battery life through compressive sensing while reducing false alarms (high AP) and ECG reconstruction (low reconstruction ratio).https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/felec.2022.906689/fullsignal quality assessmentremote healthcarecompressive sensingelectrocardiogrammachine learningatrial fibrillation
spellingShingle Mohamed Abdelazez
Sreeraman Rajan
Adrian D. C. Chan
Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
Frontiers in Electronics
signal quality assessment
remote healthcare
compressive sensing
electrocardiogram
machine learning
atrial fibrillation
title Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
title_full Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
title_fullStr Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
title_short Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Compressively Sensed Electrocardiogram for Remote Monitoring
title_sort detection of atrial fibrillation in compressively sensed electrocardiogram for remote monitoring
topic signal quality assessment
remote healthcare
compressive sensing
electrocardiogram
machine learning
atrial fibrillation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/felec.2022.906689/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedabdelazez detectionofatrialfibrillationincompressivelysensedelectrocardiogramforremotemonitoring
AT sreeramanrajan detectionofatrialfibrillationincompressivelysensedelectrocardiogramforremotemonitoring
AT adriandcchan detectionofatrialfibrillationincompressivelysensedelectrocardiogramforremotemonitoring