Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case

The present article aims to analyze selected aspects of the conflict between two basic values: freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Based on the co-called Aiisa’s case (see the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 July 2021, Ana Gachechiladze v. Georgia, App. No. 2591/19),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dimitry Gegenava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin 2022-12-01
Series:Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/spw/article/view/14126
_version_ 1828073282098692096
author Dimitry Gegenava
author_facet Dimitry Gegenava
author_sort Dimitry Gegenava
collection DOAJ
description The present article aims to analyze selected aspects of the conflict between two basic values: freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Based on the co-called Aiisa’s case (see the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 July 2021, Ana Gachechiladze v. Georgia, App. No. 2591/19), the paper proposes general criteria for assessing insults to religious feelings. It is argued that national courts must not act as guardians of concrete religious groups or conventional morals, as this leads to negative results and destruction of the national law system. As a rule, it cannot be excluded that sacred images and figures are used in commercials or other ways of expression. When adjudicating on a case, every court should primarily consider the context, content and form, and prohibition of expression should be the last and final resort.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T01:25:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-eaaa7ea175aa44ab8e271e53d2c681a1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2081-8882
2544-3003
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T01:25:27Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin
record_format Article
series Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
spelling doaj.art-eaaa7ea175aa44ab8e271e53d2c681a12023-01-03T10:35:57ZengThe John Paul II Catholic University of LublinStudia z Prawa Wyznaniowego2081-88822544-30032022-12-01259110510.31743/spw.1412617292Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s caseDimitry Gegenava0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3269-3924Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani UniversityThe present article aims to analyze selected aspects of the conflict between two basic values: freedom of expression and freedom of religion. Based on the co-called Aiisa’s case (see the judgement of the European Court of Human Rights of 22 July 2021, Ana Gachechiladze v. Georgia, App. No. 2591/19), the paper proposes general criteria for assessing insults to religious feelings. It is argued that national courts must not act as guardians of concrete religious groups or conventional morals, as this leads to negative results and destruction of the national law system. As a rule, it cannot be excluded that sacred images and figures are used in commercials or other ways of expression. When adjudicating on a case, every court should primarily consider the context, content and form, and prohibition of expression should be the last and final resort.https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/spw/article/view/14126ana gachechiladze v. georgiafreedom of expressionfreedom of religionreligious feelingsfreedom of opinion and expression
spellingShingle Dimitry Gegenava
Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
Studia z Prawa Wyznaniowego
ana gachechiladze v. georgia
freedom of expression
freedom of religion
religious feelings
freedom of opinion and expression
title Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
title_full Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
title_fullStr Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
title_full_unstemmed Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
title_short Insults to religious feelings v. freedom of expression: Lessons from Aiisa’s case
title_sort insults to religious feelings v freedom of expression lessons from aiisa s case
topic ana gachechiladze v. georgia
freedom of expression
freedom of religion
religious feelings
freedom of opinion and expression
url https://czasopisma.kul.pl/index.php/spw/article/view/14126
work_keys_str_mv AT dimitrygegenava insultstoreligiousfeelingsvfreedomofexpressionlessonsfromaiisascase