Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review

Abstract Background While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah E.P. Munce, Laure Perrier, Saeha Shin, Chamila Adhihetty, Kristen Pitzul, Michelle L.A. Nelson, Mark T. Bayley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-09-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3
_version_ 1818778359040049152
author Sarah E.P. Munce
Laure Perrier
Saeha Shin
Chamila Adhihetty
Kristen Pitzul
Michelle L.A. Nelson
Mark T. Bayley
author_facet Sarah E.P. Munce
Laure Perrier
Saeha Shin
Chamila Adhihetty
Kristen Pitzul
Michelle L.A. Nelson
Mark T. Bayley
author_sort Sarah E.P. Munce
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outlines a systematic review protocol on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life as well as physical and psychological well-being of individuals with stroke. Methods MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Only randomized controlled trials that report on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life outcomes in people with stroke will be included. The secondary outcomes will be physical and psychological well-being. Quality improvement strategies include audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement. Studies published since 2000 will be included to increase the relevancy of findings. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (i.e., health system, health care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variables, such as etiology of stroke or by sex. Discussion This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life of individuals with stroke. Improving awareness and utilization of such strategies may enhance uptake of stroke best practices and reduce inappropriate health care utilization costs. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42017064141
first_indexed 2024-12-18T11:43:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea8d7f8d86764094bd3f70b3903055dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T11:43:28Z
publishDate 2017-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-ea8d7f8d86764094bd3f70b3903055dc2022-12-21T21:09:22ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532017-09-01611410.1186/s13643-017-0579-3Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic reviewSarah E.P. Munce0Laure Perrier1Saeha Shin2Chamila Adhihetty3Kristen Pitzul4Michelle L.A. Nelson5Mark T. Bayley6Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of TorontoUniversity of Toronto, Gerstein Science Information CentreDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of TorontoBrain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network, University of TorontoAbstract Background While many outcomes post-stroke (e.g., depression) have been previously investigated, there is no complete data on the impact of a variety of quality improvement strategies on the quality of life and physical and psychological well-being of individuals post-stroke. The current paper outlines a systematic review protocol on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life as well as physical and psychological well-being of individuals with stroke. Methods MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and PsycINFO databases will be searched. Two independent reviewers will conduct all levels of screening, data abstraction, and quality appraisal. Only randomized controlled trials that report on the impact of quality improvement strategies on quality of life outcomes in people with stroke will be included. The secondary outcomes will be physical and psychological well-being. Quality improvement strategies include audit and feedback, case management, team changes, electronic patient registries, clinician education, clinical reminders, facilitated relay of clinical information to clinicians, patient education, (promotion of) self-management, patient reminder systems, and continuous quality improvement. Studies published since 2000 will be included to increase the relevancy of findings. Results will be grouped according to the target group of the varying quality improvement strategies (i.e., health system, health care professionals, or patients) and/or by any other noteworthy grouping variables, such as etiology of stroke or by sex. Discussion This systematic review will identify those quality improvement strategies aimed at the health system, health care professionals, and patients that impact the quality of life of individuals with stroke. Improving awareness and utilization of such strategies may enhance uptake of stroke best practices and reduce inappropriate health care utilization costs. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, CRD42017064141http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3StrokeQuality improvementKnowledge translationQuality of lifeSystematic reviewProtocol
spellingShingle Sarah E.P. Munce
Laure Perrier
Saeha Shin
Chamila Adhihetty
Kristen Pitzul
Michelle L.A. Nelson
Mark T. Bayley
Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
Systematic Reviews
Stroke
Quality improvement
Knowledge translation
Quality of life
Systematic review
Protocol
title Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_full Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_fullStr Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_short Strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post-stroke: protocol of a systematic review
title_sort strategies to improve the quality of life of persons post stroke protocol of a systematic review
topic Stroke
Quality improvement
Knowledge translation
Quality of life
Systematic review
Protocol
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13643-017-0579-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahepmunce strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT laureperrier strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT saehashin strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT chamilaadhihetty strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT kristenpitzul strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT michellelanelson strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview
AT marktbayley strategiestoimprovethequalityoflifeofpersonspoststrokeprotocolofasystematicreview