Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective

Objective: This study evaluated interhospital variability and determinants of failure-to-rescue for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Methods: An observational study was conducted among 28,842 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tyler M. Bauer, MD, Michael Pienta, MD, MS, Xiaoting Wu, PhD, Eric J. Lehr, MD, PhD, Glenn J.R. Whitman, MD, Robert S. Kramer, MD, James Brevig, MD, Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD, Donald S. Likosky, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:JTCVS Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002255
_version_ 1827578583132930048
author Tyler M. Bauer, MD
Michael Pienta, MD, MS
Xiaoting Wu, PhD
Eric J. Lehr, MD, PhD
Glenn J.R. Whitman, MD
Robert S. Kramer, MD
James Brevig, MD
Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD
Donald S. Likosky, PhD
author_facet Tyler M. Bauer, MD
Michael Pienta, MD, MS
Xiaoting Wu, PhD
Eric J. Lehr, MD, PhD
Glenn J.R. Whitman, MD
Robert S. Kramer, MD
James Brevig, MD
Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD
Donald S. Likosky, PhD
author_sort Tyler M. Bauer, MD
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study evaluated interhospital variability and determinants of failure-to-rescue for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Methods: An observational study was conducted among 28,842 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between July 2011 and June 2017 across 90 hospitals participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Postoperative complications were defined as major (stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, sternal infection) and overall (major plus 14 other morbidities). Hospital terciles of observed to expected (O/E) mortality were compared on crude rates of major and overall complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue (among major and overall complications). The correlation between hospital observed and expected failure-to-rescue rates was assessed. Results: Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database predicted mortality risk was similar across hospital O:E mortality terciles (P = .10). As expected, mortality rates significantly increased across terciles (low O/E tercile: 1.6%, high O/E tercile: 4.7%; P < .001). Failure-to-rescue rates increased substantially across hospital mortality terciles among patients with major (low tercile, 8.8% and high tercile, 20.8%) and overall (low tercile, 3.0% and high tercile, 8.9%) complications. Hospital-level expected failure to rescue had a higher correlation with observed complications for overall complications (R2 = 0.71) compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons major complications (R2 = 0.24). Conclusions: Considerable interhospital variation exists in failure-to-rescue rates following aortic valve replacement. Hospitals in the low O/E mortality tercile experience failure to rescue nearly one-third less than those in the high O/E mortality tercile. Efforts to advance quality will benefit from identifying and disseminating optimal rescue strategies in this patient population.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:48:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea8fe46c222f48a6b63235829a13d9e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-2736
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:48:34Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series JTCVS Open
spelling doaj.art-ea8fe46c222f48a6b63235829a13d9e22023-12-20T07:38:08ZengElsevierJTCVS Open2666-27362023-12-0116123138Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspectiveTyler M. Bauer, MD0Michael Pienta, MD, MS1Xiaoting Wu, PhD2Eric J. Lehr, MD, PhD3Glenn J.R. Whitman, MD4Robert S. Kramer, MD5James Brevig, MD6Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD7Donald S. Likosky, PhD8Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MichDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MichDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MichDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WashDivision of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MdDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, MaineProvidence St Joseph Heart Institute, Renton, Wash; Providence Regional Medical Center, Everett, WashDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MichDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Mich; Address for reprints: Donald S. Likosky, PhD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.Objective: This study evaluated interhospital variability and determinants of failure-to-rescue for patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement. Methods: An observational study was conducted among 28,842 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with or without coronary artery bypass grafting between July 2011 and June 2017 across 90 hospitals participating in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database. Postoperative complications were defined as major (stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, sternal infection) and overall (major plus 14 other morbidities). Hospital terciles of observed to expected (O/E) mortality were compared on crude rates of major and overall complications, operative mortality, and failure to rescue (among major and overall complications). The correlation between hospital observed and expected failure-to-rescue rates was assessed. Results: Median Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database predicted mortality risk was similar across hospital O:E mortality terciles (P = .10). As expected, mortality rates significantly increased across terciles (low O/E tercile: 1.6%, high O/E tercile: 4.7%; P < .001). Failure-to-rescue rates increased substantially across hospital mortality terciles among patients with major (low tercile, 8.8% and high tercile, 20.8%) and overall (low tercile, 3.0% and high tercile, 8.9%) complications. Hospital-level expected failure to rescue had a higher correlation with observed complications for overall complications (R2 = 0.71) compared with Society of Thoracic Surgeons major complications (R2 = 0.24). Conclusions: Considerable interhospital variation exists in failure-to-rescue rates following aortic valve replacement. Hospitals in the low O/E mortality tercile experience failure to rescue nearly one-third less than those in the high O/E mortality tercile. Efforts to advance quality will benefit from identifying and disseminating optimal rescue strategies in this patient population.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002255failure-to-rescueSAVRFTR
spellingShingle Tyler M. Bauer, MD
Michael Pienta, MD, MS
Xiaoting Wu, PhD
Eric J. Lehr, MD, PhD
Glenn J.R. Whitman, MD
Robert S. Kramer, MD
James Brevig, MD
Francis D. Pagani, MD, PhD
Donald S. Likosky, PhD
Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
JTCVS Open
failure-to-rescue
SAVR
FTR
title Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
title_full Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
title_fullStr Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
title_full_unstemmed Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
title_short Interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
title_sort interhospital variability in failure to rescue rates following aortic valve surgerycentral messageperspective
topic failure-to-rescue
SAVR
FTR
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002255
work_keys_str_mv AT tylermbauermd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT michaelpientamdms interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT xiaotingwuphd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT ericjlehrmdphd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT glennjrwhitmanmd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT robertskramermd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT jamesbrevigmd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT francisdpaganimdphd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective
AT donaldslikoskyphd interhospitalvariabilityinfailuretorescueratesfollowingaorticvalvesurgerycentralmessageperspective