Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking

Despite the overall complexity of legged locomotion, the motion of the center of mass (COM) itself is relatively simple, and can be qualitatively described by simple mechanical models. In particular, walking can be qualitatively modeled by a simple model in which each leg is described by a spring-lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Antoniak, Tirthabir Biswas, Nelson Cortes, Siddhartha Sikdar, Chanwoo Chun, Vikas Bhandawat
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Company of Biologists 2019-06-01
Series:Biology Open
Subjects:
Online Access:http://bio.biologists.org/content/8/6/bio043695
_version_ 1818437982889181184
author Gabriel Antoniak
Tirthabir Biswas
Nelson Cortes
Siddhartha Sikdar
Chanwoo Chun
Vikas Bhandawat
author_facet Gabriel Antoniak
Tirthabir Biswas
Nelson Cortes
Siddhartha Sikdar
Chanwoo Chun
Vikas Bhandawat
author_sort Gabriel Antoniak
collection DOAJ
description Despite the overall complexity of legged locomotion, the motion of the center of mass (COM) itself is relatively simple, and can be qualitatively described by simple mechanical models. In particular, walking can be qualitatively modeled by a simple model in which each leg is described by a spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP). However, SLIP has many limitations and is unlikely to serve as a quantitative model. As a first step to obtaining a quantitative model for walking, we explored the ability of SLIP to model the single-support phase of walking, and found that SLIP has two limitations. First, it predicts larger horizontal ground reaction forces (GRFs) than empirically observed. A new model – angular and radial spring-loaded inverted pendulum (ARSLIP) – can overcome this deficit. Second, although the leg spring (surprisingly) goes through contraction-extension-contraction-extensions (CECEs) during the single-support phase of walking and can produce the characteristic M-shaped vertical GRFs, modeling the single-support phase requires active elements. Despite these limitations, SLIP as a model provides important insights. It shows that the CECE cycling lengthens the stance duration allowing the COM to travel passively for longer, and decreases the velocity redirection between the beginning and end of a step.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T17:33:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ea913754c8694e86a098a9e7d4dcddef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-6390
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T17:33:20Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher The Company of Biologists
record_format Article
series Biology Open
spelling doaj.art-ea913754c8694e86a098a9e7d4dcddef2022-12-21T22:53:03ZengThe Company of BiologistsBiology Open2046-63902019-06-018610.1242/bio.043695043695Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walkingGabriel Antoniak0Tirthabir Biswas1Nelson Cortes2Siddhartha Sikdar3Chanwoo Chun4Vikas Bhandawat5 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Department of Physics, Loyola University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA Department of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA Despite the overall complexity of legged locomotion, the motion of the center of mass (COM) itself is relatively simple, and can be qualitatively described by simple mechanical models. In particular, walking can be qualitatively modeled by a simple model in which each leg is described by a spring-loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP). However, SLIP has many limitations and is unlikely to serve as a quantitative model. As a first step to obtaining a quantitative model for walking, we explored the ability of SLIP to model the single-support phase of walking, and found that SLIP has two limitations. First, it predicts larger horizontal ground reaction forces (GRFs) than empirically observed. A new model – angular and radial spring-loaded inverted pendulum (ARSLIP) – can overcome this deficit. Second, although the leg spring (surprisingly) goes through contraction-extension-contraction-extensions (CECEs) during the single-support phase of walking and can produce the characteristic M-shaped vertical GRFs, modeling the single-support phase requires active elements. Despite these limitations, SLIP as a model provides important insights. It shows that the CECE cycling lengthens the stance duration allowing the COM to travel passively for longer, and decreases the velocity redirection between the beginning and end of a step.http://bio.biologists.org/content/8/6/bio043695BiomechanicsLocomotionSpring-loaded inverted pendulum
spellingShingle Gabriel Antoniak
Tirthabir Biswas
Nelson Cortes
Siddhartha Sikdar
Chanwoo Chun
Vikas Bhandawat
Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
Biology Open
Biomechanics
Locomotion
Spring-loaded inverted pendulum
title Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
title_full Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
title_fullStr Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
title_full_unstemmed Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
title_short Spring-loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction-extension cycles during the single-support phase of walking
title_sort spring loaded inverted pendulum goes through two contraction extension cycles during the single support phase of walking
topic Biomechanics
Locomotion
Spring-loaded inverted pendulum
url http://bio.biologists.org/content/8/6/bio043695
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielantoniak springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking
AT tirthabirbiswas springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking
AT nelsoncortes springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking
AT siddharthasikdar springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking
AT chanwoochun springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking
AT vikasbhandawat springloadedinvertedpendulumgoesthroughtwocontractionextensioncyclesduringthesinglesupportphaseofwalking