Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight

INTRODUCTION: Modern obstetrics aims to achieve the best quality of life for both the mother and her unborn child. Birth weight is an important predictor of neonatal outcome, and its prenatal estimation plays a significant role in the comprehensive evaluation and management of high-risk pregnancies....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anjali Singh, Anjani K. Srivastava, Ankit Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC)/Rwanda Health Communication Center 2023-09-01
Series:Rwanda Medical Journal
Subjects:
_version_ 1797659215357018112
author Anjali Singh
Anjani K. Srivastava
Ankit Singh
author_facet Anjali Singh
Anjani K. Srivastava
Ankit Singh
author_sort Anjali Singh
collection DOAJ
description INTRODUCTION: Modern obstetrics aims to achieve the best quality of life for both the mother and her unborn child. Birth weight is an important predictor of neonatal outcome, and its prenatal estimation plays a significant role in the comprehensive evaluation and management of high-risk pregnancies. This study aims to estimate fetal weight using different clinical methods and ultrasonography and compare these methods with the actual birth weight. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional comparative study of 200 full-term pregnant women admitted to the Northern Railway Central Hospital, New Delhi, between June 2014 and June 2015 was conducted. Patients in whom delivery was anticipated and completed within 1 week were included. Fetal weights were estimated clinically using Insler’s and Johnson’s formula and ultrasound using Hadlock’s formula. Estimates were then compared with actual birth weight. RESULTS: Both the clinical methods showed underestimation of fetal weight, while ultrasound estimation of fetal weight showed overestimation. Clinical methods had a lower average error in fetal weight estimation than ultrasonography methods. Reliability statistics showed a better prediction of fetal weight if all three methods were used in conjunction. CONCLUSION: Clinical methods were found to be better than the ultrasonography method for fetal weight estimation. Clinical methods are easy and cost-effective for the patients, so all relevant health workers should be taught how to undertake this skill competently. However, all the methods must be used in conjunction.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T18:11:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eaa8fad335144ba7898c4ad55983d485
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2410-8626
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T18:11:40Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC)/Rwanda Health Communication Center
record_format Article
series Rwanda Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-eaa8fad335144ba7898c4ad55983d4852023-10-16T14:08:26ZengRwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC)/Rwanda Health Communication CenterRwanda Medical Journal2410-86262023-09-01803814https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v80i3.2Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weightAnjali Singh0Anjani K. Srivastava1Ankit Singh2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, United Institute of Medical Sciences and United Medicity, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Community Medicine, United Institute of Medical Sciences and United Medicity, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaDepartment of Community Medicine, United Institute of Medical Sciences and United Medicity, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaINTRODUCTION: Modern obstetrics aims to achieve the best quality of life for both the mother and her unborn child. Birth weight is an important predictor of neonatal outcome, and its prenatal estimation plays a significant role in the comprehensive evaluation and management of high-risk pregnancies. This study aims to estimate fetal weight using different clinical methods and ultrasonography and compare these methods with the actual birth weight. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional comparative study of 200 full-term pregnant women admitted to the Northern Railway Central Hospital, New Delhi, between June 2014 and June 2015 was conducted. Patients in whom delivery was anticipated and completed within 1 week were included. Fetal weights were estimated clinically using Insler’s and Johnson’s formula and ultrasound using Hadlock’s formula. Estimates were then compared with actual birth weight. RESULTS: Both the clinical methods showed underestimation of fetal weight, while ultrasound estimation of fetal weight showed overestimation. Clinical methods had a lower average error in fetal weight estimation than ultrasonography methods. Reliability statistics showed a better prediction of fetal weight if all three methods were used in conjunction. CONCLUSION: Clinical methods were found to be better than the ultrasonography method for fetal weight estimation. Clinical methods are easy and cost-effective for the patients, so all relevant health workers should be taught how to undertake this skill competently. However, all the methods must be used in conjunction.fetal weightmethodsbirth weightultrasonographyprenatal
spellingShingle Anjali Singh
Anjani K. Srivastava
Ankit Singh
Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
Rwanda Medical Journal
fetal weight
methods
birth weight
ultrasonography
prenatal
title Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
title_full Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
title_fullStr Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
title_short Comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
title_sort comparative study of fetal weight estimation by various methods at term and its correlation with the actual birth weight
topic fetal weight
methods
birth weight
ultrasonography
prenatal
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalisingh comparativestudyoffetalweightestimationbyvariousmethodsattermanditscorrelationwiththeactualbirthweight
AT anjaniksrivastava comparativestudyoffetalweightestimationbyvariousmethodsattermanditscorrelationwiththeactualbirthweight
AT ankitsingh comparativestudyoffetalweightestimationbyvariousmethodsattermanditscorrelationwiththeactualbirthweight