Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries

This paper is a summary of my 700-page very academic thesis, in Danish, to be published by Aarhus University Press (AUP). A shorter booklet based on it was published by AUP too (November 2014, 250 pages) and so were a number of shorter articles in English, French and German. In Luhmann’s systems the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gorm Harste
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The University of Akureyri 2016-03-01
Series:Nordicum-Mediterraneum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://nome.unak.is/wordpress/volume-10-no-3-2016/conference-paper-10-3/critique-of-war-reason-a-perspective-on-self-referential-systems-11th-21st-centuries/
_version_ 1797334963968802816
author Gorm Harste
author_facet Gorm Harste
author_sort Gorm Harste
collection DOAJ
description This paper is a summary of my 700-page very academic thesis, in Danish, to be published by Aarhus University Press (AUP). A shorter booklet based on it was published by AUP too (November 2014, 250 pages) and so were a number of shorter articles in English, French and German. In Luhmann’s systems theory and in sociology at large there is a missing link consisting in the lack of a sociology of war. A number of German systems theoreticians use Luhmann’s theory to fill that gap. Yet Luhmann (born 1927), who was a soldier and a prisoner of war from age 15-17, would not write a “Der Krieg der Gesellschaft”. The attempt to narrow this lacuna is indeed a heavy burden and a difficult task, in which it is decisive firstly to get the basic distinctions right about a second order observation of war as a conflict system – to be distinct from a military organisational system. This, I do by beginning with a reconceptualization of Carl von Clausewitz’ form analysis and self-description of war from Vom Kriege (1832). The central point is to observe the self-reference of war, or how war became war about war. Conflict is basically a problem of essentially contested communication. Once this historical self-reference established around the 17th century was in place, war became delimited by its structural couplings to religion, mass media (propaganda), finance, welfare for victims and veterans, law, politics and other functional systems. The costs of war increased, reconstituted and transformed modern society in a way that has formed a range of risks and – of course – neglected blind spots.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:28:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ead9e9a4d827464190908acea871d9c9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1670-6242
1670-6242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:28:56Z
publishDate 2016-03-01
publisher The University of Akureyri
record_format Article
series Nordicum-Mediterraneum
spelling doaj.art-ead9e9a4d827464190908acea871d9c92024-02-02T03:54:22ZengThe University of AkureyriNordicum-Mediterraneum1670-62421670-62422016-03-01103A2Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st CenturiesGorm HarsteThis paper is a summary of my 700-page very academic thesis, in Danish, to be published by Aarhus University Press (AUP). A shorter booklet based on it was published by AUP too (November 2014, 250 pages) and so were a number of shorter articles in English, French and German. In Luhmann’s systems theory and in sociology at large there is a missing link consisting in the lack of a sociology of war. A number of German systems theoreticians use Luhmann’s theory to fill that gap. Yet Luhmann (born 1927), who was a soldier and a prisoner of war from age 15-17, would not write a “Der Krieg der Gesellschaft”. The attempt to narrow this lacuna is indeed a heavy burden and a difficult task, in which it is decisive firstly to get the basic distinctions right about a second order observation of war as a conflict system – to be distinct from a military organisational system. This, I do by beginning with a reconceptualization of Carl von Clausewitz’ form analysis and self-description of war from Vom Kriege (1832). The central point is to observe the self-reference of war, or how war became war about war. Conflict is basically a problem of essentially contested communication. Once this historical self-reference established around the 17th century was in place, war became delimited by its structural couplings to religion, mass media (propaganda), finance, welfare for victims and veterans, law, politics and other functional systems. The costs of war increased, reconstituted and transformed modern society in a way that has formed a range of risks and – of course – neglected blind spots.http://nome.unak.is/wordpress/volume-10-no-3-2016/conference-paper-10-3/critique-of-war-reason-a-perspective-on-self-referential-systems-11th-21st-centuries/communicationHabermasLuhmannsystem theorywarfareClausewitz
spellingShingle Gorm Harste
Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
Nordicum-Mediterraneum
communication
Habermas
Luhmann
system theory
warfare
Clausewitz
title Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
title_full Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
title_fullStr Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
title_full_unstemmed Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
title_short Critique of War Reason. A Perspective on Self-referential Systems, 11th-21st Centuries
title_sort critique of war reason a perspective on self referential systems 11th 21st centuries
topic communication
Habermas
Luhmann
system theory
warfare
Clausewitz
url http://nome.unak.is/wordpress/volume-10-no-3-2016/conference-paper-10-3/critique-of-war-reason-a-perspective-on-self-referential-systems-11th-21st-centuries/
work_keys_str_mv AT gormharste critiqueofwarreasonaperspectiveonselfreferentialsystems11th21stcenturies